Month: December 2023

“Rebel Moon: Part One – A Child of Fire” starring Sofia Boutella, Djimon Hounsou, Ed Skrein, Michiel Huisman, & Charlie Hunnam

Emma3 Comments

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Rebel Moon: Part One – A Child of Fire (2023) streaming on Netflix.

When a peaceful settlement on the edge of a distant moon finds itself threatened by the armies of a tyrannical ruling force, Kora (Sofia Boutella), a mysterious stranger living among the villagers, becomes their best hope for survival. Tasked with finding trained fighters who will unite with her in making an impossible stand against the Mother World, Kora assembles a small band of warriors – outsiders, insurgents, peasants and orphans of war from different worlds who share a common need for redemption and revenge. As the shadow of an entire Realm bears down on the unlikeliest of moons, a battle over the fate of a galaxy is waged, and in the process, a new army of heroes is formed. -Synopsis (Netflix)

Remember when y’all dressed up in your parents’ clothes, shoes, etc. and acted like a grown-up? This new movie (streaming on Netflix) is NOT connected to Star Wars (as I’d assumed). I learned that Zack Snyder 1st conceived this as a Star Wars movie; he pitched it to Lucasfilm in 2012 (after it was sold to Disney). As many critics have noted, this is a take on Seven Samurai (1954) dir. by Akira Kurosawa. It’s basically style (SFX/action) over substance, though the CGI isn’t always impressive. I don’t know much re: Snyder’s work (though I know he is a divisive filmmaker); I saw Man of Steel at a (free) pre-screening in 2013. Nope, I would NOT have paid for that movie!

The cast incl. some actors who we (barely) know or haven’t seen before. Boutella (looking FAB at age 40- mad respect for that) is a French-Algerian actress w/ a strong background in dance/former model. I’ve ONLY seen her in Star Trek Beyond (2016) and an ep of Modern Love (2019); she doesn’t have range. This is the 1st time Ed Skrein (Adm. Atticus Noble) and Michiel Huisman (the lead farmer Gunnar) have worked together since Huisman (who is Danish) replaced Skrein (a Brit who resembles a young Jonathan Rhys Meyers) as Daario Naharis in Game of Thrones. Skrein (in the main baddie role) and his troupe of Mother World (NOT the Empire) soldiers are dressed in uniforms almost exactly like Nazis. Yikes, talk about a lazy shortcut for characterization! Huisman (though sporting bigger muscles/lusher hair than in previous roles) still comes off awkward and lacks charisma/screen presence. I recall that MANY viewers complained after he took on Daario; I also saw him in the ensemble drama Treme. As for Charlie Hunnam (Kai), he’s a baddie version of Han Solo w/ a man bun/twinkling blue eyes who speaks w/ an (exaggerated) Irish accent. Yes, Hunnam has charm, BUT that can’t save him here!

The fault should NOT totally fall on the actors’ (well-sculpted) shoulders; the script is uninspiring and the plot is thin. One viewer asked: “Was this written by AI?” LOL! There is a badass woman heroine (who can beat-up men 2x her size), innocent/peaceful farmers, cliched/nasty villains (incl. potential rapists), and a V little arc to the story. As w/ MANY Netflix series/movies, there are TOO many characters who are barely developed; the audience ends up caring little about their fates. As Kora gathers the diverse team of warriors (each w/ a different style), we wonder why they want to join this fight. Like many viewers commented, I wanted to see more of the hardened warrior (played by Djimon Hounsou) and the robot character, Jimmy (voiced by Anthony Hopkins), who has a good scene in the 1st act. I’m also NOT a fan of slow-mo and lens flares (why I quit watching ST: Discovery).

[1] Imagine you’re a twelve year old boy, having watched some cool movies for the first time five minutes ago, having your bootleg toys of popular franchises and smashing them together in dirt saying “and then” every couple of minutes. Now imagine you get tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars to make that a movie.

Now imagine that being better than this.

[2] Other than the world design and effects, there really isn’t much else to salvage from it. In true Snyder style we’ve got lens flare and slow motion, but this time he’s dialed it up over the top. Some of the action scenes are absolutely ruined from way too much diving in and out of slow motion.

[3] The plot? Star Wars excuse aside, it’s a mess. The preposterousness of engaging with their Seven Samurai recruits at moments when each is faced with a crucial test is just lazy storytelling.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Spoiler-Free Reviews of Three 2023 Movies

EmmaLeave a comment

Killers of the Flower Moon

In 1920s Oklahoma, a simple-minded/former WWII soldier, Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio), comes under the influence of his powerful/businessman uncle, William Hale (Robert DeNiro). In this area, the members of the Osage nation are V wealthy, as they hold land rights (to where oil was discovered). While working as a driver, Ernest meets and courts Mollie (Lily Gladstone), a young/single Osage woman who comes from a family of several sisters. Ernest and Mollie marry and have children, though their life together is NOT always smooth. In time, we learn of (mysterious) deaths of several Osage; the (newly formed) FBI sends agents to investigate, incl. Tom White (Jesse Plemons).

IF the 3 hrs. and 26 mins. run time doesn’t put you off, then you should check it out. I feel V important events, issues, and themes are discussed. I saw it w/ 2 of my friends a few weeks after it was released. I think younger (under 25) audiences could have a tough time, as they have shorter attention spans. Modern viewers are also NOT used to such long takes of scenes, some of which could’ve been edited further. IF you’re sensitive to blood, racist/sexist language, and violence, this MAY be difficult to watch; director Martin Scorsese films don’t shy away from these elements.

DiCaprio (who made a salary of $30M) is wearing a downturned (frowning) expression w/ his brows knit tightly; some critics commented that Ernest is working hard to understand what’s going on (as he’s NOT V smart). Gladstone is prominent in the 1st half of the film; she can express a LOT while speaking little. DeNiro plays the affable (unofficial) patriarch; he speaks the Osage language and knows the culture. I thought that most of the supporting (mostly NOT famous) characters did a good job and fit their roles; the standout was Louis Cancelmi (as several critics have noted). The production design was V impressive; you can tell that a LOT of research went into this production.

I was disappointed that the FBI storyline was NOT as developed much as I expected. The FBI came in ONLY in the last 1/3 of the movie; Tatanka Means (son of activist/actor Russell Means) is the young/handsome Native American agent. As some of you MAY know, the (original) script had DiCaprio playing Tom White and focused more on the law & order angle. When Scorsese decided to focus more on Ernest and Mollie’s story, Plemons was brought on to play Agent White (who became a supporting character). There are some V effective shots which will stay in your mind; we wouldn’t expect less from Scorsese. What did you think of the ending? I think it was an unusual directorial decision. This story did get me emotional in the final moments.

Napoleon

I went to see this movie on a TUES about one week after it was released; I ONLY paid $7 for the ticket (at Regal). I didn’t have high hopes, BUT was curious to see what director Ridley Scott had done. I was disappointed to see that French actor, Tahar Rahim (who plays aristocrat/general Paul Barras), was ONLY in the first 1/3 of the story. English actress Vanessa Kirby (Josephine) is a strong onscreen presence; I wanted to know a BIT more about her. As for Joaquin Phoenix in the lead role, I was NOT impressed by the characterization (we know he is a strong actor). He speaks w/ an American accent and is now close to 50; Napoleon accomplished much as a young man. Napoleon often looks tired, annoyed, and petulant; we see him planning battles (in ONLY one scene) though he was famed for strategy. As one critic said, this movie shows us “the greatest hits” (just 3 of his battles). As for these few action scenes, I thought they were done quite well. Some of the background CGI is NOT that realistic. At the end, I saw that the (small) audience I went to see it w/ was NOT impressed. Scott’s work in the past 15 yrs. has been hit or miss.

Oppenheimer

I went to see this movie the day after it was released, as I had time off that afternoon; the (IMAX) theater was full w/ viewers of ALL ages. I’m sure MANY of you have heard/read re: this movie, so I won’t give a synopsis. I was glad to see that Cillian Murphy (an Irish actor I admire) got a starring role; he is now 47 y.o. (so it’s high time). He is up to the challenge of carrying the film; there are MANY close-ups of his face. My audience seemed to enjoy the scenes w/ Murphy and Matt Damon (in the 1st act); they have good onscreen chemistry and quippy banter. Even more so than w/ KOTFM, we see supporting actors who each get a chance to shine. The standouts among the scientists are two Americans: David Krumholtz (who started out in teen comedies) and Benny Safdie (also an indie director). There are some cameos which MAY surprise viewers.

Unfortunately, we don’t get a LOT of character development for the 2 main women- Kitty (Emily Blunt) and Jean (Florence Pugh). Blunt gets more to do than Pugh; as some critics said in the past, director Christopher Nolan doesn’t focus much on women. Another issue is the (incessantly overdramatic) music which I did NOT appreciate! There are a few shots (whether practical or special effects) that were V impressive. When we get to the last act, it looked like people were NOT as engaged. This is the section where we see more of Robert Downey, Jr; his young aide is played by Alden Ehrenreich (who was the co-lead in Fair Play). It was a V long movie, BUT I was mostly interested in the material. Nolan isn’t much for emotion (as y’all cinephiles know), BUT he does have an unique viewpoint here.

“One Royal Holiday” (2020) starring Laura Osnes & Aaron Tveit

EmmaLeave a comment

When Anna offers a stranded mother and son shelter in a blizzard, she learns that they are the Royal Family of Galwick. Anna shows the Prince how they do Christmas in her hometown, encouraging him to open his heart and be true to himself. -Synopsis (Hallmark)

[1] ...despite the predictability of the final outcome, the writing is fresh, with plot twists and surprises that add layers of emotional depth.

[2] Finally a prince who acts like a prince! This was a sweet coincidental love story. Thank you Hallmark!

[3] Surprisingly fun and trope-filled royal holiday movie is packed with Broadway greats.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

I came across this Hallmark Xmas movie last month by chance; you can rent it on Amazon Prime. I noticed that it stars (surprise) Broadway/theater actors/singers: Laura Osnes (who plays cheerful cardiac nurse Anna Jordan) and Aaron Tveit (who plays serious/grumpy Prince James Gallant). Some of y’all MAY recognize Tveit from the 2012 adaptation of Les Miserables; he played the friend/fellow rebel to Marius. Here he uses a British accent and has slightly longish hair; the actor has the handsome looks of a prince. This movie as shot in June 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic); it was the 1st movie to go into production in Connecticut (and the East Coast) at that time.

Anna is NOT intimidated/nervous in the presence of the royals; she pokes fun at James (in a sweet/harmless style). James is a BIT arrogant and acts entitled (at first), BUT he has real worries. As they are snowbound, Anna and James (who seem like opposites) get to know each other. There are cute/funny references to Jane Austen novels and The Sound of Music. Osnes and Tveit have good onscreen chemistry; you can see their relationship develop.

Unlike a LOT of other Hallmark movies, the supporting characters get stuff to do. Queen Gabriella (Victoria Clark) is V supportive of her son; she is BOTH down-to-earth and elegant. Anna’s widowed father, Ed (Tom McGowan- a Canadian character actor), is a jolly innkeeper who is close w/ his daughter. Anna’s childhood friend, Sarah (Krystal Joy Brown), is the mayor of the small town; she has a side plot w/ romance. There are 2 scenes where Xmas carols are sung to showcase the actors’ FAB voices.

2024 To Be Read (TBR) List

Emma1 Comment

Introduction

Thanks for following/reading my blog. This is the year that I got back into reading (for fun), though I didn’t finish a LOT of books. I’m a slow reader, though I was English major (LOL)! I shopped via Amazon Prime, Loyalty Books (a DMV-based indie bookstore), and Thrift Books (a web site w/ a wide selection). There were a LOT of “Reylo” (the shipper name for Rey + Kylo Ren) books published in pandemic life (2020-2023). On Reddit, some Adam Driver (AD) fans have a weekly book club; this also motivates me to read. I’ve been following a few gals who are “BookTubers;” they put reviews on YT.

Currently Reading: Fall/Winter 2023

  1. Loathe to Love You (Ali Hazelwood) – 3 stories in 1 novel; for modern rom com fans
  2. The Love Hypothesis (Ali Hazelwood) – Reddit AD fans are reading; one of the many Reylo books.
  3. The Lives of Robert Ryan (J.A. Jones) – For classic movie (esp. film noir) fans.
  4. Love in the Afternoon (Lisa Kleypas) – Almost done reading; historical romance.
  5. Where Dreams Begin (Lisa Kleypas) – I’m in the middle of the story; historical romance.
  6. Heat 2: A Novel (Michael Mann; Meg Gardiner) – Reddit AD fans book club.

TBR 2024

  1. The Method: How the Twentieth Century Learned to Act (Isaac Butler)
  2. The Hurricane Wars (Thea Guanzon) – Reylo/romance/fantasy (dedicated to “rats” AKA AD fans).
  3. Book Lovers (Emily Henry) – From my mom’s book club.
  4. Cruel Beauty (Rosamund Hodge) – Beauty and the Beast retelling.
  5. Thief of Shadows (Elizabeth Hoyt) – Historical/Regency romance.
  6. Yellowface (R.F. Kuang) – Another from my mom’s book club.
  7. A Promise of Darkness (Bec McMaster) – Reylo book; 1st of Dark Court Rising series.
  8. Madly, Deeply: The Diaries of Alan Rickman (Alan Rickman; Rima Horton)
  9. Seven Plays (Sam Shepard; Richard Gelman)
  10. The Outsider (Penelope Williamson) – Historical/Western romance.

What are your fave books? Do you have a preferred genre?

Happy holidays (OR happy Winter break) to ALL!

-EMMA

“Johnny Eager” (1941) starring Robert Taylor, Lana Turner, Edward Arnold, & Van Heflin

EmmaLeave a comment

Robert Taylor ‘N Lana Turner – TNT – They’re Dynamite in JOHNNY EAGER -Tagline

Johnny Eager (Robert Taylor, 30 y.o.) is a recent parolee pretending he has quit the rackets (gambling) and working as a taxi driver in NYC. However, he’s still deep into crime; he’s desperate to get a permit to open a dog track. One day, Johnny happens to meet Lisbeth Bard (Lana Turner at just age 20), a college student/step-daughter of the DA, John Benson Farrell (Edward Arnold).

Director Mervyn LeRoy originated the “TNT” idea to promote this movie; it was a box office hit for MGM. I’d never seen Taylor act before, BUT I knew that he was married to Barbara Stanwyck. Life imitated art here, as Taylor fell in love w/ Turner on set and asked his wife for a divorce. Stanwyck is said to have injured her wrists after learning of the illicit romance. Turner quickly broke up w/ Taylor; she was maybe NOT in love w/ him. They do have good chemistry onscreen; those heated looks and kisses aren’t all make believe.

I was curious to see this film noir after learning that it was Van Heflin’s 1st role. He’d been encouraged by Katharine Hepburn (his co-star on Broadway) to try Hollywood. Heflin (looking V slim/youthful) plays Jeff, Johnny’s alcoholic/intellectual best pal. Jeff has some great lines in the movie; Heflin ended up winning the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor!

[1] The glamorous Ms. Turner is at first a little hard to believe as a student studying social work, but she does acquit herself well in some powerfully dramatic scenes with Taylor. Paul Stewart, Glenda Farrell and Edward Arnold chip in fine supporting performances while Van Heflin delivers a magnificent one. Heflin as Eager’s alcoholic sidekick and pickled conscience is not only effectively moving, but also lends a droll sense of wit to the film with his sardonic observations.

[2] The film would never have stood out but for the script (Grant and Mahin) and the direction (LeRoy). The opening sequence and the ending sequence are well crafted and can stand alongside the best of film noir.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews