Tag: Leadership

“Fatal Attraction” (Paramount+): Episode 1

Emma3 Comments

A deep-dive reimagining of the classic 80s thriller, exploring timeless themes of marriage and infidelity through the lens of modern attitudes toward strong women, personality disorders and coercive control. -Synopsis

Introduction:

Are you a fan of the (iconic) movie Fatal Attraction (1987) starring Michael Douglas and Glenn Close, or perhaps the erotic thriller genre? If so, then you may want to check out this new Paramount+ streaming show (w/ a subscription on Amazon Prime). Three eps were released last SUN (April 30th); there will be a total of 8 eps (about 1 hr./ea.) For fans of the original, there are “Easter eggs” to be found, as co-writer Alexandra Cunningham noted. James Dearden (who wrote the original screenplay) is credited; long-time fans may recognize (discarded) ideas from his original script. Beth has a much larger role to play; she has a small business (so is not a housewife). Dearden originally wrote Beth as a schoolteacher who’d taken a few yrs off, BUT was planning to return to work. Producers didn’t like that idea, so that’s why movie Beth (Ann Archer) was an ideal “happy homemaker.”

Episode 1:

15 years after Alex Forrest’s murder, Dan Gallagher is paroled and reaches out to his estranged daughter Ellen. In the past, a crushing career defeat drives him to first connect with Alex. -Synopsis of the pilot episode

Do you know the (alternate) ending to the ’80s movie which the producers rejected? That finale included Dan being convicted of murdering Alex! The ep opens w/ Dan’s hearing in front of the parole board; he has served his sentence of 15 yrs. It sounds like he has been a model prisoner during this time. His manner is humble and his speech is V serious/calm. Though he doesn’t notice her, the adult Ellen (a grad student in Psychology) is at the hearing.

The setting of the story has been moved from NYC to LA. In 2008, Dan (Joshua Jackson, 45 y.o.) is still a lawyer, BUT he’s a Deputy District Attorney (NOT in corporate law). As in the movie, he has a comfy home, loving wife (Beth), and young daughter (Ellen is aged up to 8 y.o.) He seems to be respected/liked by most of his colleagues at the Criminal Courts Building. Dan is turning 40 soon and up for a judgeship. Alex (Lizzy Caplan, 40 y.o.) isn’t a book editor here; she works in Victims Services (and is also a colleague of Dan’s). In the era of #MeToo, this adds another layer to the classic story of infidelity.

This show has 2 timelines: the present (2023) has a cool color palette, while the time period of the affair/its aftermath (2008) has a warmer look. In the past, Dan is often in the center of the frame (as one would typically present a main character). He wears suits, talks fast, and walks in an upright/confident manner. In the present, Dan is sometimes on the sidelines (as the story is NOT just his anymore). He has more gray hair, is dressed V casually, talks carefully (slowly) and has his head/shoulders lowered. There is more to see, so check out the show for yourself!

My first reaction was that I missed the (more glam) setting of Manhattan. Then, I wondered how much of the story would focus on law and order. Ellen’s focus is on Carl Jung; I wonder if this may play out in the show. Do you think the casting of the leads is fitting? I will keep on watching and post review of the full series when it has finished. If you’re active on Twitter, I’ve posted some related tweets. (See videos below.)

Women, Power, & Desire: “Impulse” (1990) & “Body of Evidence” (1992)

Emma2 Comments

Impact (1990) starring Theresa Russell, Jeff Fahey, & George Dzundza

She’s an undercover cop. Seduced by a fantasy. Trapped in a mystery. Led by a dangerous impulse. It’s easy to lose control. -Taglines for the film

This is a psychological thriller co-written by a woman (Leigh Chapman) and directed by a woman- Sondra Locke (who had a palimony suit against Clint Eastwood while making this film). I learned re: Locke’s and Eastwood’s (turbulent) relationship on a recent ep of the podcast You Must Remember This (hosted by Karina Longworth). Yikes, Eastwood does NOT come out looking good! It was V difficult for Locke (who worked as an actress on Eastwood’s projects) to get funding for this small-budget movie (distributed by Warner Bros). In some ways, it’s ahead of it’s time!

Lottie Mason (Russell) is an undercover cop in the LAPD; she’s tall, blonde, and tough (ONLY trusts in herself). Her boss, Lt. Joe Morgan (Dzundza), has been sexually harassing her; we learn this in an early scene. Her bills are piling up and she is TOO invested in her job. While Lottie is helping an ADA- Stan (Fahey)- set-up a drug buy w/ a witness he needs for a case, they become romantically involved. They have a love scene which is unusual for that era, as it’s mainly re: intense gazes (which build tension).

It’s rare (even today) to see a movie centered on a female cop; it has become common on TV/streaming shows. Impulse is gritty, moody, and Russell is believable as a street-smart/independent-minded woman (w/ a hidden soft side). Lottie’s nights of dealing w/ lowlifes has affected her personal life; her Vice assignments incl. impersonating streetwalkers and junkies. She has mandated therapy sessions w/ Dr. Gardner (Lynn Thigpen), where she admits to having a fantasy of losing control and acting on (darker) impulses. Though some viewers felt it was a BIT slow, I think fans of the noir genre or cop dramas may like it. Both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert called this “a V good thriller.” You can see it on Freevee.)

Body of Evidence (1992) starring Madonna & Willem Dafoe

An act of love, or an act of murder? -Tagline for the film

An elderly millionaire in Portland is found dead of heart failure handcuffed to his bed; a home video of him and a woman is running in the background. When cocaine is found in his system, and his will leaves $8 million to this woman (his lover)- Rebecca Carlson (Madonna)- police arrest her on suspicion of murder. Her lawyer, Frank Dulaney (Dafoe), succumbs to her charms and they start a (reckless) affair. As new evidence turns up during trial, Frank begins to wonder if he’s defending a murderer. (I saw the R-rated version on Freevee; many yrs. ago, I saw it on cable.)

Frank Dulaney: It’s not a crime to be a great lay!

Robert Garrett: Well, sure. l’d have to have myself indicted.

Body of Evidence is often (negatively) compared to Basic Instinct; shooting began only 2 weeks after that film was released, so the similarities are probably coincidental. However, the huge success of Paul Verhoeven’s film could still have influenced the direction and editing. Madonna met w/ a (real-life) dominatrix, who taught her how to tie someone’s arms behind their back using a belt. Dafoe attended a criminal trial; it was interrupted when several people (incl. the judge and many jurors) recognized him and wanted to talk. This is on Roger Ebert’s 2005 list of his most hated films. If you enjoy comedy podcasts, check out the ep reviewing this movie on How Did This Get Made?

Frank Dulaney: Counsel for the Prosecution has already used this witness to establish the state of mind of the deceased. He opened the can, Your Honor.

Judge Burnham: And I do see worms crawling all around you, Mr. Garrett.

Madonna was the 1st choice to play Rebecca; producer Dino De Laurentiis purchased the script b/c he believed it was the perfect role for her. She has short/platinum hair, V pale (unflattering) makeup, red lipstick, and designer clothes. Madonna personally selected Dafoe as her co-star, BUT they have no romantic chemistry together! As many filmmakers have noted over the yrs, casting is V important. Also, where is the development of the characters!? Frank seems eager (quite early on) to do what Rebecca prefers. In one of the (later) steamy scenes, Dafoe looks hesitant (as if performing a chore). Madonna’s acting coach quit just before production began, claiming that “she thinks she knows everything.” As this movie will show, she is a V limited actress. The dialogue given to her is NO help at all! The movie’s (German) director, Uli Edel, said Madonna refused to be directed in the sex scenes. She insisted on pouring (real/hot) wax on Dafoe’s chest in (perhaps the most controversial) scene- ouch! To y’all younger gen viewers, little of this content will look daring.

I was too young to know better. It was the first time I’d been asked to get naked and it turned out to be completely extraneous and gratuitous. Ugh. It was a terrible film and a terrible performance by me. It was about nothing, and I didn’t need to be doing it. -Julianne Moore

Joe Mantegna (who plays prosecutor Robert Garrett) said filming the courtroom scenes was so tedious that 2 extras (jurors) fell asleep during Dafoe’s closing statement. Mantegna (always reliable) yelled at them to wake them up- LOL! The director doesn’t know how to make the trial visually interesting. The judge has lines which (in retrospect) are sassy/funny. Anne Archer does OK what little she is given. A young Julianne Moore plays Sharon (Frank’s wife); she runs a successful restaurant and is mom to a preteen son (seen in just one scene). Moore (who can tackle any role) later said she regretted taking this on; she was then new to movies. Frank Langella has a small/pivotal role as a man from Rebecca’s past. One of Madonna’s besties (actress Sandra Bernhard) was heard laughing at the premiere, commenting: “This is not a serious movie!”

[1] It is both as bad as you remember it, but somehow endlessly entertaining.

[2] The movie goes from the ridiculous to the sublime and every thing else in between, and by the time the movie is over, you feel like you went over Niagara Falls on a surf board.

[3] The courtroom and crime scenes is just background to what the movie is, Madonna in the bedroom.

[4] …might have been much more fun had it the slightest sense of humor. Alas, all the laughs here are unintentional, and the straight-faced actors just end up looking foolish. […] For camp-addicts, a hoot; all others beware.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

#Oscars: “Tar” (2022) starring Cate Blanchett, Noemie Merlant, Nina Hoss, Sophie Kauer, Mark Strong, & Julian Glover

Emma1 Comment

Set in the international world of Western classical music, the film centers on Lydia Tár, widely considered one of the greatest living composer-conductors and the very first female director of a major German orchestra. -Synopsis

Lydia Tár: Don’t be so eager to be offended. The narcissism of small differences leads to the most boring kind of conformity.

Conductor/composer Lydia Tár (Cate Blanchett), the first female principal music director of the Berlin Philharmonic, is at the top of her game. She is known as a trailblazer in the male-dominated classical music world. Lydia prepares for the release of her memoir while tackling work and family. She is preparing for one of her biggest challenges: a live recording of Mahler’s Symphony No. 5. However, forces she can’t control chip away at Lydia’s facade, revealing her dirty secrets and the corrupting nature of power. At the 95th Academy Awards, Tár received 6 noms: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Original Screenplay, Best Actress, Best Cinematography, and Best Editing.

Lydia Tár: You want to dance the mask, you must service the composer. You gotta sublimate yourself, your ego, and, yes, your identity. You must, in fact, stand in front of the public and God and obliterate yourself.

Writer/director Todd Field wrote the film specifically for Blanchett and wouldn’t have made the film w/o her; they previously planned to work on a different film that Field could not acquire financing for. Focus Features told Field that they would produce any film that he wanted as long as it was at a certain budget. Blanchett had to re-learn the piano, learned how to speak German, and learned how to conduct an orchestra for the role. Scenes of the orchestra playing are 100% real; Blanchett was actually conducting the Dresden Orchestra. Hungarian pianist and professor at the Hungarian Academy of Music, Emese Virág, helped Blanchett prepare for her role. To bring Tár’s (carefully cultivated) speaking voice into being, she listened to recordings of Susan Sontag.

Lydia Tár: Unfortunately, the architect of your soul appears to be social media.

Is this a real person!? You wouldn’t be alone in wondering this, like my friends and I did when we watched it (Amazon). Near the start of the movie, Tár (who is fictional) is interviewed by Adam Gopnik, a New Yorker reporter, in a V long scene supposed to be taking place at the mag’s annual festival. Her book is being published by Nan Talese at Doubleday. Tar’s suits are tailored by Egon Brandstetter, who plays himself. Even the young Russian cellist, Olga Metkina (Sophie Kauer), is played by a British-German musician who recently got into acting.

The very first scene we shot was a post-rehearsal scene… at the Dresden Philharmonie that’s supposed to be after the very first rehearsal that we see of the Mahler. It was the three of them, it was Cate Blanchett, Nina Hoss and Noémie Merlant, and I remember that first take, and it just, it took my breath away because that’s a part of filmmaking… It’s the magical part of filmmaking. It’s beyond the camera, it’s beyond the lighting, it’s beyond your lens choice, it’s beyond all of – art direction, everything else. It’s human beings in front of a camera that can do MAGICAL things. And that part of it felt like a long overdue homecoming. -Todd Field, on returning to feature filmmaking after 16 yrs.

Can you separate the art from the artist? During a lunch convo btwn Tar and her mentor/friend Andris Davis (Julian Glover), he mentions several real conductors: James Levine, Charles Dutoit, and Wilhelm Furtwängler. In 2017, Dutoit was accused of multiple sexual assaults over several decades; he resigned as artistic director/principal conductor of the Royal Philharmonic. In 2018, the Met announced that James Levine, their principal conductor since 1972, had been fired in the wake of multiple sexual assault allegations and investigations. Wilhelm Furtwängler was principal conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic (1922-1945); though he made symbolic nods toward independence, he was the most prominent conductor to remain in Germany during the Nazi regime and was known as Hitler’s favorite conductor.

She’s always been a key reference for me. I like to re-watch my favorite scenes of hers, sometimes right before I shoot a scene myself; not to copy her, just because it gives me energy. Working with her was mind-blowing. -Noemie Merlant

This film looks and sounds authentic; the viewer is taken (perhaps too deep) into the world of classical music. It’s obvious that Field was given a LOT of freedom to make his vision come to life. Yes, it’s V long (as w/ most movies lately); I think this is one of it’s few weaknesses. Blanchett continues to impress; she can truly play any role! All the supporting players do a fine job; the acting is subtle and realistic IMO. Merlant (who is French) continues to be one of the young’uns to watch; I think she did FAB in Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019). I got a kick out of seeing Mark Strong (wearing a hairpiece) playing a wealthy businessman who is an insecure conductor. FYI: He is still my fave Mr. Knightley.

[1] Tár is a dense film. Thick with dialogue and emotional power. It’s also a bit tricky to get in to and might be a bit much for the casual viewer. That’s a shame though as it’s great.

[2] I seriously doubt that I’ll ever skip a Cate Blanchett movie. She’s won two Oscars and has been nominated six times. She’s consistently the best part of her movies, and often the best in a full year of movies. […] Ms. Blanchett is fascinating and mesmerizing to watch. She is at the top of her game playing a perfectionist who is at the top of her game. However, it’s clear this film isn’t likely to strike the right notes with mainstream audiences.

[3] The central topic emerges rather quickly (abuse of power), but there are diversions which support character development, yet drag on the narrative, which is probably why many reviews here find the film frustrating. […] Field expects viewers to interpret a lot on their own, which is bold and demanding, but with this approach it is crucial to keep focus on an underlying message, otherwise it gets lost. […] In conclusion, “Tár” has all the ingredients for a masterpiece – interesting characters, great performances, nice camerawork – but weak storytelling ultimately reduces the film’s potential.

[4] Near perfection from Blanchett. It’s a steamy, slow burn with a massive payoff, even at 150+ minutes. Cate Blanchett’s range of emotions exhibited through her acting is superb. The closeup orchestra rehearsal scenes are extraordinarily insightful for those who maybe have never been a part of a performing ensemble.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

#Oscars: “Triangle of Sadness” (2022) starring Harris Dickinson, Charlbi Dean, & Woody Harrelson

Emma2 Comments

In Ruben Östlund’s wickedly funny Palme d’Or winner, social hierarchy is turned upside down, revealing the tawdry relationship between power and beauty. Celebrity model couple, Carl (Harris Dickinson) and Yaya (Charlbi Dean), are invited on a luxury cruise for the uber-rich, helmed by an unhinged boat captain (Woody Harrelson). What first appeared instagrammable ends catastrophically, leaving the survivors stranded on a desert island and fighting for survival. -Official Synopsis

Casting Juror: Can you relax your triangle of sadness? Like between your eyebrows here? A little bit more. OK. And open your mouth so you look a bit more available. OK, not that much, a little bit less.

The opening sequence w/ the casting of male models was inspired by writer/director Ruben Östlund’s wife (a fashion photographer). This is the Swedish director’s 1st film in English. This marks the 2nd time that Östlund has was awarded the Palme d’Or at Cannes; he previously won for The Square (2017). British actor Harris Dickinson (now 27 y.o.) won his role after 120 others had auditioned; he spent some time in the Royal Marines Cadets, so he’d have known exactly how to survive on a desert island (unlike Carl). This role is a far cry from Dickinson’s (villainous/macho) one in the disappointing movie Where the Crawdads Sing (2022). Charlbi Dean (a South African model-turned-actress) sadly died after the film’s release at age 32; no cause of death was released (though she had a lung infection, complicated by the fact that she’d lost her spleen years before in a car accident).

We [he and his wife] started talking about fashion and the strategy of marketing, and beauty as a currency. Beauty is attractive, but it’s also scary. Beauty is settling the hierarchy so much- that was really the starting point. -Ruben Ostlund

One critic commented that this (NO hold barred) dark comedy/satire is like 3 movies in one. Another said that “nothing is subtle about it’s delivery or message.” The 1st act (titled Part I) is about the relationship btwn two 20-ish models- Carl (Dickinson) and Yaya (Dean)- who are having relationship probs. Carl (though he posed for a fancy cologne ad a few yrs ago) now makes much less money than his gf, Yaya (who walks Paris runways). However, Yaya (who is also an influencer) is happy to let Carl pay for dinner (at a snooty/pricy) restaurant. (FYI: We learn that male models make about 1/3 of what the females in their field make.) Carl says: “I want us to be equals and is in love w/ Yaya. She nonchalantly admits that she’s waiting to become “a trophy wife.” Hmmm, we wonder IF they can make it (in the long-run)?

[Quoting From Noam Chomsky’s Book: How the World Works]

The Captain: ‘How people perceive themselves is nothing that interests me. There are very few that are gonna look in the mirror and say: The person I see is a savage monster. Instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.’

Part II takes place on a luxury yacht (price: $250M) somewhere in the Mediterranean. The diverse crew is made up of Aussies, Greeks, Filipinos, etc. The guests are from all over the world, incl. England, Germany, and Russia. There are a motley crew of character actors which we meet; most are terrible people, though a few are NOT unsympathetic. The boat’s possibly alcoholic/Marxist captain is played by Woody Harrelson (which will come as a surprise to some viewers)! IF you’re a squeamish/sensitive viewer, this section has gross elements (as I noted re: Babylon). As for Part III, I’m NOT going to say much, but it’s quite unexpected! This is the most interesting part of the movie; earlier parts tended to drag on (and could’ve been edited down more). Why are movies SO long lately!?

“Harriet” (2019) starring Cynthia Erivo, Leslie Odom Jr, & Janelle Monae

Emma1 Comment

The extraordinary tale of Harriet Tubman’s escape from slavery and transformation into one of America’s greatest heroes, whose courage, ingenuity, and tenacity freed hundreds of slaves and changed the course of history. -Synopsis

Be free or die. -A tagline for the film

This is the 1st feature film to be made about the life of American abolitionist Harriet Tubman (birth name: Arabella Minto); you can watch it on HBO Max. Producer Debra Martin Chase chose Cynthia Erivo for the lead b/c of her impressive career so far: Tony, Grammy and Emmy for The Color Purple musical on Broadway. There was controversy in casting a British woman for such an iconic American role; director/co-writer Kasi Lemmons (a Black American woman/former actress) explained that the film represented African-Americans: writers, production designer, composer, and hair/makeup.

Harriet is shown more as a “superhero,” than a real woman; this was the choice of the filmmakers. This movie is sadly disappointing (given the V important subject), though Erivo does a fine job w/ what she as given. The dialogue doesn’t really pop and the delivery (at times) is heavy-handed. Yes, Harriet really did experience visions, as a result of a childhood head injury. Many historians claim that this is likely due to a head injury she received in her youth. It is nice to look at, though there was NOT a big budget. There is some tension/suspense in Tubman’s escape (from a plantation in Dorchester Co, MD) and various rescue missions. There is a narrow range of Tubman’s life shown and there are several jumps in years at a time. One astute viewer noted that “Tubman’s work on women’s suffrage was only a footnote and arguments around what actions the abolitionist movement should take were greatly reduced.” There is no mention of John Brown, BUT Fredrick Douglass has a brief cameo. For the sensitive viewers out there, this is a much less violent portrayal than seen in 12 Years a Slave.

Some actors are highlighted, though others (incl. veterans w/ gravitas) don’t get much screen time. I wanted to see more of Clarke Peters and Vanessa Bell Calloway; they play the Ross’ (Harriet’s parents). A few of Harriet’s family members were free, BUT most others are enslaved. Harriet’s 1st husband, John (Zachary Momo), was a free Black man. Vondie Curtis-Hall (also Lemmons’ husband) does a good job as Rev. Green. Leslie Odom Jr. is bright/charming as William Still, though I doubt this role was a challenge for him. Marie Buchanon (played by singer/actress Janelle Monae) was created for the movie; she is a sympathetic friend to Harrier, but quite modern. I don’t know how plausible it’d have been for a young/Black/unmarried woman to own a boarding house in Philly.

Harriet: [to Gideon, at gunpoint] You’ll die right here. On a frozen, blood-soaked battlefield, the moans of a generation of young men in your ears, dying in agony around you, for a lost cause. For a vile and wicked idea! For the sin of slavery! Can you hear them? God don’t mean people to own people, Gideon! Our time is near!

Unfortunately, we also see the in-over-his-head “actor” Joe Alwyn (also a Brit); I don’t know how he keeps getting roles! He plays Gideon Brodess, the slaveowner who grew up w/ (and maybe has a sort of obsession) w/ Harriet. Is it just about money (slaves were property), or is there something else going on? Perhaps worst of all (noted by several critics/casual viewers), is the cartoonish (Black) slavecatcher w/ the unfortunate name of Bigger Long (Omar Dorsey)- yikes!

[1] I attend a HBCU and have read, and studied, Harriet Tubman’s life. I don’t even know where to begin. There is no account of her ever standing with Union soldiers and pointing a gun. There are so many errors and what I saw on the screen was complete fiction.

[2] The scripting is insultingly lowbrow, almost patronizing. The acting talent has a good record in other productions, but in this film is unrealized due to the other problems. There are quite a few ahistoric, frankly false, events in this film which are not needed and make the film more a less than credible hagiography, as opposed to the plenty sufficient bravery, courage and strength of Tubman herself.

The film is not a total loss, but Tubman deserves better, much better, as do contemporary audiences.

[3] This is a standard biopic of anti-slavery heroine Harriet Tubman. It’s a serious take. The tone is singular which leaves the movie rather flat. I’m not calling for some broad jokes to inject silly humor or grotesque violence to horrify. The constant uninspired narrative can take a toll on the tension. The movie could push the intensity of the escapes. There are emotional power points, but they always seem a little melodramatic.

[4] If you want to see a REAL MOVIE on Harriet Tubman, look at the Cicely Tyson version: A Woman Called Moses.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews