Month: June 2024

“The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial” (1988 & 2023)

EmmaLeave a comment

The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (1988) starring Eric Bogosian, Jeff Daniels, & Brad Davis

This TV movie is an adaptation (originally staged as a play) of the court-martial segment from the novel The Caine Mutiny. The play premiered at the Plymouth Theatre in NYC on January 20, 1954. The original cast included Henry Fonda (Barney Greenwald), John Hodiak (Lt. Maryk) and Lloyd Nolan (Lt. Cdr. Queeg). James Garner appeared as a member of the court; he was the understudy to Hodiak. The play ran for 415 performances, closing on January 22, 1955. I know what some of y’all are thinking: there used to be smart movies on TV!? The script is V literate and gives most of us (civilians) insight into Naval protocol, attitudes, traditions, and conflicts btwn. personalities. As one viewer commented: “we see the usual [Robert] Altman technique of a lot of side conversations that are barely heard and added noises to make the film seem more naturalistic.”

Lt. Greenwald (Eric Bogosian- a theater actor/police capt. on L&O: CI) as the defense attorney sustains ambivalence; he does a good job, exuding caged-in intensity. As the defendant, Lt. Steven Maryk (Jeff Daniels) must decide whether his lawyer is capable or unreliable. The prosecutor, Lt. Cmdr. John Challee, is played by Peter Gallagher (a theater actor; D.A. on L&O: SVU). Lt. Cmdr. Queeg (Brad Davis) may be mentally ill; I hadn’t seen Davis before (he died at age 41 in 1991). Unlike in the remake (below), ethnicity/religion is mentioned (Greenwald is Jewish).

[1] Each “author” of the Caine mutiny is a plausible bad guy who lends slightly different emphases to instigators who escape blame for what they goad others into doing.

Davis’s Queeg raises the intriguing possibility that an officer might be flat-out nutty in a way difficult for psychiatrists to detect but easy for an attorney to expose. […] I agree that the caricature of the psychiatrist is hokey.

[2] …it is taught and claustrophobic for most of the story – being set in the court-martial room (a bit of the end of the play is at the post-trial acquittal party). The results is a different telling of the story, and one relying on the audience’s own evaluation of the truth or lies of the different witnesses.

…Queeg is first taken down a peg by Greenwald (Eric Bogosian) not on issues of fitness of command, but on his honesty.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (2023) starring Kiefer Sutherland, Jason Clarke, & Jake Lacy

Some of y’all (cinephiles) may’ve heard re: this one, as it was the last film directed by William Friedkin (who passed away at age 86 in AUG 2023). Lance Riddick (Capt. Luther Blakely) also passed away before the movie’s release; he’s a strong screen presence and gives a fine performance. For insurance purposes, Guillermo del Toro was the back-up director. Friedkin completed filming in 14 days (wow); he was given just 15 days by the studio! This movie (which was released on VOD) has well-known faces, as well as some newcomers; I saw it 1st on a flight last Thanksgiving.

Queeg (Kiefer Sutherland) here is much older (unlike in the original play by Herman Wouk); he has a constrained way of speaking here. The defense counsel, Greenwald (Jason Clarke- a prolific Aussie character actor), hasn’t practiced law much; he is the most fleshed out character. The no-nonsense prosecutor, Challee, is played by a young/Latina woman (Monica Raymund). Maryk is played by boy-next-door actor Jake Lacy (w/ big eyes/open face); he has lately done more on streaming shows than movies. I was a BIT disappointed, as I wanted to know more re: Keefer (Lewis Pullman- son of Bill Pullman; recently seen in Top Gun: Maverick). Keefer ended up writing a novel (based on this incident); it’s revealed that he influenced Maryk’s decisions.

[1] The original Caine Mutiny was a Humphrey Bogart led movie from 1954, one that I love and sticks in my memory very well. This takes notes form that movie, but is not really a remake, just an intensified treatise on the ending with the court martial hearing drug out and the final denouncement of the young opportunist shown his comeuppance. Anyone familiar with the source material, movie or book it was based on would know this. […]

The underlying theme of The Caine Mutiny story is not “wow that guy went crazy” – it’s that well, even the best among us can crack. There is no villain, it is all perspective, and even though a wrong decision was made by Caine himself the question is were there ulterior motives involved by other people.

[2] Yes, the ending could have been lengthened and strengthened a bit to really let the viewer know, but then again, here we have a Captain that does some outlandish things, but was that enough to justify a mutiny? You have to really decide the verdict. […]

Some people may have problems with the way the Navy is portrayed in this film, in that they don’t understand that as the captain of a US Navy vessel, one is completely and ultimately responsible for every little thing that happens on or to that boat, good or bad, and that as a result, discipline, rank, and orders must be maintained…

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Written on the Wind” (1956) starring Rock Hudson, Lauren Bacall, Robert Stack, & Dorothy Malone

EmmaLeave a comment

It was a masterpiece of suds. -Lauren Bacall, in an 2000 interview

In the Fall of 1955, a geologist working for Hadley Oil, Mitch Wayne (Rock Hudson), meets an executive secretary, Lucy Moore (Lauren Bacall), in their company’s office in NYC. He invites her to a lunch meeting at 21 Club w/ his best friend/famed playboy, Kyle Hadley (Robert Stack). Mitch and Kyle both fall hard for Lucy! Later that day, Kyle flies them all down (in his plane) to Miami; they check into a luxury hotel by the beach. Whoa, talk about love bombing! Kye shows Lucy her private suite, complete w/ glam clothes and accessories. However, none of this impresses her, so books a flight back to NYC. Kyle races to the airport, revealing his love for Lucy. They get married the next morning and travel to Acapulco; Kyle even gives up alcohol. Meanwhile, Kyle’s sister, Marylee (Dorothy Malone), is raising hell in their hometown (Hadley, TX). She loves Mitch desperately (though goes after other men), he sees Marylee as a sister.

Almost any other actor I know in the business… would have gone up to the head of the studio and said, “Hey, look, man, I’m the star – you cut this guy down or something.” But he never did. I never forgot that. -Robert Stack re: working w/ Rock Hudson

Rock gave me that sense of security whenever I worked with him. -Dorothy Malone (who won Best Supporting Actress Oscar in 1956 for her role) on her bond w/ Hudson

The source novel was based on the death of tobacco heir Zachary “Smith” Reynolds. Though Humphrey Bogart (husband of Bacall) didn’t like it, many modern critics consider Written on the Wind to be director Douglas Sirk’s best. Here we have an exploration of love, betrayal, and social status. The Village Voice referred to the film as “the original Technicolor noir” (OCT 1987). Sirk (born Hans Detlef Sierck; a native of Germany) is called “the master of melodrama;” he used bright colors in the visuals, lavish sets, and sweeping music. Without these types of movies, we perhaps wouldn’t have the soap operas of the ’80s (Dallas; Dynasty). The director and Hudson collaborated earlier on Magnificent Obsession (1954) and All that Heaven Allows (1955). Sirk stated that Kyle had homosexual leanings towards Mitch; this could NOT be mentioned (due to the Hays Code). The implication was so strong that 1956 audiences could read it either way; to today’s viewers, the subtext may be TOO obvious.

I just went and used my imagination, and I was doing DTs and madness and the six stages of drunkenness, and it was a good chance to truly prove that I could either do something pretty good or completely fall on my face. -Stack re: preparation for his role

Bacall and Hudson are an (unlikely) screen pair; she has the (rare) meek/underwritten role. Bacall later said she felt too old to play Lucy. Stack and Malone have the flashier roles; they’re undisciplined, insecure, and shameless siblings. It’s obvious that old/frail Mr. Hadley (Robert Keith) respects/depends on Mitch (unlike his son). Mitch wants to extricate himself from the (dysfunctional) Hadley family; he isn’t always strong. A clever viewer felt that the different cars reflected the personality of the characters. Kyle drives a yellow sports car- Allard J2X Le Mans- representing caution/potential danger. Marylee drives a red convertible-1955 Woodhall Wildfire Roadster- representing passion. In contrast to his flashy friends, Mitch drives a 1956 Plymouth convertible.

[1] WRITTEN ON THE WIND could be considered Sirk’s epic soap opera; indeed, it is so rife with human vulnerability and neurosis as depicted among the very rich that it is as compelling to watch as any real life domestic squabble among the rich and famous, perhaps more so.

[2] It is ironic that during the ’50s, when Douglas Sirk was at his most successful in terms of audience appeal, he was virtually ignored by the critics. He is now seen, however, as a director of formidable intellect who achieved his best work in melodrama.

[3] …the delivery is everything and the film succeeds in making the story and characters engaging. It is hard to describe well, but the story doesn’t really happen in reality, but rather in a sort of melodrama world of high emotions, and I didn’t expect it to draw me in.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Challengers” (2024) starring Zendaya, Josh O’Connor, & Mike Faist

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Challengers.

From visionary filmmaker Luca Guadagnino, “Challengers” stars Zendaya as Tashi Duncan, a former tennis prodigy turned coach and a force of nature who makes no apologies for her game on and off the court. Married to a champion on a losing streak (Mike Faist – “West Side Story”), Tashi’s strategy for her husband’s redemption takes a surprising turn when he must face off against the washed-up Patrick (Josh O’Connor – “The Crown”) – his former best friend and Tashi’s former boyfriend. As their pasts and presents collide, and tensions run high, Tashi must ask herself, what will it cost to win? -Synopsis (MGM)

Tashi: You don’t know what tennis is.

Patrick: What is it?

Tashi: It’s a relationship.

Patrick: Is that what you and Anna Mueller had today?

Tashi: It is, actually. For about fifteen seconds there, we were actually playing tennis. And we understood each other completely. So did everyone watching. It’s like we were in love. Or like we didn’t exist. We went somewhere really beautiful together.

Grab a snack (banana, breakfast sandwich, or churros) and watch this film from Italian director Luca Guadagnino and 1st time screenwriter Justin Kuritzkes (a playwright/hubby of Celine Song)! Josh O’Connor recently explained that Patrick taking a bite of Art’s churro was unscripted; he was starving (it was his 1st time eating churros). This movie was completed in April of 2023, but was delayed until April 26, 2024 due to the SAG-AFTRA strike. There are time jumps, BUT I didn’t find them hard to follow; the characters age from 18 to 32. While the two men are in love w/ Tashi, she’s more in love w/ tennis! After her injury in college shatters her dreams, she lives vicariously through Art.

Zendaya (who is also an EP) spent 3 mos. working w/ Brad Gilbert (former coach to Andre Agassi). On a break w/ family in Ohio, Faist decided to take tennis lessons for 4 wks. (before officially starting work). The trio had 3 wks. to rehearse in Boston w/ their director (V rare for today); this also helped create chemistry. Each actor worked out V seriously (as tennis players are quite fit athletes); they also had tennis doubles. The majority of the balls hit are CGI, as it was too difficult to achieve the cinematic style using real balls. You may wonder: Is that sweat (prominent in the movie) all real? According to O’Connor, the sweat on Faist was all his (as he worked out hardest on/off the court).

Art: Where does your swagger come from? I mean, you come in here swinging your dick around like I’m suppose to be afraid of it, but… Do you realize how embarrassing is that you are here right now?

Patrick: Not quite as embarrassing as you being here.

Art: I’m just stopping by, man. This is where you live.

Wow, what a burn (above) from Art! In the sauna scene before the (low stakes) Challenger event, Art gets the (rare) upper hand on Patrick. Though I thought all three co-leads did a FAB job, my fave was Patrick (the bad boy), and NOT just b/c of the curly/dark hair and amazing physique. Patrick is charming, self-deprecating, and (maybe) a better player than Art. However, Art is V disciplined w/ the way he lives his life; he lets Tashi steer his career. Back in the dorm room breakup scene btwn Tashi and Patrick, he exclaims: “I’m your peer!” So, he’s NOT the type of man who’s easy to influence/control. I’ve seen some of O’Connor’s movies/shows; he transforms himself for each role!

This feels/looks like a V modern film; it’s playful, sexy, and- sometimes- funny. There is V little nudity, BUT this movie is hot (one viewer was reminded of erotic thrillers)! Zendaya has a “no nudity” clause in all of her contracts. The score of this film (composed by Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross) is V effective, it contributes to make viewers tense (as if watching a thriller). Even though I’m NOT into this style of music (electronic), it really fit here!

[1] Wow, “Challengers” is the visual definition of a modern film. The rhythm of the scenes, the change of pace, the editing, the use of the score, the match camera, the variation of the time line. All of this merges into essentially two core concepts: Energy and aesthetics.

[2] Exhilarating. Energetic. Excellent.

Luca Guadagnino’s “Challengers” is a riveting, pulse-pounding, thrilling sports romance-drama that blew my mind. I loved, loved, LOVED “Challengers” – didn’t know what to expect, and walked out of the theater totally buzzing. It’s smart and sophisticated while still poppy and propulsive.

[3] …as usual, Guadagnino’s direction is a tour de force of exciting choices that push his actors to the limits of expression, presented to us against the backdrop of visually arresting aesthetics. The standout performances are definitely those of Zendaya and Josh O’Connor, but all three protagonists have an intense, seductive chemistry with one another that reads as so authentic, so fervent, so genuine, that the love scenes (which really only extend to kissing) caught me off guard.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Spoiler-Free Review: “The Promised Land” (2023) starring Mads Mikkelson, Amanda Collin, & Simon Bennebjerg

EmmaLeave a comment

A retired military captain, Ludvig Kahlen (Mads Mikkleson), arrives in 1755 on the barren Jutland (region of Denmark) w/ a single goal: to follow his king’s call to cultivate the heath, and thus get rich/earn a noble title. However, the wealthy/powerful/cruel landowner, Frederik De Schinkel (Simon Bennebjerg), believes that this heath belongs to him (NOT the king). To make matters more complicated, De Schinkel’s beautiful/unmarried cousin, Edel Helene (Kristine Kujath Thorp), comes to admire Kahlen. After two of De Schinkel’s servants, Johannes and Anna Barbara (Amanda Collin), run away and seek refuge w/ Kahlen, the landowner (also local judge) does everything to drive Kahlen away (and get revenge).

I heard about this movie while watching coverage (via YouTube) of the Venice Film Festival in Fall 2023. This film (Danish title: Bastarden) was the official submission of Denmark for Best International Feature Film at the 2024 Academy Awards. It was directed by Nikolaj Arcel and based on a novel by Ida Jessen (loosely inspired by real historical characters). If you miss “old-fashioned” epics (visually and thematically), then I highly recommend it; fans of the Western genre may also enjoy The Promised Land (available to rent on Amazon Prime). There are at least 2 scenes which I felt were callbacks to The Godfather; y’all can let me know IF you notice that. Mikkleson (who was a dancer for 8 yrs. before falling into acting) has great screen presence; he can do a LOT w/ just his eyes and facial expressions. Keep in mind that this is a time when men are trying to hold in emotions.

[1] …an engaging epic, a character study and a moving drama all in one. With a strong screenplay examining interesting themes, witty, minimalist dialogue and well-drawn characters, the narrative consistently engages. The cinematography and production design are striking, while the score is subtly powerful.

[2] This film uses all the tools of the Western genre: wide landscapes, settlers developing harsh lands, the fight against greed, injustice, cruelty and impunity of the ruling class, a stubborn loner who learns to follow his heart and old vs. new technologies (in this case- agricultural), settlers fighting rich landowners, racial prejudices and- of course- a showdown with a powerful obligatory scene.

[3] First of all Mads Mikkelsen is a phenomenal actor and the perfect choice to play Ludvig Kahlen. He shines especially in the scenes, where he “only” acts out pure emotion with his facial expressions without having to say a word. […]

Throughout the movie you feel all kinds of emotions yourself: anger, hatred, sadness, frustration, disgust, joy, relief,.. I felt it all. It is a rollercoaster ride of emotions.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Poor Things” (2023) starring Emma Stone, Mark Ruffalo, Willem Dafoe, Rami Youssef, Christopher Abbott, & Jerrod Carmichael

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Poor Things.

From filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos and producer Emma Stone comes the incredible tale and fantastical evolution of Bella Baxter (Stone), a young woman brought back to life by the brilliant and unorthodox scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe). Under Baxter’s protection, Bella is eager to learn. Hungry for the worldliness she is lacking, Bella runs off with Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo), a slick and debauched lawyer, on a whirlwind adventure across the continents. Free from the prejudices of her times, Bella grows steadfast in her purpose to stand for equality and liberation. -Synopsis from Searchlight Pictures)

Wow, what to say re: this movie!? It seems like viewers either loved it, hated it, or were simply confused! I saw it (on streaming) several mos. after it was released in theaters. Being always online (& a listener of movie pods) I learned a LOT about this before watching. I think there are some scenes that you can enjoy, IF you considered this an alternate universe (AU), a BIT like Bridgerton (Netflix). Well, it’s NOT always pretty like that Regency era show. The visual style is unique and eye-catching, as are the costumes and sets (part of production design). Now, Poor Things is NOT for those of y’all who are sensitive re: cursing, nudity, sex, and body horror (reminiscent at times of Canadian auteur David Cronenberg). The run time is TOO long, BUT that is not rare for recent films.

This is mostly a character study centered on Bella (Stone); she “grows up” from a toddler (as she has the brain of a child) to an adult young woman (capable of making her own choices). Do you think that Stone (who also produced this film) deserved that Oscar for Best Actress? Bella decides to to leaver her “father”- Dr. Godwin Baxter AKA “God” (Dafoe)- and start a romance w/ his lawyer, Duncan (Ruffalo). Sorry to say, Ruffalo is NOT working for me here; I’m a fan of his acting usually. Sometimes actors need to be pulled back by their directors, though I doubt Lanthimos asked for that. In the 2nd act, we meet a young American played by Carmichael; he’s a funny/smart stand-up, comedy writer, producer, etc. However, his style of acting/manner of speaking doesn’t fit w/in this world; it just took me out of the story. I thought that Dafoe and Youssef were quire good w/ all that they were given. Many weren’t amused by the way that sex work is handled in this movie; however, the filmmakers aren’t reflecting the real world. Feminism is NOT just about traveling or reading books- of course. No one can say that Lanthimos is risk-averse, that’s for sure! I was disappointed- that’s the conclusion.

[1] I do recommend this if you like the unusual art film. But I can see it as not being everyone’s idea of a fun time at the movies.

I might almost pair it up with “Barbie” as a thematic double feature as both films explore feminism in 2 very different ways.

[2] Completely over the top, mind boggling romp through the imagination of the main character on a journey of self-discovery and a relentless degree of self-indulgence.

[3] It’s a very very very specific type of weird, that won’t be for everyone. […] It’s like a fever dream on the strangest cocktail of psychedelics. If it happens to be your kind of weird, you will love it.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews