Category: 2023-2024

“May December” (2023) starring Natalie Portman, Julianne Moore, & Charles Melton

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie May December (2023) streaming on Netflix.

Gracie: I thought you were taller. You look taller on television, but we’re basically the same size.

Elizabeth: We’re basically the same.

Natalie Portman (who plays an actress named Elizabeth) brought the script to director Todd Haynes as a potential collab; he loved the script and suggested Julianne Moore (w/ whom he worked on 4 other films) for Gracie. This film was acquired by Netflix for $11M following its premiere at Cannes (May 2023). It was shot in 23 days on location in Savannah, Georgia. Charles Melton (Riverdale) gained 40 lbs. for his role as Joe. Melton’s mother is an immigrant from Korea; she met her white/American husband while he was serving overseas in the military. A prolific character/NYC theater actor, D. W. Moffett (Gracie’s ex-husband Tom), heads the film and TV dept. at the Savannah College of Art and Design; students from the acting program appear in the movie.

Joe: [to his son] God, I can’t tell if we’re connecting, or if I’m creating a bad memory for you in real time, but I can’t help it.

Gracie and Joe met at the pet store where they worked when she was 36 y.o. and he was 13 y.o. As some of you MAY recall, the story IRL was even more problematic: Vili Fualaau was only 12 y.o. and Mary Kay Letorneau (39 y.o.) was his teacher. The 3 lead characters are a LOT more complicated than they initially appear. We start at a backyard BBQ of a (seemingly happy) family headed by Gracie Atherton-Yoo (a baker in her 50s) and her handsome/36 y.o. husband, Joe Yoo (a X-ray tech). They have 3 teen children together; one daughter is in college and the twins (a boy and girl) are preparing to graduate H.S. Through Elizabeth’s eyes, we gradually begin to learn more about this couple. It’s hard to understand why Gracie acts the way she does. Can she truly be as naive as she acts? Joe is still a boy in his mind, though w/ an adult’s body and responsibilities. His kids are half his age, BUT seem to be more mature.

You’re kinda dangerous in this movie. I never knew what she [Gracie] was gonna do. -Annette Bening commented to Moore during Variety’s Actors on Actors interview

This story NOT only delves into the predatory relationship btwn Gracie and Joe, it also comments on how (self-important) actors can predatorily insert themselves into strangers’ lives. For a woman who has transgressed in a big way, Gracie is V concerned w/ appearances and image (publicly). She has a V feminine (girly) persona; she speaks sometimes w/ a lisp (a decision Moore made to sound younger). Weirdly, as she gets to know Gracie more, Elizabeth copies the lisp. Melton walks as if he’s being dragged forward by an unseen force; he often has his shoulders hunched (to make himself smaller). Elizabeth flirts w/ Joe when they’re alone at the hospital during her observation of his work life.

There is an unsettling kind of tension that permeates this movie. Though I loved the acting (incl. from the kids), I was NOT a fan of the (cheesy) soundtrack. Haynes chose it from a ’70s drama he discovered. The (grainy/sun-drenched) visual style works here IMO, though it may be unappealing to some viewers. Is this supposed to be a comedy or a drama? As I was watching, I thought it had elements of a dark comedy. There are unexpected scenes, though I did guess what happened at the climax. Check it out for yourself!

[1] …this is a very well done movie about adults who are really just children. They never healed from their traumas and what ensues is a vision of how life is when you ignore that stuff. […]

The movie is for people that love film as art – not narrative. It is very well done. All the acting is based on nuanced subtext. The score and the cinematography are also very well done (I love slow zooms…sue me).

[2] Elizabeth is polite and apologetic as she initially treads carefully in asking probing questions of the family and their friends. Her approach generates some awkward moments, and although Gracie seems to hold firmly to her did-nothing-wrong stance, it’s Joe who begins to question things… mimicking the slow development of the Monarch butterflies he breeds.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Passages” (2023) starring Franz Rogowski, Ben Whishaw, & Adele Exarchopoulos

Emma2 Comments

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Passages (2023) streaming on MUBI.

…a form of cultural censorship that is quite dangerous, particularly in a culture which is already battling, in such extreme ways, the possibility of LGBT imagery to exist. -Ira Sachs (co-writer/director) on the NC-17 rating given to the film by the MPAA

At the wrap party for his latest movie, 30-something director, Tomas (Franz Rogowski- a German actor), celebrates w/ his hubby, Martin (Ben Whishaw- a British character actor), the film crew, and their guests. Among these guests is a 20-ish teacher, Agathe (Adèle Exarchopoulos- a Frenchwoman), who invites Tomas to dance. Soon, the two begin an affair, which puts strain on the relationship btwn Tomas, Martin, and their wider social circle.

I really liked how in this story the 3rd person is a woman. Because it shows how awkward it is to maybe try to have that balance of freedom and being open to people exploring, but also wanting traditional needs met. […]

He [Tomas] is not interested in making anyone else comfortable but himself.

-Excerpts from YouTube video by Jelly Fish Reviews (8/1/23)

This indie film was rejected by both Cannes and the Venice film fests; it had its world premiere at Sundance. Ira Sachs (who is American) and the film’s distributor, MUBI, rejected the NC-17 rating; it was released in theaters (unrated) in AUG 2023. I heard some positive things from media critics I follow, so had high hopes for this movie. I think many ppl are hungry for mature dramas w/ serious themes. This story has a V unusual/interesting premise, BUT there is little in the way of character development. Polyamory is NOT a topic we see discussed much in media.

The unlikeable protagonist (NOT a hero) doesn’t grow/learn/change by the end. FYI: Ragowski speaks w/ a lisp, which is his natural speaking manner (hard to understand at times IF you’re not using subtitles). Tomas is a narcissist who causes havoc w/ his words/actions wherever he goes. Some viewers commented that he isn’t “conventionally handsome”; Tomas has a patchy beard, gaunt features, dresses in mismatched clothing, and moves in a “snake-like manner.” We may wonder why Martin (a successful artist/business owner) and Agathe (an independent-minded/strong woman) found him SO appealing! After all, it’s easier for the audience to relate when a baddie IF he also happens to be a hottie (i.e. Brando in Streetcar; Newman in Hud).

The visual style of the film is NOT impressive; there are even scenes where the framing seems off and a character is hidden from view (while speaking). There are no camera “tricks,” which could’ve made this film a BIT more effective. The pacing is slow and I didn’t sense tension building as the story went on; there are common issue in (modern) movies. As for the “controversial” scenes, the sex looks “animalistic” (NOT romantic), as a few viewers commented. I saw little passion/connection btwn the characters.

[1] Not all films need to be message driven, but I think any director or writer makes a film because they have something to say. In that sense, I’m not sure what ‘Passages’ wanted to say.

[2] …a rather dull introspective of characters that didn’t really leap off the screen at me. […] The production and pacing all contribute to the general ennui of the whole thing and to be honest, I was just a bit disappointed with this whole thing.

[3] Without style, the absence of substance dominates this lackluster experience.

[4] The movie transcends type and finds the truth in its relationships, it dotes on and suffers with its protagonists in a manner that does feel intimate, both emotionally and physically.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Fair Play” (2023) starring Phoebe Dynevor & Alden Ehrenreich

Emma1 Comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Fair Play (2023) streaming on Netflix.

Competition is Close. -A tagline for the movie

[1] Fair Play is about the sort of guy a lot of women are uncomfortably familiar with – the one who’s perfect until he’s not, who’s an ally as long as he stays in power. 

[2] I really liked the concept, and the story up to a point, but then it careens off the rails, and becomes something altogether different. By the end, it has taken one of the leads into a place that is barely believable, and borderline absurd.

[3] It’s about how a loss in traditional balance sends a couple into their dark side.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Emily (Phoebe Dynevor: 28 y.o.) and Luke (Alden Ehrenreich: 33 y.o.) are a smart/ambitious couple who’ve been dating for 2 yrs; they live in a spacious apt. in NYC’s Chinatown. They decide to get engaged, BUT keep their relationship a secret, as they both work as traders in the same investment firm. Suddenly, a position of PM (portfolio manager) opens up, when a co-worker is let go w/o warning (NOT unusual in this cut-throat field). Everyone in the (glass-filled/open plan) office is buzzing re: who’ll get the promotion; Emily assumes that Luke will be the one (and is happy about it). Late one night, Emily gets a (mysterious-sounding) call from a PM, Rory (Sebastien De Souza). She goes to a (speakeasy-style) bar; their boss is sitting there instead of Rory. Campbell (Eddie Marsan) reveals to Emily that he has chosen her as the new PM!

As y’all regular readers (and Twitter pals) know, I was anticipating this film for quite some time. This is the 1st movie written/directed by an American woman in her 30s, Chloe Domont; the rights were bought by Netflix for $20M. The setting is NYC (Manhattan), it was primarily shot in Serbia; Domont chose that location as it allowed her to build the sets according to her specifications. The co-leads of the movie are two up-and-comers in Hollywood: Dynevor (a Brit best known for the Netflix series Bridgerton) and Ehrenreich (an American who starred in Solo: A Star Wars Story; he recently had a supporting role in Oppenheimer). The rest of the (international/mostly male) cast are NOT well-known; they portray Americans. When it comes to the relationship element, it was effective; the leads have good chemistry (make a believable couple) and are well-suited physically. When it came to the workplace, it fell short; my mind would wander off. (I’ve known ppl who worked in finance when I lived in NYC.) The frenetic energy of NYC is missing; that is an element you can’t fake. One critic said that Lynbrook (where Emily grew up) is “a nice/middle-class town” on Long Island; Campbell made it sound like a hole to crawl out of.

This is NOT an erotic thriller, as you may’ve assumed from the marketing; however, it does contain elements of the genre. The central issue here is the fragility of the male ego. Today, there are some women who earn more than their (male) partners; this could be a point of friction in relationships. Though she never worked in finance, Domont based this story partly on her own life; she said that she “made herself small in some dating relationships” (when she had success professionally). After Emily is promoted, the relationship btwn her and Luke starts to break down. Tension builds and continues to grow in their interactions. Luke makes snide/mean comments, loses interest in sex, and gets obsessed w/ the teachings of a business guru (reminded me of Don’t Worry Darling). Emily changes her style and navigates the world of the PMs (act like “one of the guys”). In the 3rd act, Luke goes into a tailspin which came off as extreme (and unexpected) for many viewers. Do you think that any man can become a rapist? Honestly, I have to say no! There is one scene in the finale which may be troubling and (possibly) triggering to some viewers.

Spoiler-Free Review: “Barbie” (2023) starring Margot Robbie & Ryan Gosling

Emma3 Comments

Barbie suffers a crisis that leads her to question her world and her existence. -Synopsis

She’s everything. He’s just Ken. -Tagline

Summer has (traditionally) been the season for family-friendly/crowd-pleasing movies. As you may know, both Barbie and Oppenheimer were released on the same day (July 21) of this yr. I went to see Barbie w/ a big group of (mostly) women during its 2nd wknd at AMC (Ballston Quarter). One of my friends was esp. excited; she purchased 10 tickets (limit per person) several wks. ahead of our screening. I was somewhat curious, b/c I really liked the work of director/co-writer Greta Gerwig (who turned 40 y.o. last wk) and Noah Baumbach (co-writer); they’re also partners IRL and have a baby together. Gerwig and Baumbach are also close friends/collaborators w/ Adam Driver. Some skeptical critics wondered: “Who is the audience for this movie?” As I expected, my theater was full w/ (mostly) women in their 20s-40s; many were wearing pink (in various shades).

The production design is V cool; you feel immersed in the material/colorful world of Mattell toys where “Stereotypical Barbie” (Robbie), her love interest, Ken (Gosling), and all their friends live. As we saw in the trailers/ads, there are Barbies and Kens of diverse backgrounds (Issa Rae, Simu Liu, Kingsley Ben-Adir, Kate McKinnon. etc.) Alan (Michael Cera), Midge, and a few other (NOT so well-known) dolls are also there. Women are the ones who hold ALL the important jobs in this (make-believe) world! Of course, there are several human characters (played by America Ferrera, Ariana Greenblatt, Will Ferrell, etc. ) A much younger Greenblatt (now 15 y.o.) was Driver’s co-star in the action movie 65 (2023). The eclectic music suits the story well; I was NOT familiar w/ all the songs. Yes, this movie has a feminist take (as I’m sure many are aware). It also includes singing and dancing (which reminded me of technicolor musicals). There are many LOL moments, yet there are emotional/touching ones also. I hadn’t seen much of Gosling’s acting; I was surprised by how funny he could be! I do think this movie was a BIT too long; this is a common problem today. There are also a few speeches; they are NOT all effective IMO. I think a wide audience (IF they keep an open mind) can enjoy this movie; it already passed the $1B mark worldwide – wow! Two of my (mid-20s; male and female) co-workers really liked the movie; they went on opening wknd.