“Mutiny on the Bounty” (1935) & “The Bounty” (1984)

EmmaLeave a comment

Mutiny on the Bounty (1935)

Y’all probably know this (classic) story: while sailing from England to Jamaica (West Indies), 1st mate Fletcher Christian (Clark Gable) leads a revolt against his sadistic commander, Captain Bligh (Charles Laughton); this is based on a real-life 1789 mutiny. This is the only film to receive 3 Oscar noms for Best Actor: Gable, Laughton, and Franchot Tone (who plays midshipman/linguist Lt. Roger Byam). After this occurred, the MPA introduced a Best Supporting Actor Oscar to ensure this situation wouldn’t be repeated. These actors all lost to Victor McLaglen for The Informer (1935). Check this movie out (free on streaming) IF you’re a fan of B&W films &/or Gable. No, he doesn’t use an English accent here (as he’s playing a version of himself– a dashing Hollywood star). For the more natural performance, see Tone’s portrayal as a newbie sailor.

[1] “Mutiny On the Bounty” is a well-made movie, with one of the best musical scores I have heard. […] Strong performances, great camera work, a well-written script, and an astounding musical score. All in all, this is a movie worth seeing!

[2] Gable always carried with him a touch of the theatre where he cut his teeth, and proves himself a powerful counterpoint to the blustering Charles Laughton. With his barrel chest, wavy hair and easygoing swagger he does have the makings of a swashbuckling hero, and this is the role Fletcher Christian takes in this adventuresome adaptation. […]

Charles Laughton’s performance as Captain Bligh is integral to the movie. You realise here that Laughton was rather a short man, and he plays on this, making Bligh a jumped-up, Napoleon-complexed bully: all sharp, jabbing motions, an arrogant stance and a face like a dead fish.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

The Bounty (1984)

The cast here is headed by Anthony Hopkins (as the experienced naval officer- Bligh) and rising star Mel Gibson (as his young friend turned adversary- Christian); it also incl. future stars Daniel Day-Lewis (a cautious officer- Fryer) and Liam Neeson (as , hot-headed sailor- Churchill). Gibson brought on fellow Aussie, Roger Donaldson, as the director. A replica of the H.M.S. Bounty was built for the movie (w/ steel hull). It was originally set to be filmed in 1975 w/ David Lean as director. The production values are high and the settings are gorgeous. Hey, who wouldn’t be impressed w/ sunsets, Gibson (w/ shirt open), and DDL’s steely glare? So what went wrong w/ this movie!? The two leads shared their thoughts below.

I think the main problem with that film was that it tried to be a fresh look at the dynamic of the mutiny situation, but didn’t go far enough. In the old version, Captain Bligh was the bad guy and Fletcher Christian was the good guy. But really Fletcher Christian was a social climber and an opportunist. They should have made him the bad guy, which indeed he was. He ended up setting all these people adrift to die, without any real justification. Maybe he’d gone island crazy. They should have painted it that way. But they wanted to exonerate Captain Bligh while still having the dynamic where the guy was mutinying for the good of the crew. It didn’t quite work. -Mel Gibson

It was such a sad mess of a film, such a botched job. Yet I’d put so much time and effort into the role. So right then and there I decided: Never again. I will no longer invest so much effort in something over which I have no control. It’s too frustrating. That film was a sort of turning point for me. For years I’d been trying to cultivate a don’t-give-a-damn attitude. After watching “The Bounty” I knew I had it. -Anthony Hopkins

Though the film was made on time and w/in budget, the production was troubled. Hopkins and Donaldson clashed over how Bligh should be characterized. Gibson was getting drunk after the shooting day ended; one night, he was injured in a bar fight- yikes! I think his acting is fine; his English accent is believable. Hopkins (who had quit alcohol many yrs ago) is giving it 100%, as we’d expect, so that Bligh becomes less of a “bad guy.” Neeson gets a few good scenes; he made the best of his experience, I’m sure. DDL doesn’t have much to do until the last act; he has a strong screen presence. I expected there to be more of a build-up to the mutiny. The Tahiti scenes go on too long, as many critics/viewers have noted. A LOT of folks seem to have complaints re: the soundtrack, BUT it didn’t bother me.

“Paris, 13th District” (2021) starring Lucie Zhang, Makita Samba, & Noemie Merlant

EmmaLeave a comment

Émilie meets Camille who is attracted to Nora, who crosses paths with Amber. Three girls and a boy – they’re friends, sometimes lovers and often both. -Synopsis

The movie opens w/ a Rear Window-like scene w/ a couple singing karaoke in the nude. We are then informed, “It began like this.” A woman in her mid-20s, Emilie Wong (Lucie Zhang), works in telemarketing; her side income comes from renting out a room in her 2bd. apt. She wants a female roommate, only this Camile Germain (Makita Samba) turns out to be a male teacher working on his PhD. There is a spark btwn the pair; she agrees to let him move in. Later on, we meet a 30-ish woman who is new to the area, Nora Ligier (Noemie Merlant from Portrait of a Lady on Fire), who is V excited to return to law school. Things don’t go as Nora expected, so she goes back to a role she knows- real estate agent.

I’ve fallen in love with people on screens before I’ve ever met them, so I can understand it. -Noemie Merlant (when asked how she related to her character)

This is an adaptation of 3 stories from Optic Nerve, a comic book series by Adrian Tomine. Three days before shooting began, the movie was acted on a Paris stage, as a rehearsal, in order to see what worked and what didn’t. This was also to speed up the shoot and limit COVID-19 exposure for cast/crew. The movie was filmed during the COVID pandemic; director Jacques Audiard said they took a lot of protective restrictions w/ constant testing. Audiard commented on the peculiarity of the situation, when most people were avoiding contact, the two stars would come on set, strip off their clothes, and climb into bed naked together.

The French title (Les Olympiades) refers to the Parisian district where the story takes place; it is a group of high-rises built in the ’70s (known as the largest “Chinatown” in Europe). The movie is shot in black & white, which may NOT appeal to younger audiences. A French viewer said that it made this (NOT so pretty) area look better. The (diverse) characters are rare to see in French movies, as some viewers commented. We realize that Emilie (the lead) is a BIT abrasive; this is rare for modern movies. Camile is brainy, yet avoids emotions; he doesn’t think sex (incl. friends w/ benefits situations) is a big deal. I think that the relationship btwn Nora and the cam girl was interesting; they start out as online friends. As a whole, it’s an under-cooked story. There is a LOT of nudity/sex; this will push away sensitive viewers. I was wondering: “Where is the chemistry and sensuality that we expect from French media?” I just didn’t buy it!

[1] The truly bilingual and bicultural reality of the main character here- Émilie- is awesome to watch- the switching between the 2 worlds between Voltaire and Kong Fu Tzu without even a blink. All the actors here are excellent and Audiard has produced yet another minor masterpiece…

[2] This film is not about millennials’ life in Paris, it’s about what an old man apparently- completely out of touch with the youth- imagines it to be. Dialogs sounds completely fake throughout. Parisian millennial friends and I spent the whole movie laughing at the innumerable absurdities.

The only thing that sounds sincere is the relationship between Nora and Amber.

[3] I was very disappointed with this movie. […] The actors are OK, but their characters are superficial, and I couldn’t care less of what happens to them. Even the black and white is not pretty. I think it was selected for Cannes 2021 only because of the reputation of Audiard.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Hail, Caesar!” (2016) starring Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Alden Ehrenreich, Ralph Fiennes, Scarlett Johansson, Tilda Swinton, & Channing Tatum

EmmaLeave a comment

This movie follows a day in the life of Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin), a Hollywood “fixer” in the ’50s; he cleans up messes made by actors under contract at Capitol Pictures. When the movie studio’s biggest star, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney) disappears, Mannix has to deal w/ more than just the fix. This movie was written/directed by Joel and Ethan Coen; the brothers had been brainstorming the story for a decade, BUT never wrote anything. After Clooney (known for his practical jokes) announced Hail, Caesar! as his next project at a press conference, the Coens (who received a LOT of publicity), decided to make the film for real! There was real studio exec (E.J. Mannix) who worked as a producer/fixer at MGM. One of his contributions to motion picture history is a ledger w/ the budget and income of every film made at MGM from 1924-1962.

[Eddie has gathered several clergymen to get their opinions on how the issue of God should be handled in the Hail Caesar! movie]

Protestant Minister: God loves everyone!

Catholic Priest: God is love!

Eastern Orthodox Priest: God is who he is.

Rabbi: This is special? Who isn’t who he is?

Catholic Priest: But, how should God be rendered in a motion picture?

Rabbi: God isn’t in the motion picture!

Hail, Caesar! (the movie w/in this movie) paid several tributes to Ben-Hur (1959); one scene shows Baird (playing a Roman general; based on actor Victor Mature) becoming speechless at the sight of Jesus. DeeAnna Moran (Scarlett Johansson) is loosely based on swimmer turned actress, Esther Williams, who starred in musicals for MGM w/ elaborate sets, synchronized swimming, and high diving. To prep for playing Hobie Doyle (based on Will Rogers), Alden Ehrenreich learned horseback riding, rope tricks, gun twirling, and guitar- wow! The actor felt twirling the spaghetti (to mimic a lasso) was the hardest part; Hobie does that on his date w/ Carlotta Valdez (Veronica Osario- a Venezuelan-American actress). As Hitchcock fans will notice, Carlotta Valdez is also the name of a historical character mentioned in Vertigo (1958). Carlotta is based on Brazilian singer/dancer/Bdwy actress, Carmen Miranda (AKA “The Brazilian Bombshell” or “The Chiquita Banana”). Twin sisters/celeb columnists, Thora and Thessaly Thacker (Tilda Swinton), may be based on Ann Landers and her twin sister, Abigail Van Buren (AKA Dear Abby).

Hobie Doyle [repeating the line]: Would that it were so simple?

I’d recommend this to fans of classic films (like me), though it’s NOT a cohesive movie as a whole, it has several FAB scenes! As a fan of the Coens’ work commented: “They travel from universe to universe remaining true to themselves.” The scene btwn Ehrenreich (the standout among the large ensemble cast) and Ralph Fiennes (who plays British director Laurence Laurentz) is hilarious! The tap dance w/ Channing Tatum is a LOT of fun; he looks light on his feet and graceful. I’m sure many viewers will be surprised! Clooney is NOT afraid to portray the pathetic side of some Hollywood stars. If you are looking for LOL moments, those are few; there is plenty to smile (or chuckle) at.

[1] Quirky and lingering, that’s the Coen brothers way […]

…if you’re obsessed with cinema (I know I am), intrigued by the ins and outs of Hollywoodland lingo, and want to revel in the Coen brothers strutting their movie within a movie pedigree, then Hail, Caesar! will cure your wintry blues. All I gotta say is “hail” yes!

[2] It was as if the Coen Brothers simply said “let’s do a film for ourselves…who cares whether or not the public enjoys it or not!”. I appreciated it myself…but I am also not the average film-goer. As for the average viewer, the film makes allusions to many events in the history of Hollywood… but if you aren’t aware of these events or rumors, you’ll not understand or appreciate much of the film.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“10 Cloverfield Lane” (2016) starring John Goodman, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, & John Gallagher, Jr.

EmmaLeave a comment

After getting into a car accident, Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), awakens to find herself in an underground bunker w/ two men- Howard (John Goodman) and Emmett (John Gallagher, Jr). Howard offers her crutches to help move (w/ her leg injury from the crash); he tells her to “get good on those” before leaving. She is told that there has been an attack and the outside world is poisoned! However, Howard’s intentions soon become questionable. Michelle wonders: Is it better in here or try top get outside?

Howard: People are strange creatures. You can’t always convince them that safety is in their best interest.

I came across this film recently while browsing; I think it’s still streaming for free. I’m NOT an expert on modern horror; these movies are often shot quickly w/ low budgets. Teens/20s viewers seem to watch these more in theaters, from what I’ve observed/heard. There are some classic horror films which I still haven’t seen. I was impressed w/ the pacing (editing) and direction of this movie. Dan Trachtenberg, who now mainly works in TV, earned a Directors Guild of America Award (DGA) nom for Outstanding Directing – First-Time Feature Film. The screenplay was written by Josh Campbell, Matt Stueken, and Damien Chazelle (who most recently directed Babylon).

Emmett: We’re here. We’re alive. That means something… It’s gotta.

We know Goodman (a veteran character actor) is always good in every role; he creates an (unexpected) villain. I’d seen Gallagher, Jr. (who also has a career in folk music) in The Newsroom; he plays a farm boy-next-door who regrets missing out on college. Michelle and Emmett (a good guy) form a friendship bond, which Howard is angered (and perhaps threatened) by. I learned that different tonal versions of most scenes were shot (from light/humorous to angry), so filmmakers could find the right mix in the end. I enjoyed the story a LOT until the ending- it wasn’t what I expected at all!

[1] It’s incredibly compelling mainly because of its intense focus on character, while it’s the several subtle twists and turns that keep us on the edge of our seat as our reading of the situation (always seen through the lens of the protagonist) continues to organically change.

[2] There are little if any horror elements in this movie. […] Those of you looking for a tense, slow building atmosphere are going to love this one! This is primarily a mystery movie.

[3] This film done everything right in terms of keeping you on edge, building tension and keeping you guessing. You feel just as confused and vulnerable as the protagonist and have no idea where everything is leading. But then, out of nowhere, it suddenly takes a sharp turn down towards WTF-ville and completely kills everything that it worked hard to build over the duration of the film.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Love Crime” (2010) starring Ludivine Sagnier, Kristin Scott Thomas, & Patrick Mille

EmmaLeave a comment

An elegant business exec, Christine Rivière (Kristin Scott Thomas- who speaks fluent French), brings on Isabelle Guérin (Ludivine Sagnier) as her protege. Christine seems to enjoy toying w/ the young/naive woman. Christine is involved w/ Phillipe (Patrick Mille), an arrogant/charming lawyer who consults w/ this company. Soon, Isabelle’s ideas become creative enough for Christine to pass off as her own. In time, we see that Christine has underestimated Isabelle’s ambition/cunning!

As one viewer commented, this is “not a whodunit, but more of a what’s-she-gonna-do next” story. I heard about this French neo noir film on the Fatal Attractions podcast. Alain Corneau (1943-2010) was a Cesar Award-winning French writer/director; he died soon after Love Crime was released. The American remake (undercooked and boring) was titled Passion (2012); it was directed by Brian De Palma and stars Rachel McAdams and Noomi Rapace. If you like this movie, you may want to check out The Business of Strangers (2001) starring Stockard Channing and Julia Stiles.

The French ain’t like us (Americans) y’all- that can be surprising (yet refreshing) to watch! They don’t need big budgets, expensive sets, action scenes, or likeable lead characters. They also don’t carry the (Puritan) baggage when is comes to nudity, sex, or relationships btwn men and women. After a meeting out of town, Isabelle jumps into Phillipe’s arms and kisses him w/ fervor (looks a BIT aggressive). These women are battling it out in (and out) of the boardroom! The filmmakers don’t shy away from melodrama. If you like psychological thrillers, then I recommend this movie.

…Mr. Corneau makes witty use of the contrasting faces and temperaments of the two main actresses. Ms. Thomas, her manner as impeccable and dry as her French, is all angles and edges, most terrifying when she seems most at ease. Ms. Sagnier, soft and skittish and visibly struggling to maintain her composure, turns out to be even scarier.

-Excerpt from NYT review by A.O. Scott

[1] The narrative style is one of omniscient point of view. As an audience, you are along with the perpetrator for a ride all the time. The fun is in seeing (and sometimes guessing) how she uses the “self-framing” trick (think “The Wrong Man,” but in that movie the audience is in the dark and are in for a big surprise, unless they are really smart) to get away with murder, literally.

[2] What makes the film so fascinating is the clever move/countermove screenplay that provides tantalizing hints increasing skullduggery. The two female leads play beautifully off each other and the hapless men that get in their way are interesting in their own right.

[3] …here we have real human action. With women as the characters, “action” does not have to constitute external phenomena as is the case with men. For women, “action” is the deadly silent conflict between personalities, and how they outwit each other. This is a true “psychological thriller,” whereas many claims of that kind are made by films which are not all that psychological.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews