Hitchcock’s “Foreign Correspondent” (1940) starring Joel McCrea, Laraine Day, Herbert Marshall, & George Sanders

The Thrill Spectacle of the Year! -Tagline for the film

Johnny Jones (Joel McCrea) is a crime reporter at a NYC newspaper- The Globe. The editor suddenly appoints him as an European correspondent; he wants a man who’s a clean slate (doesn’t know much re: world affairs). Jones’ 1st assignment is to get the inside story on a secret treaty agreed btwn 2 European countries by a famous Dutch diplomat- Mr. Van Meer (Albert Bassermann). Things don’t go according to plan; Jones enlists an idealistic young woman, Carol Fischer (Laraine Day), help to track down a group of spies. This is Hitchcock’s 2nd American movie; he has a big budget (and it shows in the impressive sets). Rebecca (a huge hit) was also released in 1940. You can watch this movie on Max (new name for HBO Max).

Scott ffolliott: One of my ancestors was beheaded by Henry VIII. His wife dropped the capital letter to commemorate it. There it is.
John Jones: How do you say it, like a stutter?
Scott ffolliott: No, just a straight “fuh.”

To modern eyes, this is a lesser-known Hitchcock film; we find a LOT of his trademarks (which he improved upon later). It’s a BIT long for a classic at 2 hrs; the pacing was slow in some scenes (which is NOT unexpected). It’s an unique blend of comedy and drama; the lighthearted tone in one scene is followed by a more serious (darker) one. The word “Nazi” is never used, BUT we know where the threat is coming from. The 1st choice for the lead was Gary Cooper, BUT he turned it down; he later admitted to Hitchcock that he regretted that decision. Thrillers didn’t have the best reputation at that time. McCrea plays it easy/understated (as he often did in his roles); he has good banter w/ Day. In one action scene, he scales the outside of a hotel in a robe (flashing a LOT of leg). Stephen Fischer (Herbert Marshall) is the most interesting character; he’s clever, witty, charming, yet mysterious. George Sanders gets to play a good guy (which is rare for him); I got a kick out of that. Robert Benchley (also one of the scriptwriters) is V funny as the (experienced) London correspondent who’d rather be drinking.

[1] Though lacking the star power of some of the great director’s more famous movies, the cast is very good, the settings are wonderfully conceived, and the story and writing keep the viewer’s attention at all times. It has everything we hope for from Hitchcock: action, suspense, and a good dose of humor.

[2] …a film which coincidentally carries Hitchcock’s boldest political statement: That neutrality doesn’t work when others are bent on war. […]

Some back in Great Britain complained Hitchcock’s leaving his native country as it faced Hitler all alone was desertion, but Hitchcock was doing all he could for King and Country, as “Foreign Correspondent” pulls all the stops to shake American viewers from their neutrality.

Hitchcock is very careful in presenting the bad guys. He never says they’re Germans, though the implication is obvious. The chief baddie is ruthless but not without decent impulses…

[3] Notice especially the excellence of the exterior set—the sky, the windmills— these visuals are exceptional for a sound stage creation.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Fugitive” (1993) starring Harrison Ford & Tommy Lee Jones

Dr. Richard Kimble, unjustly accused of murdering his wife, must find the real killer while being the target of a nationwide manhunt led by a seasoned U.S. Marshal. -Synopsis

The studio was not happy with the beard. They figured they paid for the face they wanted to see, so they were concerned about that. -Harrison Ford on his look (in the 1st act of the movie)

I re-watched this movie (released 30 yrs ago this week) recently- it still holds up! It was the 3rd highest-grossing movie in the US in 1993; it was (surprisingly) nominated for MANY awards. There is NOT a lot of dialogue and the story is quite simple, BUT the pacing, build-up of tension, and exciting (and memorable) action scenes keep viewers interested. The focus is mainly on two good guys- Dr. Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford) and the US Marshals lead by Deputy Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones)- so we want to root for both sides. Ford (who was looking for a challenge) gives an understated performance; however, you see the determination in the hard-set of his jaw and various emotions in his eyes. Remember that in reality, MOST people are trying to hold in their emotions (NOT expressing them openly). Jones has the flashier role (earning him an Oscar as Best Supporting Actor); his character got a spin-off movie- U.S. Marshals. Gerard (a veteran lawman) shows confidence bordering on arrogance, BUT he can also be funny. As we are taken on a cat-and-mouse chase, these two adversaries gain respect for each other.

Dr. Richard Kimble: [Holding Gerard at gunpoint] I didn’t kill my wife!
Deputy Marshal Samuel Gerard: I don’t care!

Andrew Davis (director) convinced the producers to let him shoot (on location) in Chicago; the weather was V cold during the 73-day shoot (which posed challenges). I learned that some of the dialogue was improvised by Ford and Jones. The St. Patrick’s Day parade scene was also improvised; it took several mins. for Ford to be recognized among the crowd. Ford damaged some ligaments in his leg during the scenes in the woods; he refused surgery until the end of filming (so that his character would keep the limp)- ouch! At age 50, Ford is in great shape (as we see in the shirtless scenes where he bandages his wound, then changes into civilian clothes). The supporting players do a good job in this movie: Sela Ward, Joe Pantoliano, Julianne Moore, Jane Lynch, Andreas Katsulas, Jeroen Krabbe, and others. Moore (the young ER doc) had a bigger role; these scenes were filmed/deleted from the final cut. (FYI: If you want to hear more re: Ford’s movies, check out The Fordcast podcast.)

“The Fabulous Baker Boys” (1989) starring Jeff Bridges, Michelle Pfeiffer, & Beau Bridges


For 31 years it’s been just the Fabulous Baker Boys… but times change. -Tagline for the movie

This movie (free on YT in HD quality) focuses on a Seattle piano lounge act performing jazz versions of famous pop songs. The older brother, Frank (Beau Bridges), is married w/ 2 kids and the business manager, front man, and programmer of the playlist. The younger brother, Jack (Jeff Bridges), is carefree w/o commitments; he has one-night stands (mainly w/ cocktail waitresses). Jack has an old black Lab dog (Eddie) and a pre-teen upstairs neighbor (Nina) who lives w/ her single mom (busy dating various men). The Baker Boys’ act is becoming stale; they’re losing the ability to hold onto what gigs they had. Dave Grusin recorded the songs for the soundtrack, BUT Beau and Jeff both learned to play all the songs. To make their playing look realistic, they watched videos of Grusin’s hands playing the music.

Frank comes up w/ the idea of hiring a female singer. After 37 bad auditions, they finally hire Susie Diamond (Michelle Pfeiffer- who sings all her songs); she is rough around the edges and a former escort. Despite Susie having no formal singing experience, she has good enough vocals and can sell a song. She turns off her tough girl attitude when performing; she becomes vulnerable. Soon, they begin getting better gigs and earning more money. Frank thinks the biggest threat is the sexual tension (real or imagined) btwn Jack and Susie. However, the main threat is how Susie is able to expose the (existing) rifts btwn the brothers; Frank’s goal is to provide for his family, while Jack wants to pursue his own musical dreams.

They just don’t make films like this anymore (for the big screen)! It’s a 3-person character drama, NOT unlike what you’d see onstage. The writer (also 1st time director), Steve Kloves, had shown the script to (IRL friend) Pfeiffer 3 yrs. before it was made. Kloves mainly worked as a screenwriter afterwards; he did a fine job here. The film was released in SEPT 1989 in only 800 theaters; it sold out in NYC, Chicago and LA (thanks to word of mouth). There was NOT much money spent by the studio (Fox) on advertising.

I love them- both the Bridges brothers! -Michelle Pfeiffer on Inside the Actors Studio

Some critics (of ALL genders) commented: “This is Jeff Bridges looking his hottest.” Most of the time, Jack (an anti-hero) is wearing a black tux open at the collar. Susie has a variety of dresses, ranging from trashy to elegant. They BOTH have great hair, too! The audience is anxious for them to get together, BUT they need time (as they are guarded emotionally). The Fabulous Baker Boys is a must-see film w/ intelligent dialogue, great acting, and sparkling chemistry. There is a sense of authenticity; the settings are NOT always glam and the characters are multi-layered.

“Mulholland Falls” (1996) starring Nick Nolte, Melanie Griffith, & Jennifer Connelly

The power of love vs. the love of power. -A tagline for the film

This neo noir is set in the 1950s; the LAPD cops we meet are part of the anti-organized crime squad (“the Hat Squad”). These men are big/tough and do NOT hesitate to break the law, IF it suits their purposes; the drive around in a black convertible (1949 Buick Roadmaster). The leader of this unit is Det. Max Hoover (Nick Nolte); he and his wife, Katherine (Melanie Griffith), seem to have a V happy marriage. A local young woman, Allison Pond (Jennifer Connelly), is brutally murdered and dumped at building site; the investigation reveals she’d been romantically linked to several prominent men. One of her lovers was Gen. Thomas Timms (John Malkovich), the head of the Atomic Energy Commission; he is shown w/ her on a film. Hoover gets a shock when he sees Allison’s body; he knew her as well!

It kind of shocked everyone who knows me that I wound up doing this movie, because I had always been so careful about nudity; it was very much a part of this character and I couldn’t be coy or guarded or self-conscious, otherwise it wouldn’t work. It was sort of a challenge I wanted to take on, I guess. -Jennifer Connelly on her nude scenes

There are SO many familiar (some who became famous) faces here in cameos or supporting roles: Rob Lowe, Louise Fletcher, William Petersen (before his CSI days), Andrew McCarthy (as Allison’s gay bestie), Treat Williams (who passed away last wk.), Kyle Chandler, Michael Madsen, Daniel Baldwin (older bro of Alec), and Chazz Palminteri (as a somewhat sensitive cop). All of Connelly’s scenes are shown in flashbacks. This was the 1st American film directed by a New Zealander (Lee Tamahori); his mother is British and his father is Maori. He gained the attn. of Hollywood after getting critical acclaim for the indie drama Once Were Warriors (1994); I need to check that out soon. The DP is Haskell Wexler; he is considered one of the best in the field of cinematography.

Gen. Timms: These tiny particles of matter, which are so small that no one’s ever seen them – never – they contain enough energy to blow up this house, an entire city, every person on Earth. Now that is inconceivable.

Hoover: General, I really don’t think much about those things. I’d probably see too much.

Gen. Timms: What do you see?

Hoover: People dead before their time.

Gen. Timms: That’s the history of the world, Lieutenant. Some people die before their time so that others can live. It’s the cornerstone of civilization. War, religion, democracy. A hundred die so that a thousand may live.

This was a time of great change is the U.S. We see the suburbs being built; some cops are skeptical about these planned developments (long drive from the city). Max’s partner, Elleroy (Palminteri), has been seeing a (female) therapist. Unlike Max (who keeps things bottled up), Elleroy is able to talk about his (conflicting) feelings on the job. Malkovich gets some of the best lines; he plays a cold/smart/privileged man who thinks he’s above the law. The costumes, sets, and atmosphere reminded me V strongly of the older noirs. As one astute viewer wrote: “It isn’t your traditional cop drama/political thriller because of the nature of the main characters. They don’t always play by the rules, but in the end, they are the good guys. And, it’s got a good finale.”

Three Controversial Films Directed by Paul Verhoeven

Basic Instinct (1991) starring Michael Douglas & Sharon Stone

A violent police detective investigates a brutal murder that might involve a manipulative and seductive novelist. -Synopsis

We ALL know the story here, BUT is it a good movie (IF we put aside the explicit scenes)? I’d say it kept my interest and is (mostly) watch-able. It could’ve been shorter; the run time is 2 hrs. 8 mins. On a recent rewatch, I really noticed (and liked) the music; it was composed by Jerry Goldsmith) and V effective in creating tension/setting moods. I enjoyed the natural scenery: the winding roads around San Fran, the ocean, and Catherine’s beach house (recently priced at $52M). Catherine (Stone- 34 y.o.) wears some great (timeless) outfits; the actress sinks her teeth into the role (and becomes a star). She wasn’t well known; Douglas (48 y.o.) was the bigger name then. You will find homages to Hitchcock’s Vertigo. The 1st 45 mins of the story is much stronger than the rest. I can’t believe that the screenplay (by Joe Eszterhas) sold for $3M – wow!

The acting is NOT natural, as many viewers noted; it’s often V melodramatic. There are V problematic elements, which viewers may NOT have noticed back in the early ’90s. Beth, the police psychologist (played by Jeanne Tripplehorn- her 1st role), is treated V roughly/badly by Nick (Douglas) and just a plot device. I learned that members of the LGBTQ community protested screenings in ’91; it turns out that the 3 main women (bisexual) are characterized as potentially homicidal! In her recent autobiography, Stone wrote that Verhoeven (who hails from the Netherands and doesn’t shy away from controversy) “tricked” her into baring herself (in the infamous interrogation scene); he said that “the white underwear was causing a glare on camera.” I can see why many people now avoid this movie. As Siskel and Ebert said: “it’s NOT really about anything, if you take away the sex and nudity.”

Showgirls (1995) starring Elizabeth Berkley, Kyle MacLachlan, & Gina Gershon

Carefree young drifter Nomi arrives in Las Vegas, Nevada to become a dancer and sets about clawing her way to the top of the Vegas showgirls. -Synopsis

Whoever called this movie “All About Eve, the trashy version” summed up the plot perfectly- LOL! This is a (notorious) movie which some call “so bad that it’s good.” Nope, this is a hot mess akin to a trainwreck (or under-baked cake). I saw it for the 1st time last week; I was surprised by how bad it was! To modern eyes, the nudity, steamy scenes, and baddie (unlikeable) characters won’t be anything TOO shocking. Eszterhas also wrote this screenplay; it’s NOT only bad writing, BUT often the story doesn’t make sense!

Nomi (Berkley- a former teen star from Saved by the Bell) is woman in her early 20s who’s hitchhiking to Vegas; she has dreams of becoming a showgirl. She is robbed by the young man who gave her a ride; in a parking lot, she (luckily) meets a young Black woman, Molly (Gina Rivera), who gets her food and offers her a place to live. Then we shift forward 6 wks; Molly is doing a fashion degree while working on costumes (BTS of a big show). Nomi is working at a popular strip club, yet NOT happy about it. Molly takes Nomi along one night to her job; Nomi is SO taken w/ the performance (and can’t wait for her chance). Soon, she gets an audition, and the story gets going.

Verhoeven makes some (weird) directorial choices and they don’t pay off. The tone is some scenes doesn’t fit the story; it’s quite jarring. Berkley’s overacting (“continuous thrashing”- as one of the hosts of The Bechdel Cast pod said) is V annoying! There is V little that can be called “hot” or “steamy” in this movie (esp. to modern eyes), though there is a LOT of nudity! If you’re bothered by the skin-baring on shows like HBO’s GoT, then this will be TOO much for you. I think the only actor who is effective is Gershon, who plays Cristal (the est. star of the show). Zach (Kyle MacLachhlan w/ a V sleazy hairstyle) is involved w/ Cristal and promotes the show; he also becomes interested in Nomi. Perhaps the worst thing here is how terribly Molly is treated (in the last act); it’s V violent and unnecessary! Just don’t watch it- you can thank me now.

Elle (2016) starring Isabelle Huppert

A successful businesswoman gets caught up in a game of cat and mouse as she tracks down the unknown man who raped her. -Synopsis

Michèle (Huppert) is a mature/Parisian woman who co-owns a video game company, specializing in games filled w/ sex/violence. After being raped in her home, she (calmly) cleans up the mess and orders sushi. Now, this is NOT how we expect a victim to behave (in the movies)! We soon see that she is NOT easy to like, BUT compelling to watch! Michele (tough/independent/says what she wants) has been greatly affected by her father; she doesn’t trust the police. The film explores NOT only Michèle’s relationship w/ her rapist (whose identity is est. about 2/3 of the way), BUT also her circle of family/friends. There’s her best friend, ex-husband, a jobless son w/ a pregnant gf, and a troubled employee, etc.

I almost couldn’t believe that the same director who made Showgirls also made this movie! It is based on a book. Though it is well-made w/ subtle (and dark) humor, it could be V disturbing to many viewers. Why does Michele react in the ways she does!? It’s almost like she’s inviting danger into her life. Huppert is known (internationally) as a fine actress; she doesn’t express many emotions here, BUT makes a big impression. What works in one country/culture will NOT always be embraced (or even tolerated) in another one. I learned that Verhoeven wanted to make this in the US, BUT he couldn’t get any American actress to tackle the lead role.