Tag: Actors

“May December” (2023) starring Natalie Portman, Julianne Moore, & Charles Melton

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie May December (2023) streaming on Netflix.

Gracie: I thought you were taller. You look taller on television, but we’re basically the same size.

Elizabeth: We’re basically the same.

Natalie Portman (who plays an actress named Elizabeth) brought the script to director Todd Haynes as a potential collab; he loved the script and suggested Julianne Moore (w/ whom he worked on 4 other films) for Gracie. This film was acquired by Netflix for $11M following its premiere at Cannes (May 2023). It was shot in 23 days on location in Savannah, Georgia. Charles Melton (Riverdale) gained 40 lbs. for his role as Joe. Melton’s mother is an immigrant from Korea; she met her white/American husband while he was serving overseas in the military. A prolific character/NYC theater actor, D. W. Moffett (Gracie’s ex-husband Tom), heads the film and TV dept. at the Savannah College of Art and Design; students from the acting program appear in the movie.

Joe: [to his son] God, I can’t tell if we’re connecting, or if I’m creating a bad memory for you in real time, but I can’t help it.

Gracie and Joe met at the pet store where they worked when she was 36 y.o. and he was 13 y.o. As some of you MAY recall, the story IRL was even more problematic: Vili Fualaau was only 12 y.o. and Mary Kay Letorneau (39 y.o.) was his teacher. The 3 lead characters are a LOT more complicated than they initially appear. We start at a backyard BBQ of a (seemingly happy) family headed by Gracie Atherton-Yoo (a baker in her 50s) and her handsome/36 y.o. husband, Joe Yoo (a X-ray tech). They have 3 teen children together; one daughter is in college and the twins (a boy and girl) are preparing to graduate H.S. Through Elizabeth’s eyes, we gradually begin to learn more about this couple. It’s hard to understand why Gracie acts the way she does. Can she truly be as naive as she acts? Joe is still a boy in his mind, though w/ an adult’s body and responsibilities. His kids are half his age, BUT seem to be more mature.

You’re kinda dangerous in this movie. I never knew what she [Gracie] was gonna do. -Annette Bening commented to Moore during Variety’s Actors on Actors interview

This story NOT only delves into the predatory relationship btwn Gracie and Joe, it also comments on how (self-important) actors can predatorily insert themselves into strangers’ lives. For a woman who has transgressed in a big way, Gracie is V concerned w/ appearances and image (publicly). She has a V feminine (girly) persona; she speaks sometimes w/ a lisp (a decision Moore made to sound younger). Weirdly, as she gets to know Gracie more, Elizabeth copies the lisp. Melton walks as if he’s being dragged forward by an unseen force; he often has his shoulders hunched (to make himself smaller). Elizabeth flirts w/ Joe when they’re alone at the hospital during her observation of his work life.

There is an unsettling kind of tension that permeates this movie. Though I loved the acting (incl. from the kids), I was NOT a fan of the (cheesy) soundtrack. Haynes chose it from a ’70s drama he discovered. The (grainy/sun-drenched) visual style works here IMO, though it may be unappealing to some viewers. Is this supposed to be a comedy or a drama? As I was watching, I thought it had elements of a dark comedy. There are unexpected scenes, though I did guess what happened at the climax. Check it out for yourself!

[1] …this is a very well done movie about adults who are really just children. They never healed from their traumas and what ensues is a vision of how life is when you ignore that stuff. […]

The movie is for people that love film as art – not narrative. It is very well done. All the acting is based on nuanced subtext. The score and the cinematography are also very well done (I love slow zooms…sue me).

[2] Elizabeth is polite and apologetic as she initially treads carefully in asking probing questions of the family and their friends. Her approach generates some awkward moments, and although Gracie seems to hold firmly to her did-nothing-wrong stance, it’s Joe who begins to question things… mimicking the slow development of the Monarch butterflies he breeds.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Carmen” (2022) starring Melissa Barrera & Paul Mescal

EmmaLeave a comment


Love is a rebellious bird that nobody can tame… -A tagline for the movie

To escape a cartel, a young Mexican dancer, Carmen (Melissa Barrera), heads north to the US (California). Her route takes her through a desert guarded by the US Border Patrol, as well as a small group of (coded as fanatical) white men who seem to hunt ppl for sport. Mixed among these men is a newcomer/Army veteran, Aidan (Paul Mescal), desperate to earn money for the mortgage on his humble family home. Soon, the mismatched pair meet and start toward LA together. Carmen’s goal is to seek refuge in a club run by her deceased mom’s best friend, Masilda (Rossy de Palma).

This is the 1st film of choreographer/dancer Benjamin Millepied (ex-hubby of Natalie Portman); he and the actress met while working on Black Swan (2010). As some of you MAY know, they had a bad break-up (after he cheated w/ a younger woman). Jamie Dornan was originally going to play Aidan, BUT was replaced by Mescal (who is much younger). Barrera (who I’d never seen before) appeared in Lin Manuel Miranda’s movie musical In the Heights (2021). Recently, Barrera made comments on social media (re: Israel-Hamas); she was fired from the upcoming Scream movie. This movie was shot in Australia; Elsa Pataky (Chris Hemsworth’s wife) has a small role. I recall seeing her in the (short-lived) TV series Queen of Swords (2000-2001).

IF anyone asks for an example of an undercooked movie, then refer them to Carmen! The characters are V shallow (as in drawn w/ a broad brush); there is barely any plot. Perhaps worst of all, the dancing (NOT an expert here) looks basic/easy! I’m a fan of Mescal (who is Irish and just 27); here we see that he’s NOT yet 100% comfortable w/ an American accent. He does some dancing, which was pretty good (IMO). Hey, let’s give him a break here; youth is for trying new things, making mistakes, and growing! The filmmakers needed to realize that you can’t just rely on attractive actors/settings. As the Youngbloods say, this is “just vibes.” I’d suggest y’all check out Carmen Jones instead.

[1] I had high hopes for this feature. I’m a ballet and opera fan and am familiar with Benjamin Millepede. Unfortunately this was a sometimes excruciatingly slow movie to watch. There were some highly stylized scenes that were memorable… most of them were not. The scenes for the most part did not hang together to form a whole storyline.

[2] As it’s heralded as Carmen, and clearly veering towards Carmen Jones, I am utterly confused as to what this mess was. […]

I’m just so confused as to how this had none of the operatics. It was awful and yet I was SO excited to watch this. It was a mismatch of desultory exchanges and unexciting conversations.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Bigamist” (1953) starring Edmond O’Brien, Joan Fontaine, Ida Lupino, & Edmund Gwenn

EmmaLeave a comment

Wanted by two women! -A tagline for the film

Harry Graham (Edmond O’Brien) and his wife of 8 yrs, Eve (Joan Fontaine), are trying to adopt a baby; they have a successful/small business. The head of the adoption agency, Mr. Jordan (Edmund Gwenn), senses that Harry is hiding something, so does some investigating. There are several in-jokes about Santa Claus here; Gwenn played Kris Kringle in the holiday classic Miracle on 34th Street (1947). The agent soon discovers that Harry has done a LOT of traveling from his (luxury/condo) home in San Fran to L.A. Mr. Jordan goes to a lovely house in LA, where Harry has a 2nd wife- Phyllis Martin (Ida Lupino, also the director)- and (shocker) a baby! Desperate to explain himself, Harry reveals to Mr. Jordan (via flashbacks) how he ended up w/ 2 lives.

Writer/producer Collier Young was then the husband of Fontaine; he’d previously been married to Lupino. Wow, Hollywood is a small world! This is the ONLY time Lupino directed herself; she’s one of the 1st female stars to direct herself. Her best known film is the “The Hitchhiker”(1953) which also co-starred O’Brien. All of Lupino’s (small-budget/indie) films are marked by a concern for the lives of ordinary folks.

Harry Graham [re: meeting Phyllis]: For the first time, I felt needed; I loved Eve, but I never felt she needed me.

This is a small gem of a film that MAY surprise you; the issues delved into are modern. The acting from the 3 main actors is V good. Some reviewers commented that their sympathies were mostly w/ Eve; after she became “career-focused,” Harry felt like he was NOT needed. It turns out that Eve is a great assistant to her husband, so they BOTH benefit from the resulting success. Phyllis is a waitress who lives in a rented room; she’s NOT the type of woman who’d be “threatening” to most men. As this is in the public domain, so you can watch it for free.

[1] I found this to be an interesting film; it certainly wasn’t the sort of topic I expected to be explored in a film of this era… especially given its sympathetic portrayal of Harry. […] Edmond O’Brien does an impressive job as Harry and gets fine support from Joan Fontaine and Ida Lupino as Eve and Phyllis. Ida Lupino also does an impressive directing…

[2] The movie is shown through flashbacks. And, despite the sensational plot, the movie is actually done very sedately and avoids sensationalism. Instead, it tries to portray O’Brien in a pretty sympathetic light–while not excusing his actions. And, by doing so, the movie really gets you thinking. An excellent job of acting by all, but the star of this picture is Ida Lupino…

[3] Lupino and the script manage to provide an honest look at the situation with few hindrances from the strict production code of the era. Only at a couple of odd moments can you tell that they had to shift gears slightly, so as to placate the censors. Although the movie is low-key and straightforward, it’s a commendable effort, and it makes for good drama.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Unfaithfully Yours” (1948) starring Rex Harrison, Linda Darnell, Rudy Vallee, & Barbara Lawrence

Emma1 Comment

A Funloaded story against a Backdrop of Magnificent Music! -A tagline for the film

Barbara [to her husband, after seeing Sir Alfred being romantic]: You see, some men just naturally make you think of Brut champagne. With others you think of prune juice.
August, her husband: Oh, ho!
Barbara: You have nothing to laugh at!

While conducting a symphony orchestra, Sir Alfred De Carter (Rex Harrison), imagines 3 different ways of dealing w/ his wife Daphne’s (Linda Darnell) suspected infidelity. When he tries acting out his fantasies, things don’t go how he saw in his imagination! I rented this movie from Amazon Prime; it was also recently part of the Noir City DC Film Fest. Unfaithfully Yours was written/produced/directed by one of the early auteurs in Hollywood- Preston Sturges. As y’all cinephiles may know, Sturges also worked on w/ Remember the Night (1939), The Lady Eve (1941), and Sullivan’s Travels (1941) among other films. The music primarily used is from 3 composers: Rossini, Tchaikovsky, and Wagner.

Sir Alfred [to his wife, Daphne]: A thousand poets dreamed a thousand years, and you were born, my love.

The release of Unfaithfully Yours was delayed for several mos. b/c studio officials feared a backlash from the negative publicity surrounding the drug overdose/suicide of actress Carole Landis in July 1948. She was involved in an affair w/ Harrison; her body was found by him at her house. Although considered a classic today, the movie was a box office failure. The fantasy flashbacks were thought to be too experimental for its time and in poor taste. Fans of the (usually suave) Harrison objected to how he was portrayed here (doing pratfalls; behaving frenzied). The actor later called Sturges one of the V few men of genius he’d met in Hollywood.

Det. Sweeney [being a fanboy of Sir Alfred]: You handle Handel like nobody handles Handel. And your Delius – delirious!

[1] Preston Sturges, the creative mind behind this enjoyable film, was at the top of his profession. With this film, he solidified his position as one of the most innovative directors of that era in Hollywood. He wrote and directed with impeccable style that characterized most of the work he did for the cinema.

Rex Harrison gave an amazing performance as Alfred, the conductor whose jealousy gets the best of him. The last sequence at his apartment, after the concert is one of the best comic turns by this actor who goes through all the emotions, and furniture, in a frenzied manner.

[2] This movie is, at times, very black. It starts out pretty funny with Harrison spitting out his lines rapidly and his sense of comic timing was just perfect. When he has the fantasies though it turns dark and is pretty gruesome–especially for 1948. However, when he tries to carry them out and things go wrong, the film is uproarious.

[3] Rex Harrison comedy in films was mostly of the tongue and mind. He is known in most of his comedic roles for the witty quips, humorous repartee and funny dialogue. While there’s a smattering of that here, “Unfaithfully Yours” is mostly a departure from the normal Harrison persona. Here, he is very funny for his antics and the fumbling, bumbling and pratfalls. He reminds one instantly of the Three Stooges and the Marx Brothers.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Passages” (2023) starring Franz Rogowski, Ben Whishaw, & Adele Exarchopoulos

Emma2 Comments

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Passages (2023) streaming on MUBI.

…a form of cultural censorship that is quite dangerous, particularly in a culture which is already battling, in such extreme ways, the possibility of LGBT imagery to exist. -Ira Sachs (co-writer/director) on the NC-17 rating given to the film by the MPAA

At the wrap party for his latest movie, 30-something director, Tomas (Franz Rogowski- a German actor), celebrates w/ his hubby, Martin (Ben Whishaw- a British character actor), the film crew, and their guests. Among these guests is a 20-ish teacher, Agathe (Adèle Exarchopoulos- a Frenchwoman), who invites Tomas to dance. Soon, the two begin an affair, which puts strain on the relationship btwn Tomas, Martin, and their wider social circle.

I really liked how in this story the 3rd person is a woman. Because it shows how awkward it is to maybe try to have that balance of freedom and being open to people exploring, but also wanting traditional needs met. […]

He [Tomas] is not interested in making anyone else comfortable but himself.

-Excerpts from YouTube video by Jelly Fish Reviews (8/1/23)

This indie film was rejected by both Cannes and the Venice film fests; it had its world premiere at Sundance. Ira Sachs (who is American) and the film’s distributor, MUBI, rejected the NC-17 rating; it was released in theaters (unrated) in AUG 2023. I heard some positive things from media critics I follow, so had high hopes for this movie. I think many ppl are hungry for mature dramas w/ serious themes. This story has a V unusual/interesting premise, BUT there is little in the way of character development. Polyamory is NOT a topic we see discussed much in media.

The unlikeable protagonist (NOT a hero) doesn’t grow/learn/change by the end. FYI: Ragowski speaks w/ a lisp, which is his natural speaking manner (hard to understand at times IF you’re not using subtitles). Tomas is a narcissist who causes havoc w/ his words/actions wherever he goes. Some viewers commented that he isn’t “conventionally handsome”; Tomas has a patchy beard, gaunt features, dresses in mismatched clothing, and moves in a “snake-like manner.” We may wonder why Martin (a successful artist/business owner) and Agathe (an independent-minded/strong woman) found him SO appealing! After all, it’s easier for the audience to relate when a baddie IF he also happens to be a hottie (i.e. Brando in Streetcar; Newman in Hud).

The visual style of the film is NOT impressive; there are even scenes where the framing seems off and a character is hidden from view (while speaking). There are no camera “tricks,” which could’ve made this film a BIT more effective. The pacing is slow and I didn’t sense tension building as the story went on; there are common issue in (modern) movies. As for the “controversial” scenes, the sex looks “animalistic” (NOT romantic), as a few viewers commented. I saw little passion/connection btwn the characters.

[1] Not all films need to be message driven, but I think any director or writer makes a film because they have something to say. In that sense, I’m not sure what ‘Passages’ wanted to say.

[2] …a rather dull introspective of characters that didn’t really leap off the screen at me. […] The production and pacing all contribute to the general ennui of the whole thing and to be honest, I was just a bit disappointed with this whole thing.

[3] Without style, the absence of substance dominates this lackluster experience.

[4] The movie transcends type and finds the truth in its relationships, it dotes on and suffers with its protagonists in a manner that does feel intimate, both emotionally and physically.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews