Tag: Family

“The Delinquent Season” (2018) starring Cillian Murphy, Catherine Walker, Eve Birthistle, & Andrew Scott

Emma2 Comments

Love is a dangerous game. -Tagline

Two friend couples, Jim (Cillian Murphy) and his wife Danielle (Eve Birthistle), and Yvonne (Catherine Walker) and her husband Chris (Andrew Scott), have 2 children each, and appear to live in marital bliss, until cracks start to appear in both seemingly-steady marriages. The film asks “How well do any of us really know each other?” and explores the ideas of love, lust, and family relationships. -Synopsis

Have you seen the new movie Oppenheimer (starring Murphy) yet? (I’ll have a spoiler-free review up soon). Perhaps you’re a fan of Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s recent comedy series Fleabag (where Andrew Scott plays the “Hot Priest”). Or maybe you’re just looking for a smart/mature/modern drama (streaming for free on several platforms)? I came across this indie/Irish film (written/directed by Mark O’Rowe) while looking up Murphy’s work. It is mostly filmed like a play and centers on 4 characters; O’Rowe is known in Ireland for his work in the theater. Murphy (who was a musician before getting into acting) started out on the stage; he collaborated w/ O’Rowe in several plays. The more I see of his acting, the more I want to see!

Why can’t we (in U.S) make dramas like this!? I was pleasantly surprised by this film; I didn’t know what to expect beforehand. I thought it was quite true to life; the acting was terrific from all of the cast (incl. from the cute/tween kids). No one is depicted as a straight-up “villain” or a conventional “hero.” The characters look, dress, and speak like modern/middle-class folks w/ “everyday” problems (though the setting is suburban Ireland). This is the (perhaps rare) movie that doesn’t glamorize having an affair (unlike what is depicted in Adrian Lyne’s Unfaithful). The love scenes are shot in a matter-of-fact style, NOT to tittilate. I was reminded of David Lean’s Brief Encounter when it came to the tone (in certain scenes). The ending came as a BIT of a surprise to me (as it was un-Hollywood). Watch it for yourself- I don’t want to give away TOO many details!

Drama is conflict. I’m not interested in a good man’s life. I’m interested in contradiction, and pressure, and duress. All great works of art, or film or literature, in my opinion, have elements of those in them. Because who wants to write about happy people? -Cillian Murphy

[1] The film treats well the topic of middle-class malaise and ennui, deftly shifting the audience’s sympathy multiple times throughout.

[2] It was Cillian Murphy that attracted me to watch this movie. And I got so much more. Solid story with a presentation of moral dilemmas that have a lasting effect – both in thought and discussions

[3] At the end, I felt like I really knew these people, and I deeply felt for them. It’s such a small but perfect cast and such a tender and yet uncomfortable story.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Spoiler-Free Review: “Barbie” (2023) starring Margot Robbie & Ryan Gosling

Emma3 Comments

Barbie suffers a crisis that leads her to question her world and her existence. -Synopsis

She’s everything. He’s just Ken. -Tagline

Summer has (traditionally) been the season for family-friendly/crowd-pleasing movies. As you may know, both Barbie and Oppenheimer were released on the same day (July 21) of this yr. I went to see Barbie w/ a big group of (mostly) women during its 2nd wknd at AMC (Ballston Quarter). One of my friends was esp. excited; she purchased 10 tickets (limit per person) several wks. ahead of our screening. I was somewhat curious, b/c I really liked the work of director/co-writer Greta Gerwig (who turned 40 y.o. last wk) and Noah Baumbach (co-writer); they’re also partners IRL and have a baby together. Gerwig and Baumbach are also close friends/collaborators w/ Adam Driver. Some skeptical critics wondered: “Who is the audience for this movie?” As I expected, my theater was full w/ (mostly) women in their 20s-40s; many were wearing pink (in various shades).

The production design is V cool; you feel immersed in the material/colorful world of Mattell toys where “Stereotypical Barbie” (Robbie), her love interest, Ken (Gosling), and all their friends live. As we saw in the trailers/ads, there are Barbies and Kens of diverse backgrounds (Issa Rae, Simu Liu, Kingsley Ben-Adir, Kate McKinnon. etc.) Alan (Michael Cera), Midge, and a few other (NOT so well-known) dolls are also there. Women are the ones who hold ALL the important jobs in this (make-believe) world! Of course, there are several human characters (played by America Ferrera, Ariana Greenblatt, Will Ferrell, etc. ) A much younger Greenblatt (now 15 y.o.) was Driver’s co-star in the action movie 65 (2023). The eclectic music suits the story well; I was NOT familiar w/ all the songs. Yes, this movie has a feminist take (as I’m sure many are aware). It also includes singing and dancing (which reminded me of technicolor musicals). There are many LOL moments, yet there are emotional/touching ones also. I hadn’t seen much of Gosling’s acting; I was surprised by how funny he could be! I do think this movie was a BIT too long; this is a common problem today. There are also a few speeches; they are NOT all effective IMO. I think a wide audience (IF they keep an open mind) can enjoy this movie; it already passed the $1B mark worldwide – wow! Two of my (mid-20s; male and female) co-workers really liked the movie; they went on opening wknd.

Re-Watch: “Jagged Edge” (1985) starring Jeff Bridges, Glenn Close, Peter Coyote, & Robert Loggia

Emma1 Comment

When a murder case is this shocking, which do you trust… your emotions or the evidence? -Tagline

Jack: You still think I’m guilty? How can you defend me if you think I’m guilty?

Teddy: It happens all the time. It’s the way our legal system works.

San Fran publishing heiress, Page Forrester, is brutally murdered in her luxurious beach house. Her husband, Jack (Jeff Bridges), seems devastated by the crime; he is soon accused of her murder. He hires Teddy Barnes (Glenn Close) to defend him, despite the fact she hasn’t handled a criminal defense case in several years. There’s chemistry between them; the lawyer soon finds herself falling hard for her client.

The movie is about layers and layers and layers of truth. It’s like peeling an onion down to the core. Here we have a very intelligent, very attractive, very warm, very modern mother/career woman who has made a definite commitment to a moral standard, and makes one more moral stand when she says that she will only defend the man who is accused of a terrible crime, if she is convinced of his innocence. The rollercoaster begins. Is he innocent? Is he guilty? Is he lying? Or is he not? It’s a classic high-tension psychological thriller. -Richard Marquand, director (when asked re: the movie during promo)

This movie is the 1st of screenwriter Joe Eszterhas’ San Fran thriller trilogy; the later films are Basic Instinct (1992) and Jade (1995). Eszterhas originally titled the screenplay Hearts of Fire. Columbia disliked the title and decided it had to be changed; they assigned a secretary to go through the script. She came upon “jagged edge” (in description of the murder weapon: “a knife with a jagged edge”). Kevin Costner turned down the role of Jack (thank goodness)! Jane Fonda was originally attached to play Teddy. When she demanded that changes be made to the script, the studio sided w/ Eszterhas and replaced her w/ Close. Fonda and Bridges co-starred in another thriller- The Morning After (1986)- directed by Sydney Lumet.

Who did it? Tom Krasny, the district attorney with political aspirations, is quick to make a case against Forrester. But there is reason to believe that Krasny is as eager to ride this case into a senate seat as he is to convict the right man. Teddy is sharp. She launches her own investigation with the help of a crusty gumshoe named Sam Ransom. She finds what she is looking for: the holes in Krasny’s case and the fact that Forrester is not the only suspect. But she also finds something she wasn’t looking for: emotional and romantic involvement with her client. -Martin Ransohoff, producer

Martin Ransohoff (who went on to produce the movie) took the story idea to Columbia president (Guy McElwaine) in 1983; McElwaine was interested in a courtroom piece (an intense story that’d raise some pressing Qs about the legal system). According to Eszterhas’ book Hollywood Animal, Ransohoff was against the casting of Glenn Close (saying she was “too ugly” for the part). Close heard about this; she said she didn’t want Ransohoff on set during her scenes. The director (Richard Marquand- best known for Star Wars: Episode VI – The Return of the Jedi) supported Close and sent Ransohoff away. The producer was so mad that he went to studio heads trying to get them both fired! The studio later denied this happened (of course). Teddy has 2 young kids (David and Jenny); in their bedroom is a poster of The Return of the Jedi.

This tension between Krasny and Forrester is intense. There is history between them. The courtroom begins to take on the feeling of the O.K. Corral. -Jeff Bridges, actor

This is one of the earliest movies of the erotic thriller genre (and it’s quite effective). Now, there are some problematic elements (esp. when viewed through modern eyes). The acting is quite strong; Robert Loggia received a Best Supporting Oscar nom! Loggia plays Sam Ransom (former investigator in the DA’s office/Teddy’s trusted friend) who curses, drinks (a LOT), and looks rumpled. Teddy and Sam still regret what occurred on one of their past cases. At first, you may wonder if the DA (Teddy’s former boss), Thomas Krasny (Peter Coyote), will be the lead; he’s the focus of the opening 10 mins. To lend to the authenticity, the exteriors of the courtroom were San Fran’s City Hall.

Teddy: Sam! He didn’t do it!

Sam: Yeah? Is that your head talking, or another part of your anatomy? [Teddy gives him a sour look]

Sam: Hey, ok, what the hell, f**k me! [runs for the door]

Today’s viewers may NOT 100% buy into Teddy getting into a relationship w/ Jack; this is crucial for the plot. Teddy is recently divorced; her (nice/bland) ex-hubby doesn’t get much screen time (though the kids want their parents together). She desperately wants to believe that this client is innocent, BUT there are doubts. Here we have the (common) trope of the professional woman who makes a mess of her personal life. She leads w/ her heart, NOT her head. It doesn’t seem like Jack would be ready for romance after the recent tragedy. Jack works his charm on Teddy (w/o her suspecting); he takes her horseback riding, they walk on the beach, and have wine w/ takeout. Jeans, cozy sweaters, business suits- y’all know Bridges looks FAB in all the outfits. Close and Bridges are V well-matched; they create good chemistry together. In the tense/revelatory courtroom scenes, they convey much w/o dialogue.

[1] Bridges and Close show why they’re among the greatest stars of their generation. I can pretty much guarantee that you won’t find this movie boring. 

[2] This courtroom thriller was one of the films that spawned a huge wave of copycats through the mid ’80’s and early ’90’s. […]

…the film works very well on a visceral level, providing twists and shocks along the way (including one startling break-in near the end which is jarring no matter how many times it is seen.) The film’s greatest strength is the acting, notably Close. […] She brings great conviction to her poorly conceived role. Bridges does well also as the perfectly moussed, tan dreamboat who might be a savage murderer. Loggia brings a welcome salty edge to the film with his foul-mouthed portrayal of Close’s investigator friend.

The discordant music by Barry is very unsettling and his use of low piano keys doubtlessly inspired Jerry Goldsmith for “Basic Instinct.” It’s the same type of sound. Folks expecting a watertight story will be disappointed. Those who just want to be entertained and spooked should love it.

[3] The ending was cause for much discussion back in the day, and viewing it now it still feels like a moment of cheek mixed in with some form of clarity, but rest assured it works well, as does, funnily enough, the whole film. No world beater here, but highly accomplished and worth the time of any thriller obsessed movie fan. 

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Kindness of Strangers” (2019) starring Zoe Kazan, Andrea Riseborough, Tahar Rahim, Caleb Landry Jones, Jay Baruchel, & Bill Nighy

Emma5 Comments

Clara (Zoe Kazan- an American) and her two young sons (Anthony and Jude) drive from their small town to NYC. Alice (Andrea Riseborough- a Brit) runs a forgiveness support group out of a church; Marc (Tahar Rahim- a Frenchman w/ Algerian heritage) and his lawyer/friend, John Peter (Jay Baruchel- a Canadian), are recent members. While searching for food at a Russian restaurant (The Winter Palace), Clara meets Marc, who has been given the chance to revitalize the eatery by the owner, Tim (Bill Nighy- a Brit/also served as a producer). After their car is towed away, Clara’s family meets Alice (an ER nurse), who gets them into a shelter. A young/jobless man, Jeff (Caleb Landy Jones- an American), comes upon this shelter and becomes a volunteer.

The title of this indie film (free on several streaming platforms) comes from the Tennessee Williams’s play A Streetcar Named Desire. Blanche Dubois declares “I have always depended on the kindness of strangers” at the finale. The play was adapted into a movie directed by Elia Kazan, the grandfather of Zoe. The writer/director of The Kindness of Strangers is a Danish woman, Lone Scherfig; she directed a (must-see) drama- An Education (2009)- starring Carey Mulligan and Peter Sarsgaard. One reviewer was reminded of Frank Capra (a 1st gen Italian-American); this filmmaker’s movies carried positive messages and focused on the shared humanity of Americans. This film (which premiered at the Berlin Film Festival) was shot in NYC, Canada (Ontario), and Denmark.

The Kindness of Strangers has an understated quality, though there are some serious issues explored, incl. domestic abuse, unemployment, homelessness, lack of family/community support, and loneliness. Though the speed of life in NYC is fast, the pacing here allows us to notice each character of the fine international/ensemble cast. Kazan (who may be more known for rom coms) does V well w/ drama here; your heart just goes out to her character! Rahim is NOT only handsome/graceful (perhaps b/c he’s French IRL), he has a quiet intensity onscreen (as his character is mostly reserved). I admired the look of the film; the cinematographer is Sebastian Blenkov. Have you noticed that romantic scenes (dir. by women) are usually quite effective/memorable? There is a kiss btwn Kazan and Rahim which is full of emotion and (heartfelt) desire.

[1] Brilliant story, brilliant acting, brilliant directing. […] From the very beginning, it captures you; quite sad at some points, but it just kept getting better.

[2] The success of the movie depends on how Zoe Kazan carries her part and she carries it well. Good movie for anyone who has an interest in human relations.

[3] Homelessness is one thematic layer to a story that investigates kindness as the social glue that matters most and is possibly also the most underrated of dispositions or inclinations, often being seen as weak or oversensitive. Personally, I found it a lovely film, quite moving in places with its acknowledgment that, without kindness and the generosity of strangers, society would fall apart.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Shockproof” (1949) starring Cornell Wilde & Patricia Knight

EmmaLeave a comment

A parole officer falls in love with his client, a beautiful blonde who served time for murder, and he’s determined to help her go straight despite her interfering criminal boyfriend. -Synopsis

After having served 5 years in prison for killing a man while defending her gambler bf, Harry (John Baragrey), Jenny Marsh (Patricia Knight) is set for parole. Her parole officer, Griff Marat (Cornel Wilde), is determined to make Jenny go straight. Griff gives Jenny a job in his own home, something against regulations; she is a companion to his blind/Italian/immigrant mother. At first, Jenny still has feelings for Harry, BUT as Griff shows her more compassion and care, she falls in love w/ him. Harry seems to encourage this, b/c he has plans to crush Griff’s dreams of running for political office. Wilde (NOT the most versatile actor, yet fit well here) and Knight (a former model; his wife IRL) divorced in 1951. They do have good onscreen chemistry, as some viewers have noted.

This film (which is available for free on YouTube) features the iconic Bradbury Building as the location of Griff’s office. A YT movie critic noted that Bunker Hill (a real LA neighborhood) is the place of the Marat house. The post WWII era brought back big fashion, incl. Dior’s sumptuous “New Look” of full skirted ladies’ garments (launched in 1947). Costumer Jean Louis used that trend to his advantage in the clothes he designed for this film. The reaction of the two boys to meeting a “bleached blonde” was fairly typical. Peroxide blonde hair was usually relegated to film stars, pin up girls, or the “fast” women. It was a difficult, often risky process to do; the mid-century would bring innovation in hairstyles (and hair coloring become easier/less costly to obtain). A popular ad line from Clairol asked: “Is it true blondes have more fun?”

Douglas Sirk (who is now considered a “director of women’s pictures”) signed on to make this film on the basis of Sam Fuller’s original screenplay, which was called The Lovers, and ended in a violent rebellion against the system keeping Griff and Jenny apart. Co-producer Helen Deutsch rewrote the script and added the (approved by Columbia) ending. Sirk hated the ending; he later said Deutsch’s changes ruined the film by removing the sense of doom in Fuller’s story. As noir-istas may know, Fuller worked as a writer and/or director on many films (incl. Pickup on South Street). Sirk went on to direct the Technicolor melodramas Magnificent Obsession (1954), All that Heaven Allows (1955), and Imitation of Life (1959). I want to see Written on the Wind (1956); I missed the recent screenings at AFI (here in Silver Spring).

[1] They say it’s the journey, not the destination, that usually counts with stories. In the case of Shockproof it’s good to just focus on the journey…

[2] …the main woman is a bit wooden. You can feel her trying too hard too often…

…there are some things to really enjoy here. You might find the movie ordinary for awhile, with some nice clichés and a steady development. But then, halfway, there’s a huge and really sudden twist. And a believable one, a great scene. Suddenly there is a whole new plot.

[3] Sirk and Lawton consistently have bar shadows featuring prominently; Jenny Marsh never escapes them… The Marat home is a delightful amalgamated design of art deco and the ornate.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews