“Sibyl” (2019) starring Virginie Efira, Adele Exarchopoulos, Gaspard Ulliel, & Sandra Huller

This French film (made for ONLY 5M euros) from Justine Triet (director/co-writer) and partner, Arthur Harari (co-writer/supporting actor), follows a 30-something psychotherapist, Sibyl (Virginie Efira). She is also wife to Etienne (Paul Hamy) and mom to 2 young kids. Sibyl decides to return to writing (her 1st career), yet still keeps a few patients. Harari plays Dr. Katz (Sibyl’s therapist), as is required in the mental health profession. One night, while dealing w/ writer’s block, Sibyl gets a (frantic) call from 20-ish/up-and-coming actress, Margot (Adèle Exarchopoulos). As Sibyl becomes more… and more wrapped up in Margot’s (turbulent) life, she starts to blur her past from the present… and reality from fiction!

I became curious re: this (genre-defying) film b/c it involved Triet, Harari, and Huller; it was made before they achieved international fame/critical acclaim w/ Anatomy of a Fall (2023). This is the last film released during his lifetime for Gaspard Ulliel (who plays Igor); he died in a ski accident in 2022 at just age 38. I hadn’t seen Efira’s acting before; she hails from Belgian. Efira and Niels Schneider (who plays Gabriel) are a couple IRL w/ one child. Exarchopoulos (then only 26 y.o.) has a French mother and Greek father; she co-starred in several well-known indies. The movie w/in the movie (starring Margot and Igor) was shot on the island of Stromboli (a part of Sicily, Italy).

From the trailer, I was expecting the tone of a dark/thriller; however, there are funny moments! This is free on streaming, so check it out (if in the mood for something unusual). Some viewers wondered: “Who is the patient and who is the therapist?” Gathering from reviews (IMDb; Letterboxd)- ppl are conflicted re: on this movie. Some called it a “hot mess” w/ “hot people”- LOL! Some expected more, yet did enjoy Huller’s performance as a perfectionist/Type A director. As in Anatomy of a Fall, Huller speaks more in English than in French. How cool is it that she can act in 3 languages!?

[1] You have to suspend your disbelief quite a lot and go with the flow. Having a love for making movies and understanding what can go on behind the scenes (it almost feels like someone is doing their own curing by doing the movie – the writer, the director, producers … all of the above and more?)

[2] I can’t recall seeing a film with so many good and great elements: cinematography, acting, a good deal of great dialogue, that was assembled into such a let down of total experience.

[3] The most enjoyable scenes for me were those with Sandra Huller, playing a film director, especially her reactions to the difficulties the actors are creating on her set. Her sensible response to the psychotherapist’s behaviour is long awaited and ultimately very satisfying.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Riot Club” (2014) starring Sam Claflin, Max Irons, & Douglas Booth

Filthy. Rich. Spoilt. Rotten. -A tagline for the film

The Bullingdon Club (founded in 1780) was notorious for booking a restaurant, trashing it, then handing the owner a check for damages on the way out. The unofficial club (which still exists today) consists of a group of male elites at Oxford. This film is based on the play Posh (by Lauren Wade); it premiered at the Royal Court Theatre (2010), before transferring to the West End. The Danish director, Lone Scherfig, was at the helm of An Education (2009) and The Kindness of Strangers (2019). Alistair (Sam Claflin) and Miles (Max Irons: son of Jeremy Irons and Sinead Cusack), both come from the British aristocracy. They start their 1st (freshman) year at Oxford. Miles appears relaxed w/ a down-to-earth personality; he starts dating a (middle-class) student, Lauren (Holliday Grainger). Alistair is uptight and wants to emulate his uncle (played by Tom Hollander)- a Tory Minister of Parliament (MP). These two young men end up being tutor partners and pledge to join the Riot Club.

This title came up as I was looking up films of Josh O’Connor; he plays Ed- goofy, naive, yet snobby. George (Jack Farthing- in his 1st movie) is quiet, wide-eyed, and eager to please. The president of the club is James (Freddie Fox: recently on S2 of House of the Dragon); the cast referred to him as “the most posh one” (in press interviews). Fox is the son of 2 veteran British character actors- Edward Fox and Joanna David. Harry (Douglas Booth) has a model-like face and eye for women; his family has a country estate (recently opened for tours). Hugo (Sam Reid- currently on Interview with the Vampire) is confident, titled, yet cash poor. Each of the young actors gets their moment to shine; all give believable performances.

This film could’ve been titled Toxic Masculinity: UK College Edition; it delves into issues which are timely and timeless. What happens when (rich/white) males grow-up w/ (unchecked) privilege? When any problem comes up, their 1st solution is to throw money at it! Women are seen as conquests, NOT friends or potential love interests. Isn’t the time of these type of clubs over? some may ask. Well, there are college boys who die still in hazing rituals at fraternities! College (late teens-early 20s) is time when we become adults (under the law), yet are still forming our identities (and susceptible to peer pressure). This story will take you on an emotional journey. At first, there are a LOT of laughs from witty one-liners; these kids are smart after all. Then, it becomes darker w/ some shocking scenes (which will make you tense/uncomfortable).

[1] As most will know, The Riot Club is inspired by the Bullingdon Club, an Oxford University dining society infamous for its destructive hedonism that boasts alumni such as David Cameron, Boris Johnson and George Osborne. The film’s main target of attack isn’t the purported anti-social behaviour of such people, the obnoxious decadence we witness is not endemic to the highly disagreeable “Riot Club,” what it attacks is rather the characters’ raging, blue-blooded superiority complexes that causes it.

[2] My only complaint about the movie would be the main character (Miles Richards) being a flawless Mary Sue – rich, handsome, witty, intelligent, kind and well meaning, as well as some of the other positive characters being presented as these morally superior beings. That felt very strange for a movie, the main idea of which is that not everything is as black and white as it seems, and we all just try to justify our own actions while doing what we feel (not think) is best.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Until They Sail” (1957) starring Jean Simmons, Joan Fontaine, Paul Newman, & Piper Laurie

The genuine tugs at the heart are few and far between in this bittersweet but basically restrained chronicle. Robert Anderson’s adaptation… is honest and straightforward… Unfortunately there is a good deal of introspective soul-searching before this narrative arrives at its sad and happy endings. -Bosley Crowther (New York Times)

The film opens in a Christchurch, New Zealand courtroom, where testimony prompts Barbara Leslie (Jean Simmons) to flashback to the events that led to the trial. In 1939, Barbara and her sisters: Anne (Joan Fontaine), Delia (Piper Laurie), and Evelyn (Sandra Dee- just 14) live in a cottage in Christchurch. Most of the men, incl. their brother Kit and Barbara’s new husband Mark, are preparing to leave for WWII. Some time later, Delia announces her engagement to Phil “Shiner” Friskett (Wally Cassell); he is one of the city’s few remaining bachelors, though word of Kit’s death dampens the mood. Anne disapproves of the marriage, but Barbara defends Delia’s decision. Shiner is eventually drafted for war; Delia moves to Wellington to work for the navy. In 1942, several hundred U.S. Marines are shipped to New Zealand.

The film has moments of genuine tenderness and truth. -William K. Zinsser (New York Herald Tribune)

The screenplay was by Robert Anderson, based on a story by James A. Michener included in his 1951 anthology Return to Paradise. As fans of classics know, there are limits (and conventions) to the Hollywood studio system. The 1st thing you’ll need to ignore are the (wildly varied) accents of the sisters; we learn that Anne and Barbara attended school in England. The hairstyles and clothing worn by the women reflect the mid-1950s, NOT the early ’40s. There are a few scenes that come off as TOO melodramatic; others can drag on a BIT too long. However, the look of the film is lovely; it was shot in Cinemascope (or extra widescreen). The musical score by David Raksin suits the events V well.

This [pulls out a bottle of whiskey from glove compartment] is what I spend the night with… and no regrets. Oh, I get a gentlemanly hangover in the morning, but no regrets. And nobody gets hurt. -Jack explains to Barbara

U.S. servicemen married over 15,000 Australian and New Zealanders they met while stationed overseas in WWII. The War Brides Act of December 1945 required only proof of marriage to ensure legal migration to the US. Some modern sources est. the total war bride migration was one of the largest migrations to the country since the 1920s. Paul Newman (before fame; 3rd billed) accepted a supporting role only b/c Robert Wise was directing. I heard about this movie (via a Facebook post); I’d recommend it esp. to fans of Newman and Simmons. You can rent it on VOD; I saw it last week.

Newman plays Capt. Jack Harding, an alcohol-dependent/cynical/divorced Marine investigating prospective brides of soldiers. From the choices that Newman makes, you can see that acting is becoming more subtle in this time. As Barbara, Simmons is caring and empathetic to her sisters; she’s trying to live a “decent” life. One astute viewer noted that modern viewers (who’ve recently lived through the COVID-19 pandemic) may esp. relate to the loneliness experienced by the sisters in this movie. As Barbara tells Jack when they reconnect, her countrymen have been gone 3 yrs so far (1939-1942). I esp. liked how their connection grew (so it seems gradual/natural- NOT rushed); Newman and Simmons project intense chemistry!

[1] Not the best role of any of the principal actors’ careers, but definitely worth seeing, especially if you are drawn to WWII era dramas.

[2] Jean Simmons… is the counterpart for Paul Newman, who is the point man for the American presence (and the introduction to American men). […]

…even if this movie seems to follow some ordinary romantic path, you can’t help but feel, individually, for the four women wanting to not be alone. (It has some echo of “Little Women,” to me.) That’s the reason to hang in there. It takes time to get invested in the characters and their needs. Paul Newman is very good as usual, but more restrained than you might expect. Handsome, but without some kind of edge that made him bigger than life.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

#Oscars Best Picture Nominee: “Anora” (2024) starring Mikey Madison

Love is a hustle. -A tagline for the film

This is yet (another) movie that shows us the hard truth- ain’t NO man coming to save you! This is my 1st time watching a Sean Baker movie; he’s the writer, director, and editor of this (unusual) indie film. This film won the Palm d’Or at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival. The title character (who prefers to be called “Ani”) is played by Mikey Madison; I saw this actress in her supporting role in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (2019). Ani is a 23 y.o. stripper (or sex worker) at a club in Manhattan; she’s a blend of sweet and tough (as several viewers noted). One night, the club’s manager pulls Ani aside to explain that a client wants to see someone who speaks Russian. Vanya (Mark Eydelshteyn) is a big spender/heavy drinker, though just 21 y.o. Since Ani’s grandma never learned English, they communicated in Russian. Ani quickly charms Vanya; soon, he invites her to his mansion. They seem to like each other, have some laughs, and end up in Vegas (w/ a group of his friends); of course, Anora is paid to act like a gf. Suddenly (after a week), Vanya proposes to Ani, and she says “yes!” Are they really in love? Is this a reckless decision they’ll come to regret?

Some viewers have compared this movie to Pretty Woman, BUT w/ a more gritty, dark, and realistic bent. The nudity (and intimate scenes) are also unlike ones you’d see in typical rom coms. This film takes an (unflinching) look at the issue of class; this is NOT often done in America. Honestly, I didn’t think much re: class/social differences until I lived in NYC myself. In once scene, Vanya (unlike Anora) doesn’t move his feet while his young maid (a Russian immigrant) is vacuuming; he continues to play video games. It turns out that Vanya is still an immature boy; his lifestyle is paid for by his wealthy/business-oriented parents (who live in Russia).

The 1st act has been described as a (high energy) rom com; the rest is slower w/ the tone of a dark comedy. It was refreshing to see areas of NYC that aren’t often in movies; Ani lives in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn (known for its large Russian population). We see Coney Island (nearly empty in Winter) and points of interest in Vegas (such as an iconic wedding chapel). Though Ani is the central (POV) character, the supporting characters (who work for Vanya’s parents) add flavor to the story. Toros (Karren Karagulian) is the priest who baptized Vanya; he’s one of the men responsible for watching out for Vanya. Igor (Yura Borisov) is a quiet/stoic young man who works as an enforcer. One astute movie critic noted that both Ani and Igor use their bodies in their work. What did you think of that (unexpected) last scene of the movie? I found myself getting a BIT emotional.

[1] Anora is a punch to the face of the traditional fairytale concept. It’s a realistic, violent, raw, funny, and ultimately sweet modern Cinderella story.

[2] Some films are completely made by their last scenes, and Anora is one of them. […]

…in the film’s final moments, we see all of that bravura fall away and Anora turn into a sobbing little girl when a character offers her a taste of genuine human kindness and affection.

[3] Once the first act concludes and the second act kicks in, there’s a striking shift in both tone and style that I honestly did not see coming.

The comedy is genuinely entertaining, with moments that will have you laughing out loud. Despite serious circumstances, the absurdity of the situations elicits laughter and chuckles.

[4] The storyline was predictable and uninspired, failing to hold my attention or evoke any emotional response. The characters lacked depth, making it impossible to connect with them or care about their journey.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Juror #2” (2024) starring Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, J.K. Simmons, Kiefer Sutherland, & Zoey Deutch

While serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, a family man finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma, one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict or free the wrong killer. -Synopsis

In Savannah, GA, Justin Kemp (British up-and-coming actor Nicholas Hoult) is a writer at a lifestyle mag who is called in for jury duty. He tries to get out of it, explaining to the judge (Amy Aquino) that his wife- Allison (Zoey Deutch)- is in the 3rd trimester of her pregnancy. The judge isn’t moved, noting that this won’t take more time than his (9-5) job. The case is the murder of a young woman, Kendall Carter (Francesca Eastwood); the defendant is her on-again/off again bf- James Sythe (Gabriel Basso). The prosecutor, Faith Killebrew (Toni Colette), is running to be DA; she’s V confident that this will be an open and shut case. She has a (friendly) rivalry w/ the defense attorney, Eric Resnick (Chris Messina). In flashbacks, we see that Justin- on the (stormy) night that Kendall died- hit something w/ his car!

Are y’all feeling nostalgic for those 1990s (EX: John Grisham) legal dramas? Then, this is (new-ish) movie (from Clint Eastwood- still working) is for you. I have to admit, the premise looked interesting, so I checked it out over the recent holiday break (on HBO MAX). Also, many critics/viewers have commented that (mid-budget) dramas like this for a grown-up audience are lacking from theaters in recent yrs. Don’t look for any big thrills or even much tension. This is a case of missed opportunities (directing choices) and lackluster dialogue (basic screenwriting). Even the musical score is nothing memorable.

This movie is also a reunion btwn. Hoult and his (onscreen) About a Boy (2002) mom- Collette. The actors are doing the best they can w/ the material; however, Collette’s Southern accent is a BIT uneven. The jury is V diverse (reflecting a mid-sized city in the modern era), BUT there is V little character development. Small roles are played by Kiefer Sutherland and J. K. Simmons; I guess LOT of actors want to work w/ Eastwood. You may’ve heard that there is an unexpected ending, BUT that can’t save the film.

[1] For one, the case itself seemed pretty weak to begin with. It was mostly circumstantial and no direct evidence linking the defendant to the crime.

[2] This cast is doing their best, but the material is so incredibly dumb. The elevator pitch of the plot is intriguing, but it’s got the silly execution of a CBS crime procedural.

I watched it for the cast, and for the moral dilemma and mystery of the premise, but the trailer had more actual plot clarity than the movie itself.

[3] I was surprised how 2D some of the characters on the jury were, and pretty simplistic and dated stereotypes.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews