Tag: Friendship

Spoiler-Free Review: “Barbie” (2023) starring Margot Robbie & Ryan Gosling

Emma3 Comments

Barbie suffers a crisis that leads her to question her world and her existence. -Synopsis

She’s everything. He’s just Ken. -Tagline

Summer has (traditionally) been the season for family-friendly/crowd-pleasing movies. As you may know, both Barbie and Oppenheimer were released on the same day (July 21) of this yr. I went to see Barbie w/ a big group of (mostly) women during its 2nd wknd at AMC (Ballston Quarter). One of my friends was esp. excited; she purchased 10 tickets (limit per person) several wks. ahead of our screening. I was somewhat curious, b/c I really liked the work of director/co-writer Greta Gerwig (who turned 40 y.o. last wk) and Noah Baumbach (co-writer); they’re also partners IRL and have a baby together. Gerwig and Baumbach are also close friends/collaborators w/ Adam Driver. Some skeptical critics wondered: “Who is the audience for this movie?” As I expected, my theater was full w/ (mostly) women in their 20s-40s; many were wearing pink (in various shades).

The production design is V cool; you feel immersed in the material/colorful world of Mattell toys where “Stereotypical Barbie” (Robbie), her love interest, Ken (Gosling), and all their friends live. As we saw in the trailers/ads, there are Barbies and Kens of diverse backgrounds (Issa Rae, Simu Liu, Kingsley Ben-Adir, Kate McKinnon. etc.) Alan (Michael Cera), Midge, and a few other (NOT so well-known) dolls are also there. Women are the ones who hold ALL the important jobs in this (make-believe) world! Of course, there are several human characters (played by America Ferrera, Ariana Greenblatt, Will Ferrell, etc. ) A much younger Greenblatt (now 15 y.o.) was Driver’s co-star in the action movie 65 (2023). The eclectic music suits the story well; I was NOT familiar w/ all the songs. Yes, this movie has a feminist take (as I’m sure many are aware). It also includes singing and dancing (which reminded me of technicolor musicals). There are many LOL moments, yet there are emotional/touching ones also. I hadn’t seen much of Gosling’s acting; I was surprised by how funny he could be! I do think this movie was a BIT too long; this is a common problem today. There are also a few speeches; they are NOT all effective IMO. I think a wide audience (IF they keep an open mind) can enjoy this movie; it already passed the $1B mark worldwide – wow! Two of my (mid-20s; male and female) co-workers really liked the movie; they went on opening wknd.

“His Kind of Woman” (1951) starring Robert Mitchum, Jane Russell, Vincent Price, & Raymond Burr

Emma1 Comment

The hottest combination that ever hit the screen! -Louella D. Parsons

Nick Ferraro (Raymond Burr), a crime boss deported to Italy, needs to re-enter the US. His plan involves “honest” gambler, Dan Milner (Robert Mitchum), who’s subjected to a series of “misfortunes,” then bribed to take a trip to Mexico. On the way, Dan meets a lounge singer, Lenore Brent (Jane Russell), who calls herself one of the “idle rich.” Upon arrival at the resort (Morros Lodge) in Baja, Dan finds the guests all playing roles, except- maybe- actor Mark Cardigan (Vincent Price). What does Ferraro want w/ him? Can he trust anyone?

Myron Winton, an American banker: [after he & other guests have viewed Mark’s latest films] Yes sir, I agree with those folks: that was one of the finest movies I’ve ever seen. They oughta’ make ’em ALL like that. None of this nonsense about social matters. People don’t go to the movies to see how miserable the world is – they go there to eat popcorn and be happy!

Mark: [Addressing Mr. Krafft] What did you think of it?

Mr. Krafft, an European writer: [Dourly] It had a message no pigeon would carry.

Mark: [Slightly amused, turning to Myron] At my studios, all messages are handled by Western Union.

Myron: You know, you can’t take his opinion on anything: he’s an intellectual.

[Mark responds with a look of mild alarm.]

There is much drama BTS of this film noir, which pokes fun at the genre. John Farrow finished the film, BUT Howard Hughes (a well-known control freak) brought in Richard Fleischer to add a few shots. Hughes co-wrote the ending w/ Fleischer, who ended up reshooting the entire movie. Lee Van Cleef was cast as the crime kingpin before Hughes suddenly decided he wanted Burr instead. All of Ferraro’s scenes had to be reshot w/ Burr. During his RKO days, Mitchum referred to himself as “a tall dog on a short leash.” In his memoirs, Fleischer wrote that the actor’s alcoholism caused a LOT of problems for the production. One day, Fleischer told the actor that he “was making a fool of himself.” Mitchum then pushed the stuntmen off and destroyed the set! The next morning, a sober Mitchum was V remorseful and apologized to the director for his behavior.

Mark: [Preparing to go out and rescue Dan] Now might I drink hot blood and do such bitter business the earth would quake to look upon.

Helen, his estranged wife: [Rolling eyes] Hamlet again…

Gerald, his manager: Mark, this is no time for histrionics.

Mark: [Scoffing] What fools ye mortals be.

This movie is rather long for its day; the running time is 2 hrs. There are scenes which could’ve been edited better. Mitchum and Russell do look hot together (as the ads claimed); they’re both tall, laconic, and project ease/confidence. They went on to become V good friends IRL. Russell was “discovered” by Hughes. I’d read (on a film noir Facebook group) comments re: how funny Price was here. There are several LOL moments, which is NOT common for noirs! Some careful viewers noticed that Price is often slumping, wearing oversized costumes, and has makeup (which makes his face look rounder). This was (obviously) done to make him appear less imposing/attractive than Mitchum (the hero).

[1] Price quotes Shakespeare, critiques his performance, and is amazed by his own heroics, and he has never been funnier, onscreen.

[2] In a way, the film can be seen as three films in one. The opening scenes are shot in the dark, menacing film noir style. […] When Milner arrives in the resort the mood becomes lighter, and the film resembles more one of those “sophisticated” comedies about divorce and adultery… When the villains arrive and the nature of their plans becomes clear, the mood of the film changes again.

[3] …a great example of a film where the dialog is so snappy that the plot itself is secondary. Now this does NOT mean the plot is bad- the film is very well-written, as the WHAT and WHY turn out to be pretty interesting. But when Mitchum talks, he is the ultimate in ’50s cool- with a wonderful world-weary style and sarcasm... In addition, his scenes with Russell are great- with a nice mixture of romance, sarcasm and heat!

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Black Widow” (1954) starring Ginger Rogers, Van Heflin, Gene Tierney, & George Raft

Emma1 Comment

At a cocktail party thrown by nabes, a married Broadway writer/producer, Peter Denver (Van Heflin), meets a 20 y.o. young woman, Nancy “Nanny” Ordway (Peggy Ann Gardiner), an aspiring writer. He tells his actress/wife, Iris (Gene Tierney- in a small role), about this new acquaintance; she’s out of town helping her ailing mom. Peter decides to take her under his wing, giving her advice, and a bright place to write (his apt). A few weeks later, Nanny is found dead in his apt! At first thought to be a suicide, it is later discovered that she was murdered; suspicion falls on Peter. He begins his own investigation in order to clear his name; he discovers that Nanny wasn’t as naive/innocent as she appeared to be. The lead cop on the case, Lt. Bruce, is played by George Raft (in his gray-haired/character actor era). Classic film fans may know him from his leading roles (’30s-’40s).

Peter’s nabe/friend, Brian Mullen (Reginald Gardiner), started an affair w/ Nanny (who became pregnant) b/c she made him feel appreciated. This happened weeks before she met Peter. Brian (who has no current job) is married to a successful/glam Bdwy actress, Carlotta “Lottie” Marin (Ginger Rogers). From the early scenes, we see that Lottie is “the one that wears the pants” (and has a strong personality). Rogers uses a haughty/theatrical voice in her role; she wears several stylish outfits. Though Brian acts humble/self-deprecating in public re: being “a nobody,” Nanny realizes that it bothers him to be perceived of as less than his wife.

This is a movie that made me wonder: Are men doing OK? It seems that (even today), some men have a prob when gfs/wives make more money and/or have more power/influence than themselves. Actress Keke Palmer’s bf (w/ whom she had a baby recently) called her out (on Twitter) re: her outfit at an Usher concert. I don’t know what (IF anything) he does for a living; I’m guessing that Palmer is the breadwinner. Sarah Brady, a pro surfer/ex-gf of Jonah Hill, released texts (on IG) where the actor was trying to counsel her re: clothing and friendships when they were a couple. Were these actions (taken by Palmer’s bf and Hill’s ex) on social media in good taste? No, BUT they do reveal the insecurity some men feel when they can’t control the women in their lives. So why NOT pursue women who have more “regular” jobs or those who choose to dress “conservative?” Well, that wouldn’t be a challenge to men w/ this mindset! They want to tear down women that society puts above them (when it comes to money, status, looks, etc.)

Re-Watch: “Jagged Edge” (1985) starring Jeff Bridges, Glenn Close, Peter Coyote, & Robert Loggia

Emma1 Comment

When a murder case is this shocking, which do you trust… your emotions or the evidence? -Tagline

Jack: You still think I’m guilty? How can you defend me if you think I’m guilty?

Teddy: It happens all the time. It’s the way our legal system works.

San Fran publishing heiress, Page Forrester, is brutally murdered in her luxurious beach house. Her husband, Jack (Jeff Bridges), seems devastated by the crime; he is soon accused of her murder. He hires Teddy Barnes (Glenn Close) to defend him, despite the fact she hasn’t handled a criminal defense case in several years. There’s chemistry between them; the lawyer soon finds herself falling hard for her client.

The movie is about layers and layers and layers of truth. It’s like peeling an onion down to the core. Here we have a very intelligent, very attractive, very warm, very modern mother/career woman who has made a definite commitment to a moral standard, and makes one more moral stand when she says that she will only defend the man who is accused of a terrible crime, if she is convinced of his innocence. The rollercoaster begins. Is he innocent? Is he guilty? Is he lying? Or is he not? It’s a classic high-tension psychological thriller. -Richard Marquand, director (when asked re: the movie during promo)

This movie is the 1st of screenwriter Joe Eszterhas’ San Fran thriller trilogy; the later films are Basic Instinct (1992) and Jade (1995). Eszterhas originally titled the screenplay Hearts of Fire. Columbia disliked the title and decided it had to be changed; they assigned a secretary to go through the script. She came upon “jagged edge” (in description of the murder weapon: “a knife with a jagged edge”). Kevin Costner turned down the role of Jack (thank goodness)! Jane Fonda was originally attached to play Teddy. When she demanded that changes be made to the script, the studio sided w/ Eszterhas and replaced her w/ Close. Fonda and Bridges co-starred in another thriller- The Morning After (1986)- directed by Sydney Lumet.

Who did it? Tom Krasny, the district attorney with political aspirations, is quick to make a case against Forrester. But there is reason to believe that Krasny is as eager to ride this case into a senate seat as he is to convict the right man. Teddy is sharp. She launches her own investigation with the help of a crusty gumshoe named Sam Ransom. She finds what she is looking for: the holes in Krasny’s case and the fact that Forrester is not the only suspect. But she also finds something she wasn’t looking for: emotional and romantic involvement with her client. -Martin Ransohoff, producer

Martin Ransohoff (who went on to produce the movie) took the story idea to Columbia president (Guy McElwaine) in 1983; McElwaine was interested in a courtroom piece (an intense story that’d raise some pressing Qs about the legal system). According to Eszterhas’ book Hollywood Animal, Ransohoff was against the casting of Glenn Close (saying she was “too ugly” for the part). Close heard about this; she said she didn’t want Ransohoff on set during her scenes. The director (Richard Marquand- best known for Star Wars: Episode VI – The Return of the Jedi) supported Close and sent Ransohoff away. The producer was so mad that he went to studio heads trying to get them both fired! The studio later denied this happened (of course). Teddy has 2 young kids (David and Jenny); in their bedroom is a poster of The Return of the Jedi.

This tension between Krasny and Forrester is intense. There is history between them. The courtroom begins to take on the feeling of the O.K. Corral. -Jeff Bridges, actor

This is one of the earliest movies of the erotic thriller genre (and it’s quite effective). Now, there are some problematic elements (esp. when viewed through modern eyes). The acting is quite strong; Robert Loggia received a Best Supporting Oscar nom! Loggia plays Sam Ransom (former investigator in the DA’s office/Teddy’s trusted friend) who curses, drinks (a LOT), and looks rumpled. Teddy and Sam still regret what occurred on one of their past cases. At first, you may wonder if the DA (Teddy’s former boss), Thomas Krasny (Peter Coyote), will be the lead; he’s the focus of the opening 10 mins. To lend to the authenticity, the exteriors of the courtroom were San Fran’s City Hall.

Teddy: Sam! He didn’t do it!

Sam: Yeah? Is that your head talking, or another part of your anatomy? [Teddy gives him a sour look]

Sam: Hey, ok, what the hell, f**k me! [runs for the door]

Today’s viewers may NOT 100% buy into Teddy getting into a relationship w/ Jack; this is crucial for the plot. Teddy is recently divorced; her (nice/bland) ex-hubby doesn’t get much screen time (though the kids want their parents together). She desperately wants to believe that this client is innocent, BUT there are doubts. Here we have the (common) trope of the professional woman who makes a mess of her personal life. She leads w/ her heart, NOT her head. It doesn’t seem like Jack would be ready for romance after the recent tragedy. Jack works his charm on Teddy (w/o her suspecting); he takes her horseback riding, they walk on the beach, and have wine w/ takeout. Jeans, cozy sweaters, business suits- y’all know Bridges looks FAB in all the outfits. Close and Bridges are V well-matched; they create good chemistry together. In the tense/revelatory courtroom scenes, they convey much w/o dialogue.

[1] Bridges and Close show why they’re among the greatest stars of their generation. I can pretty much guarantee that you won’t find this movie boring. 

[2] This courtroom thriller was one of the films that spawned a huge wave of copycats through the mid ’80’s and early ’90’s. […]

…the film works very well on a visceral level, providing twists and shocks along the way (including one startling break-in near the end which is jarring no matter how many times it is seen.) The film’s greatest strength is the acting, notably Close. […] She brings great conviction to her poorly conceived role. Bridges does well also as the perfectly moussed, tan dreamboat who might be a savage murderer. Loggia brings a welcome salty edge to the film with his foul-mouthed portrayal of Close’s investigator friend.

The discordant music by Barry is very unsettling and his use of low piano keys doubtlessly inspired Jerry Goldsmith for “Basic Instinct.” It’s the same type of sound. Folks expecting a watertight story will be disappointed. Those who just want to be entertained and spooked should love it.

[3] The ending was cause for much discussion back in the day, and viewing it now it still feels like a moment of cheek mixed in with some form of clarity, but rest assured it works well, as does, funnily enough, the whole film. No world beater here, but highly accomplished and worth the time of any thriller obsessed movie fan. 

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Kindness of Strangers” (2019) starring Zoe Kazan, Andrea Riseborough, Tahar Rahim, Caleb Landry Jones, Jay Baruchel, & Bill Nighy

Emma5 Comments

Clara (Zoe Kazan- an American) and her two young sons (Anthony and Jude) drive from their small town to NYC. Alice (Andrea Riseborough- a Brit) runs a forgiveness support group out of a church; Marc (Tahar Rahim- a Frenchman w/ Algerian heritage) and his lawyer/friend, John Peter (Jay Baruchel- a Canadian), are recent members. While searching for food at a Russian restaurant (The Winter Palace), Clara meets Marc, who has been given the chance to revitalize the eatery by the owner, Tim (Bill Nighy- a Brit/also served as a producer). After their car is towed away, Clara’s family meets Alice (an ER nurse), who gets them into a shelter. A young/jobless man, Jeff (Caleb Landy Jones- an American), comes upon this shelter and becomes a volunteer.

The title of this indie film (free on several streaming platforms) comes from the Tennessee Williams’s play A Streetcar Named Desire. Blanche Dubois declares “I have always depended on the kindness of strangers” at the finale. The play was adapted into a movie directed by Elia Kazan, the grandfather of Zoe. The writer/director of The Kindness of Strangers is a Danish woman, Lone Scherfig; she directed a (must-see) drama- An Education (2009)- starring Carey Mulligan and Peter Sarsgaard. One reviewer was reminded of Frank Capra (a 1st gen Italian-American); this filmmaker’s movies carried positive messages and focused on the shared humanity of Americans. This film (which premiered at the Berlin Film Festival) was shot in NYC, Canada (Ontario), and Denmark.

The Kindness of Strangers has an understated quality, though there are some serious issues explored, incl. domestic abuse, unemployment, homelessness, lack of family/community support, and loneliness. Though the speed of life in NYC is fast, the pacing here allows us to notice each character of the fine international/ensemble cast. Kazan (who may be more known for rom coms) does V well w/ drama here; your heart just goes out to her character! Rahim is NOT only handsome/graceful (perhaps b/c he’s French IRL), he has a quiet intensity onscreen (as his character is mostly reserved). I admired the look of the film; the cinematographer is Sebastian Blenkov. Have you noticed that romantic scenes (dir. by women) are usually quite effective/memorable? There is a kiss btwn Kazan and Rahim which is full of emotion and (heartfelt) desire.

[1] Brilliant story, brilliant acting, brilliant directing. […] From the very beginning, it captures you; quite sad at some points, but it just kept getting better.

[2] The success of the movie depends on how Zoe Kazan carries her part and she carries it well. Good movie for anyone who has an interest in human relations.

[3] Homelessness is one thematic layer to a story that investigates kindness as the social glue that matters most and is possibly also the most underrated of dispositions or inclinations, often being seen as weak or oversensitive. Personally, I found it a lovely film, quite moving in places with its acknowledgment that, without kindness and the generosity of strangers, society would fall apart.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews