“In the Cut” (2003) starring Meg Ryan, Mark Ruffalo, & Jennifer Jason Leigh

Everything you know about desire is dead wrong. -Tagline

On the LES of NYC, Frannie Avery (Meg Ryan- age 41 and de-glamorized)- a college English teacher/writer- begins an affair w/ Det. Giovanni Malloy (Mark Ruffalo- age 35 w/ a mustache)- one of the cops investigating the murder of a young woman. Malloy’s partner, Det. Ritchie Rodriguez, is played by Nick Damici (who I haven’t seen in any other movies/shows). Malloy believes the murder is the work of a serial killer. Frannie continues her relationship w/ Malloy, even after catching him in a lie (which could be dangerous). This is the (controversial) film that tanked Ryan’s acting career and derailed that of director Jane Campion. Originally, Nicole Kidman (who served as a producer) wanted to play Frannie. She decided to drop out, as she was going through a (much publicized) divorce from Tom Cruise. Mickey Rourke was considered for a supporting role; however, he was allegedly vetoed by Kidman b/c of his hard-partying reputation. The film is based on a 1996 novel by Susanna Moore.

Frannie: I was at the Red Turtle with one of my students.

Det. Rodriguez: One of your students?

Frannie: Cornelius Webb, but it was early, three-thirty. I was there for a short time, then I went home.

Det. Malloy: Cornelius Webb. Is that with two B’s or not two B’s?

It’s rare to see an erotic thriller (or neo noir) from the POV of a (complicated/independent) woman, as many critics/podcasters/viewers have commented. Usually, the male cop is the central figure, as in Laura (1944) or Basic Instinct (1992). Ruffalo went undercover w/ NYPD officers to prepare for his role. Malloy is macho, rough-hewn, and uses the language of the streets. However, he can also be soft-spoken, compassionate, and witty. Pauline (Jennifer Jason Leigh- age 40) is Frannie’s slightly younger/half-sister; the women have a close/warm relationship. Pauline is a stylist who lives above a go-go (strip) bar; she’s self-aware, yet looking for love (in ALL the wrong places). The costumes were bought from the The Job (2001), a cancelled TV show, for only $400.

I think the scenes are really good though, I think they’re very honest. Jane didn’t want them to be coy, so I don’t think they are at all. And I love how much dialogue is in those scenes. That’s what makes them really intimate. -Meg Ryan re: the love scenes (at TIFF during film’s debut)

Warning: This film NOT for sensitive viewers (incl. those expecting the rom com version of Ryan); it’s gritty, bloody, w/ dark themes and nudity. I saw this movie (which has an R-rated and Unrated versions) many yrs ago; it’s now available to rent (Amazon Prime video). Last week, I came across a (new) pod review of it, so decided to take a (2nd) look. One common complaint from viewers was that characters don’t develop or change. They’re also unapologetic re: their desires. This may remind some of you of European films. One of the main notes Campion gave to Ruffalo was “never apologize.” The filmmakers create an undercurrent of foreboding, showing us how it’s like to be a (big city) woman who is being perceived by (potentially dangerous/deadly) men.

[1] Ryan has never been better than she is here. She plays Frannie almost as if she were one of the urban walking dead, just right for a modern woman who feels no real emotional connection with the world and the people around her.

Mark Ruffalo is excellent as the cop who may be more of a threat to Frannie than the killer who’s terrorizing the area.

[2] This is certainly one of the most unique films I have come across, but I don’t say that in an overly positive manner. It is a very good-looking film, and ignoring camera angles and editing techniques, it still looks very solid on a visual scope.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Port Authority” (2019): From Executive Producer Martin Scorsese

Port Authority is a love story set in New York’s ballroom scene, and follows Paul, a 20 y.o. from Pittsburgh, who arrives at the central bus station and quickly catches eyes w/ Wye, a 22 y.o. voguing on the sidewalk. After Paul seeks her out in secret, an intense love btwn them blossoms. But when Paul discovers Wye is trans, he is forced to confront his own identity and what it means to belong. -Synopsis (Variety)

Here is a brief description of Ball culture (via Wikipedia): The Ballroom scene (AKA Ballroom community, Ballroom culture, or just Ballroom) is an African-American and Latino underground LGBTQ+ subculture. Its origins can be found in drag balls of the mid-19th C. US, such as those hosted by William Dorsey Swann, a formerly enslaved Black man in D.C. By the early 20th C, integrated drag balls were popular in cities such as New York, Chicago, New Orleans, Baltimore, and Philadelphia. In the mid-20th C, as a response to racism in integrated drag spaces, the balls evolved into house ballroom, where Black and Latino attendees could “walk” in a variety of categories for trophies and cash prizes. Most participants in ballroom belong to groups known as “houses”, where chosen families of friends form relationships and communities separate from their families of origin, from which they may be estranged.

This coming-of-age drama is the directorial debut of Danielle Lessovitz; she made the movie w/ grants from the Torino Film Lab, CNC Cinema du Monde (France), and New York Council of the Arts. Paul is played by Fionn Whitehead, a dark-haired/brown-eyed Brit who was cast (at just 19 y.o.) in Dunkirk (2017) directed by Christopher Nolan. Whitehead began acting at 13 in youth theaters in his native London; he hails from a family of creatives. He is also the lead in Black Mirror: Bandersnatch; I haven’t seen this movie yet (though do like the Black Mirror streaming series). Wye is played by Leyna Bloom (a trans model/actress) who appeared in the FX series Pose; I’ve seen S1 (so far). Bloom hails from Chicago; she has a Black American father and Filipina mother. She trained in various styles of dance since 6th grade; at only 14 y.o. – she performed at the American Ballet Theater w/ Misty Copeland.

Martin Scorsese served as one of the executive producers; I learned this while listening to a Screen Drafts podcast ep on his work. Why would Scorsese be interested in this particular story, some may wonder? Well, this film is set in NYC and delves into group dynamics, power, violence, and masculinity (common in his directorial work). The group of young/white men that Paul comes to live/work w/ is led by Lee (McCaul Lombardi), who is handsome, street-smart, and a bit older (mid-20s) than the others. Late one night on the subway, Lee helps Paul out after the newcomer beaten up by thugs. Lombardi hails from Baltimore, is of Italian-American heritage, and appeared in American Honey (2016) directed by Andrea Arnold (a Cannes selection).

Our early 20s can be a challenging time; perhaps we go away from parents/home, attend college, enter the “adult”/work world, make new friends, etc. The characters here are facing poverty, housing insecurity, and violence on the streets (incl. for things they can’t control- race and physical presentation). Lee and his followers at the shelter hustle to make money by procuring/ selling furniture, electronics, etc, using their race privilege against poor POC/immigrants. Paul goes along w/ them, BUT gets more and more uncomfortable w/ their pushy tactics. On the other hand, Wye and her ball community are focused on self-expression, acceptance, and supporting each other.

Some critics liked the movie, BUT were disappointed that it was told from the POV of the cis/white man. Paul doesn’t feel like he has power over his life; we explains to Wye that he was in foster care and has “anger issues.” Falling in love opens Paul’s eyes up to a wider world; he’s in awe of his new feelings (and the filmmakers depict that well). Unlike him, Wye is comfortable in her own skin, moves gracefully, and has a found family in her “house” (where the young men are her “brothers”). I wanted to see more of the house “mother” (who had 2 good scenes). If you like gritty/realistic and intimate character stories, you can check this out on streaming (for free).

[1] The choice of close-up which make majority of the movie, makes it personal. You feel what the characters are feeling. Watch this movie if you like character driven dramas.

[2] I had the extraordinary opportunity to meet the director back in late 2019, in a Q&A that took place in the Official Language School right after the screening in Gijon’s Film Festival where I first saw the movie. She was so kind and committed to direct the film with heart and mind in the right place, taking a complex thematic involving the identity (in more ways than one) and staying true to the roots.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Dead Don’t Hurt” (2023) starring Vicky Krieps, Viggo Mortensen, Solly McLeod, Garret Dillahunt, & Danny Huston

The Dead Don’t Hurt is a portrait of a passionate woman determined to stand up for herself in an unforgiving world dominated by ruthless men. -Excerpt from synopsis from Shout! Studios

I saw an online ad for this feminist Western drama recently; it was written/directed by Viggo Mortensen. He also composed the musical score- wow, talk about wearing many hats! Though this story is set in the 1860s (Civil War era), it asks Qs that men and women are facing today. At the center is this issue: How does one navigate a romantic relationship w/o losing one’s own personality and independence? To add weight here, the leads are already mature (middle-aged) and have lived according to their own wishes for some time. In an NPR interview, Mortensen (who plays Holger Olsen) said that Vivienne Le Coudy (Vicky Krieps) is partly based on his (French-Canadian) mother: “As w/ her time, she was a mother and a housewife. But she was not going to let anyone tell her how to think.”

Mortensen did NOT intend to act in the film, BUT “late in the game,” the actor who’d originally been cast left to work on a different project. Krieps (originally from Luxembourg; based in Berlin) suggested he take the role himself. Olsen was then aged up and made Danish (like his own father). The war which Olsen fought in was presumably the First Schleswig War (1848-1851) in which Denmark fought the German Federation for control of the regions of Schleswig-Holstein; Denmark was the winner. As he noted on The Late Show, the knight that appears in young Vivienne’s dreams carries a familiar sword: Anduril- Aragorn’s sword from The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003).

The film has some beautiful landscapes/scenery; it was shot in Vancouver, British Columbia and Mexico (w/ a mostly Mexican crew). Four languages are heard: English, French, Spanish and Danish; in some scenes, languages are mixed w/in the same line of dialogue. Y’all immigrants and 1st gen Americans will relate to that! The cast is international: in San Fran, we see “old money” gentleman Lewis Cartwright (Colin Morgan: Irish); in the Western town, Mr. Jeffries (Garret Dillahunt: American) is the powerful businessman; his son Weston (w/ a strong resemblance to Dillahunt- Solly MacLeod) is a newcomer from Scotland seen in S1 of House of the Dragon); and Mayor Schiller (Danny Huston: American/son of John Huston). These men are on the taller side (close to/over 6 ft.) Fans of Deadwood (HBO) will recognize two characters played by W. Earl Brown and Ray McKinnon.

I thought that there was great (natural) chemistry btwn Mortensen and Krieps; you really buy them as a couple! Krieps is slim and tall (5’9″), so well-matched physically w/ Mortensen. The film takes time to get going w/ its plot; we get to know the characters. There are time jumps, BUT I didn’t think those posed any problem. The main issue is its pacing; otherwise, I was impressed w/ the film as a whole. I look forward to seeing more of Mortensen’s directing!

“Poor Things” (2023) starring Emma Stone, Mark Ruffalo, Willem Dafoe, Rami Youssef, Christopher Abbott, & Jerrod Carmichael

From filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos and producer Emma Stone comes the incredible tale and fantastical evolution of Bella Baxter (Stone), a young woman brought back to life by the brilliant and unorthodox scientist Dr. Godwin Baxter (Willem Dafoe). Under Baxter’s protection, Bella is eager to learn. Hungry for the worldliness she is lacking, Bella runs off with Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo), a slick and debauched lawyer, on a whirlwind adventure across the continents. Free from the prejudices of her times, Bella grows steadfast in her purpose to stand for equality and liberation. -Synopsis from Searchlight Pictures)

Wow, what to say re: this movie!? It seems like viewers either loved it, hated it, or were simply confused! I saw it (on streaming) several mos. after it was released in theaters. Being always online (& a listener of movie pods) I learned a LOT about this before watching. I think there are some scenes that you can enjoy, IF you considered this an alternate universe (AU), a BIT like Bridgerton (Netflix). Well, it’s NOT always pretty like that Regency era show. The visual style is unique and eye-catching, as are the costumes and sets (part of production design). Now, Poor Things is NOT for those of y’all who are sensitive re: cursing, nudity, sex, and body horror (reminiscent at times of Canadian auteur David Cronenberg). The run time is TOO long, BUT that is not rare for recent films.

This is mostly a character study centered on Bella (Stone); she “grows up” from a toddler (as she has the brain of a child) to an adult young woman (capable of making her own choices). Do you think that Stone (who also produced this film) deserved that Oscar for Best Actress? Bella decides to to leaver her “father”- Dr. Godwin Baxter AKA “God” (Dafoe)- and start a romance w/ his lawyer, Duncan (Ruffalo). Sorry to say, Ruffalo is NOT working for me here; I’m a fan of his acting usually. Sometimes actors need to be pulled back by their directors, though I doubt Lanthimos asked for that. In the 2nd act, we meet a young American played by Carmichael; he’s a funny/smart stand-up, comedy writer, producer, etc. However, his style of acting/manner of speaking doesn’t fit w/in this world; it just took me out of the story. I thought that Dafoe and Youssef were quire good w/ all that they were given. Many weren’t amused by the way that sex work is handled in this movie; however, the filmmakers aren’t reflecting the real world. Feminism is NOT just about traveling or reading books- of course. No one can say that Lanthimos is risk-averse, that’s for sure! I was disappointed- that’s the conclusion.

[1] I do recommend this if you like the unusual art film. But I can see it as not being everyone’s idea of a fun time at the movies.

I might almost pair it up with “Barbie” as a thematic double feature as both films explore feminism in 2 very different ways.

[2] Completely over the top, mind boggling romp through the imagination of the main character on a journey of self-discovery and a relentless degree of self-indulgence.

[3] It’s a very very very specific type of weird, that won’t be for everyone. […] It’s like a fever dream on the strangest cocktail of psychedelics. If it happens to be your kind of weird, you will love it.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Love Crime” (2010) starring Ludivine Sagnier, Kristin Scott Thomas, & Patrick Mille

An elegant business exec, Christine Rivière (Kristin Scott Thomas- who speaks fluent French), brings on Isabelle Guérin (Ludivine Sagnier) as her protege. Christine seems to enjoy toying w/ the young/naive woman. Christine is involved w/ Phillipe (Patrick Mille), an arrogant/charming lawyer who consults w/ this company. Soon, Isabelle’s ideas become creative enough for Christine to pass off as her own. In time, we see that Christine has underestimated Isabelle’s ambition/cunning!

As one viewer commented, this is “not a whodunit, but more of a what’s-she-gonna-do next” story. I heard about this French neo noir film on the Fatal Attractions podcast. Alain Corneau (1943-2010) was a Cesar Award-winning French writer/director; he died soon after Love Crime was released. The American remake (undercooked and boring) was titled Passion (2012); it was directed by Brian De Palma and stars Rachel McAdams and Noomi Rapace. If you like this movie, you may want to check out The Business of Strangers (2001) starring Stockard Channing and Julia Stiles.

The French ain’t like us (Americans) y’all- that can be surprising (yet refreshing) to watch! They don’t need big budgets, expensive sets, action scenes, or likeable lead characters. They also don’t carry the (Puritan) baggage when is comes to nudity, sex, or relationships btwn men and women. After a meeting out of town, Isabelle jumps into Phillipe’s arms and kisses him w/ fervor (looks a BIT aggressive). These women are battling it out in (and out) of the boardroom! The filmmakers don’t shy away from melodrama. If you like psychological thrillers, then I recommend this movie.

…Mr. Corneau makes witty use of the contrasting faces and temperaments of the two main actresses. Ms. Thomas, her manner as impeccable and dry as her French, is all angles and edges, most terrifying when she seems most at ease. Ms. Sagnier, soft and skittish and visibly struggling to maintain her composure, turns out to be even scarier.

-Excerpt from NYT review by A.O. Scott

[1] The narrative style is one of omniscient point of view. As an audience, you are along with the perpetrator for a ride all the time. The fun is in seeing (and sometimes guessing) how she uses the “self-framing” trick (think “The Wrong Man,” but in that movie the audience is in the dark and are in for a big surprise, unless they are really smart) to get away with murder, literally.

[2] What makes the film so fascinating is the clever move/countermove screenplay that provides tantalizing hints increasing skullduggery. The two female leads play beautifully off each other and the hapless men that get in their way are interesting in their own right.

[3] …here we have real human action. With women as the characters, “action” does not have to constitute external phenomena as is the case with men. For women, “action” is the deadly silent conflict between personalities, and how they outwit each other. This is a true “psychological thriller,” whereas many claims of that kind are made by films which are not all that psychological.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews