Tag: Identity

“The Handmaiden” (2016) directed by Park Chan-wook

EmmaLeave a comment

Are you a fan of erotic thrillers (which were prominent in the ’80s-’90s)? Though this is a historical drama, you’ll find elements of the erotic thriller genre. As you may’ve noticed from ads/trailers, there is a love triangle (yet w/ an unexpected twist). This is one of those films where the less you know going in, the better! It is truly unlike anything I’ve seen before; some viewers said they needed to watch it 2x to get everything that’s going on. The story is divided into 3 chapters w/ each told from a different character’s POV. The film may be 2.5 hrs. long, BUT I hardly moved from my seat! The themes are quite relevant to our world: greed (lust for money), gender/sexual repression, women’s desire, and the (potential) dangers of porn. The Handmaiden was selected to compete for the Palme d’Or at Cannes (2016). It was released in South Korea on June 1st 2016, to critical acclaim and grossed $38M worldwide. At the 71st BAFTAs, it won Best Film Not in the English Language.

This movie is inspired by the novel Fingersmith by Sarah Waters (2002) which is set in London during the 19th C. The Handmaiden is set in Korea in the 1930s under Japanese colonial rule. Before filming, Park Chan-wook (an auteur w/ an eye for beauty) sent the completed script to Waters for comments. She liked the script, though felt that it is more appropriate to say that the film was ”inspired by” her novel. The film title in Korean (Ah-ga-ssi) means The Lady, referring to Lady Hideko (Kim Min-hee); the English/international title is The Handmaiden, referring to Sook-hee (Kim Tae-ri). Both Japanese and Korean were spoken by the (mainly Korean) cast. Before shooting, the Korean actors were all assigned Japanese teachers to study the script and learn to speak Japanese. For the theatrical release, the subtitles were color coded to differentiate the two Asian languages spoken in the film: white subtitles were used for Korean, while yellow subtitles were used for Japanese.

[1] What the film does with this basic plot is enjoyable and engaging. The narrative is solid, holds the interest without effort, and is very well paced and structured. […]

The direction, production values, and general pacing of the film, all work together to give it a beautiful appearance and tone. It is quite sensuous to watch, with such great colors, sets, costumes, and designs.

[2] Adapting Sarah Waters’ Fingersmith, a Victorian tale awash with all manner of Dickensian motifs, Park spins an engrossing tale that ebbs and flows with a Hitchcockian suspense; it withholds as much as it discloses; it is an erotic tale that beats with raw fervour.

[3] If the plot and the direction weren’t amazing enough, the movie is as beautiful as they come. From the darkest moment, the most violent, to the most intimate, beauty transpires in every frame, and every scene comes to life and threatens to pop and break free from the screen.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Tequila Sunrise” (1988) starring Mel Gibson, Michelle Pfeiffer, & Kurt Russell

Emma1 Comment

A dangerous mix. -Tagline

A former L.A. drug dealer tries to go straight but his past and his underworld connections bring him into the focus of the DEA, the Mexican feds and the Mexican drug cartels. -Synopsis

This is a neo noir (written/directed by Robert Towne) set in LA; it’s streaming on Max (formerly HBO Max). It was also shown on TCM’s Noir Alley. I must’ve seen it MANY yrs ago (maybe as a teen) b/c I recalled V little about it (aside from the hot/famous cast). It’s trying to be edgy, as the good guy is an ex-drug dealer and the cops/feds are baddies. There is a love triangle of 2 men (friends since HS) and one woman; this is unusual for mainstream Hollywood. Critics are mixed re: this movie; some enjoyed it, while others noticed the (many) flaws.

Jo Ann: I’m sorry. I was just joking. I didn’t mean to hurt you.

Mac: Aw, come on. It didn’t hurt that bad. Just looking at you hurts more.

What’s up w/ the odd title? When the DEA agent, Maguire (J.T. Walsh), is listening to surveillance tapes of restaurant owner, Jo Ann Vallenari (Michelle Pfeiffer), she’s heard offering Dale “Mac” McKussic (Mel Gibson) a cocktail (Tequila Sunrise). FYI: The drink consists of tequila, orange juice, and grenadine syrup. The producers wanted Harrison Ford and Jeff Bridges for the male co-leads; that could’ve been a better movie. Gibson was V popular then; he’d recently been in Lethal Weapon; Mac is more nuanced than Det. Riggs (trying to be a good father). Russell (acting since childhood) was known for his likeability and work in the action genre; Lt. Nick Frescia is NOT so nice though. Pat Riley (coach of the LA Lakers) provided the inspo for Nick’s look (suits and slicked-back hair).

Jo Ann: Mr. McKussic, it seems, has been engaged in his business for purely romantic reasons, whilst you have been engaged in romance for purely business reasons.
Nick: I’m not sure I understand.
Jo Ann: A little vague for you?
Nick: A little.
Jo Ann: Well, then, let me spell it out for you: you want to f**k your friend, then f**k him, not me!

Did these (mostly male) writers and producers have any (female) friends!? Mac’s ex-wife is depicted as vain/money-obsessed; she gets V little screen time. As some viewers noted, neither Nick not Mac is good enough for Jo Ann! Pfeiffer (in mostly cream-colored outfits) is doing her best w/ Jo Ann’s (shallow/contradictory) characterization. She didn’t get along w/ Towne; he called her “the most difficult actress I have ever worked with.” The actress was going through a divorce at this time. There is a (infamous) love scene; the hot tub was NOT built properly/chlorinated. Pfeiffer, her body double, and Gibson got skin rashes and splinters from the wood- ouch! Production shut down for a few days while they recovered.

Carlos [to Mac]: You son of a bitch! How could you do this? Friendship is the only choice in life you can make that’s yours! You can’t choose your family, God damn it – I’ve had to face that! And no man should be judged for whatever direction his d**k goes – that’s like blaming a compass for pointing north, for Christ’s sake! Friendship is all we have! We chose each other. How could you f**k it up? How could you make us look so bad?

The dialogue can be good (at times), BUT also quite cheesy/predictable. The plot and editing are often confusing; Roget Ebert commented: “It feels like there are chunks of the movie cut out.” The filmmakers could’ve made better (more nuanced) choices. I expected Mac to die at the end of the film; that would’ve made more sense! Towne wanted that ending also, BUT producers said Gibson had to be alive. Is there anything fun re: this movie? Well, Gibson is shirtless in several scenes (in FAB shape). The kid playing Mac’s son (Cody) does a good job in his small role. When the main villain, Carlos (Raul Julia), appears- he steals the movie! Julia (a trained singer) sings some; he does the best he can w/ what he has been given. A young Matt LeBlanc (Friends) appears on the TV; this was a real commercial for Heinz ketchup.

Spoiler-Free Review: “Barbie” (2023) starring Margot Robbie & Ryan Gosling

Emma3 Comments

Barbie suffers a crisis that leads her to question her world and her existence. -Synopsis

She’s everything. He’s just Ken. -Tagline

Summer has (traditionally) been the season for family-friendly/crowd-pleasing movies. As you may know, both Barbie and Oppenheimer were released on the same day (July 21) of this yr. I went to see Barbie w/ a big group of (mostly) women during its 2nd wknd at AMC (Ballston Quarter). One of my friends was esp. excited; she purchased 10 tickets (limit per person) several wks. ahead of our screening. I was somewhat curious, b/c I really liked the work of director/co-writer Greta Gerwig (who turned 40 y.o. last wk) and Noah Baumbach (co-writer); they’re also partners IRL and have a baby together. Gerwig and Baumbach are also close friends/collaborators w/ Adam Driver. Some skeptical critics wondered: “Who is the audience for this movie?” As I expected, my theater was full w/ (mostly) women in their 20s-40s; many were wearing pink (in various shades).

The production design is V cool; you feel immersed in the material/colorful world of Mattell toys where “Stereotypical Barbie” (Robbie), her love interest, Ken (Gosling), and all their friends live. As we saw in the trailers/ads, there are Barbies and Kens of diverse backgrounds (Issa Rae, Simu Liu, Kingsley Ben-Adir, Kate McKinnon. etc.) Alan (Michael Cera), Midge, and a few other (NOT so well-known) dolls are also there. Women are the ones who hold ALL the important jobs in this (make-believe) world! Of course, there are several human characters (played by America Ferrera, Ariana Greenblatt, Will Ferrell, etc. ) A much younger Greenblatt (now 15 y.o.) was Driver’s co-star in the action movie 65 (2023). The eclectic music suits the story well; I was NOT familiar w/ all the songs. Yes, this movie has a feminist take (as I’m sure many are aware). It also includes singing and dancing (which reminded me of technicolor musicals). There are many LOL moments, yet there are emotional/touching ones also. I hadn’t seen much of Gosling’s acting; I was surprised by how funny he could be! I do think this movie was a BIT too long; this is a common problem today. There are also a few speeches; they are NOT all effective IMO. I think a wide audience (IF they keep an open mind) can enjoy this movie; it already passed the $1B mark worldwide – wow! Two of my (mid-20s; male and female) co-workers really liked the movie; they went on opening wknd.

“Black Widow” (1987) starring Debra Winger & Theresa Russell

EmmaLeave a comment

She mates and she kills. No man can resist her. Only one woman can stop her. -Tagline

A tall/blonde/early 30s woman, Catharine Petersen (Theresa Russell), marries older (50-something) millionaires, waits until they’ve changed their wills (to leave all of their money to her), and murders them using clever methods. With each relationship, Catharine changes her appearance (hair/makeup/clothes) and personality to suit the man. Alexandra Barnes (Debra Winger) is a DOJ data analyst who finds links btwn several mysterious deaths. The more she learns of this woman, the more Alex becomes fascinated; she does field work on her own time (her co-workers and supervisor are V skeptical). Taking a wild chance, Alex flies to Hawaii to track the “black widow” (on her own)!

This (lesser known) neo noir was released about 6 mos. prior to the hit Fatal Attraction (1987). The director (Bob Rafelson) hadn’t worked on a movie since The Postman Always Rings Twice (1981); I’m NOT a fan of that remake (see the original B&W ver. instead). This movie could be a BIT shorter; there are also odd editing choices (some critics called it “choppy”). The dialogue is pretty good; the screenplay is by Ron Bass (Rain Man; My Best Friend’s Wedding). Winger (who had prior success w/ An Officer and a Gentleman and Terms of Endearment) was given the choice of the 2 co-leads; she chose Alex, b/c she didn’t understand why Catharine kills. One of the men in the poker game is David Mamet (in his 1st film); he’s best known as a director. Dennis Hopper has a small role (5 mins.) in the 1st act. We also see theater/movie veterans (Lois Smith and James Hong) in supporting roles.

Black Widow gives us a look into the (pre-internet) world of investigations; there was no facial recognition tech yet. Alex uses a slide projector to examine newspaper photos. Catharine borrows a VCR player (which is quite large) from the fancy Seattle hotel where she’s staying to watch a videotape. (I don’t think my family had a VCR then; we’d immigrated to the US in the Fall of 1986.) There is a LOT that is unsaid; there is “erotic tension” (as one astute reviewer said) btwn. the two women. Does Alex envy Catharine (who can get any man she wants)? Are the women attracted to each other? Early in the story, Alex shut down advances (gently) from her “right hand” (D.W. Moffett); there is also concern from her boss (Terry O’Quinn) who tells her (explicitly) to get a man. As Roger Ebert (who didn’t recommend it) said: “The acting is good. I expected more from this movie.” Gene Siskel liked it a LOT; he said: “Alex realized that Catharine could do something that she couldn’t- love!”

Park Chan-wook’s 1st American Movie: “Stoker” (2013) starring Mia Wasikowska, Nicole Kidman, & Matthew Goode

Emma1 Comment

India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska) was not prepared to lose her father and best friend, Richard (Dermot Mulroney), in a tragic auto accident. The solitude of her woodsy family estate, the peace of her tranquil town, and the unspoken somberness of her home life are suddenly upended by not only this mysterious accident, but by the sudden arrival of her Uncle Charlie (Matthew Goode), who she never knew existed. When Charlie moves in with her and her emotionally unstable mother Evie (Nicole Kidman), India thinks the void left by her father’s death is finally being filled by his closest bloodline. Soon after his arrival, India comes to suspect that this mysterious, charming man has ulterior motives. Yet instead of feeling outrage or horror, this friendless young woman becomes increasingly infatuated with him.

-Synopsis (Fox Searchlight Pictures)

India: You look like my father.

Charles: I am so sorry.

India: It’s your loss, too.

This is probably a film that most of you haven’t heard of before; I learned about it from the Fatal Attractions pod (which focuses on the erotic thriller genre). This is the 1st American movie helmed by South Korean director Park Chan-wook. The screenwriter is also a man of color, Wentworth Miller (best-known as the star of Prison Break); he graduated from Princeton w/ a degree in English Lit. Stoker is inspired by Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt (1943); there is a mysterious uncle who re-emerges into the life of a family after many yrs. of absence. It soon becomes obvious that this man could be dangerous.

India: He [her father] used to say, sometimes you need to do something bad to stop you from doing something worse.

This film (w/ a run time of 1 hr. 39 mins.) is a character-driven thriller which is moody, atmospheric, and tense (though NOT in an obvious way). The pacing may seem slow to some viewers, as it takes some time for the plot to get moving. The main location is an elegant/historic estate in Nashville, TN. Though they play Americans, Wasikowska and Kidman are Aussies and Goode is a Brit. Two of India’s classmates (Alden Ehrenreich and Lucas Till) would go on to their own movies and TV shows in a few yrs.

Mia’s posture: her stillness and her straightness speaks to the personality of a character who likes everything ordered around her. -Park Chan-wook, director

We know that life as a teen can be V tough, esp. when you don’t fit in w/ your family and/or peers. Evie laments the fact that she and India don’t have a close relationship; India was more of a “daddy’s girl” (we see them hunting/bonding in flashback). India is an outcast at her HS; she wears a sullen expression, doesn’t speak much, and dislikes being touched. After school, a few of the boys bully her w/ insults (yikes), though there is one boy who is sympathetic. India plays the piano, as does her Uncle Charlie; this brings them together in a (pivotal) scene. So far, I’ve seen Wasikowska in HBO’s In Treatment, Jane Eyre (2011), and Tracks (2013) co-starring Adam Driver. I think that (like Driver) she has intensity onscreen (even w/o speaking) and plays troubled/sensitive characters V well. If you’re looking for something out of the ordinary, you can rent this movie (Amazon).

[1] The look and feel of Stoker is impressive. The atmosphere is well-sustained throughout. If I had a criticism, it would simply be that the story ultimately isn’t all that original and there aren’t really a lot of surprises. What it does do though is to take a fairly standard psychological thriller story and make it interesting by way of cinematic techniques.

[2] The film has a set of amazing talents. […] The violence is a bit tamed for a Chan-wook Park film, but here, he aims more at the fortitude. He fills them with an impressively energetic style which helps executing its eeriness. The gorgeous cinematography captures the melancholia of their world. Everything is just stunning.

...the film rather tests the anxiety of the audience in these strange haunting exteriors. The film is not trying to be innovative, but the reason why it’s interesting is because of its intense use of filmmaking styles.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews