“Lions for Lambs” (2007) starring Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, & Tom Cruise

Injuries sustained by two Army rangers behind enemy lines in Afghanistan set off a sequence of events involving a senator, a journalist and a professor. -Synopsis

This out-of-the box film (directed by Robert Redford, who passed away recently at age 89) consists of 3 separate (yet interconnected) segments. The time is our (recent) past, Dubya is the prez, and there is (seemingly unending) war in the Middle East. Many viewers were most interested in the interview between the experienced political journo, Janine Roth (Meryl Streep), and a youthful Republican politician, Sen. Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise). They discuss foreign-policy in a war of choice, now running longer than WWII. The senator (a military adviser to the prez) is trying to convince Janine into “selling” a new plan of attack in Afghanistan. In a SoCal university, Prof. Stephen Malley (Redford), a Poly Sci prof has a meeting w/ a bright (yet recently slacking) student, Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield).

Sen. Jasper Irving: [to Janine] In sense we’re both on the same team. We’re teammates. We’re both have a responsibility. You’ve already sold the war. Now I’m asking you to help me sell the solution.

The film is short and stays mostly to the point of a debate weighing the pros and cons of war, terrorism, and freedom. The photo on the senator’s office wall (Cruise dressed as a West Point cadet) is a still photo from Taps (1981). Alternating w/ the other segments are scenes in Afghanistan featuring two Army rangers, Arian Finch (Derek Luke) and his BFF, Ernest Rodriguez (Michael Peña). They’re POC and recent college grads who chose to enlist. What lives are most at risk in times of war? It’s the youth, esp. men of color and/or those living in poverty, as Prof. Malley explains to Todd (white, raised w/ privilege, and from an upper-middle class neighborhood). Check it out (on Amazon Prime video) if you’re looking for something different.

Prof. Stephen Malley: The decisions you make now, bud, can’t be changed but with years and years of hard work to redo it… And in those years you become something different. Everybody does as the time passes. You get married, you get into debt… But you’re never gonna be the same person you are right now. And promise and potential… It’s very fickle, and it just might not be there anymore.
Todd Hayes: Are you assuming I already made a decision? And also that I’ll live to regret it?
Prof. Stephen Malley: All I’m saying is that you’re an adult now… And the tough thing about adulthood is that it starts before you even know it starts, when you’re already a dozen decisions into it. But what you need to know, Todd, no lifeguard is watching anymore. You’re on your own. You’re your own man, and the decisions you make now are yours and yours alone from here until the end.

[1] It is not a perfect film in some regards, but it is not preaching but rather challenging all viewers, no matter what you think, to get involved, to take part, to question things, to think for one’s self. It is thought-provoking and challenging and for that it is well worth seeing for yourself.

[2] …the movie is not about a heroic battle or an indelible mistake by a over zealous, self absorbed government. It is about understanding a mindset. If any of you have ever read Francis Fukuyama… its about history repeating itself.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

20th Anniversary: “Pride & Prejudice” & “Star Wars: Episode III – The Revenge of the Sith”

Recently, there were special events (incl. re-releases) centered on 2 much loved (and much-maligned) blockbuster movies from my mid-20s- Pride and Prejudice (P&P) and Star Wars: Episode III – The Revenge of the Sith (TRS). Nostalgia is a big thing these days, esp. among those who are Xennials (b. 1977-1983) and Millennials (b. 1981-1996). Were you a fan (or hater) of P&P and/or TRS upon 1st release? Have you re-watched these movies? Have your opinions changed? Let me know your thoughts (in comments below)!

P&P (which boasted a cast of soon-to-be famous/cute/young faces) is an important film to my fam: we watched it in the theater over Thanksgiving 2005 (w/ my future BIL)! On a recent re-watch, I realized that it’s still a fun/well-made movie, though NOT accurate to Jane Austen’s book (as many have said in past). The young/British director, Joe Wright, had a fresh/controversial take on the Bennett fam (incl. their farm-style home, hairstyles, clothes, and-perhaps a BIT too quirky- personalities). I was (again) impressed by ALL the British character actors. When it came to casting, Rosamund Pike (who studied Austen in college) fitted the role of Jane perfectly. The best things about this adaptation are its music (composed by Dario Marinelli) and Matthew McFadyen. The tall/theatrically-trained actor conveys Mr. Darcy’s (unspoken) shyness, sadness (he lost parents when young), and vulnerability. And when Darcy (a socially awkward hero) finally smiles- wow, he wins over the audience!

In the climax of TRS, Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen)- in Sith mode- declares to his Jedi mentor/BFF, Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor): “If you’re not with me, then you’re my enemy!” For the “olds” (like me), this may remind you of former prez. (Dubya’s) words after 9/11: “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Is the acting good? Well, it’s a mixed bag; Chancellor/Emperor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) is compelling/effective in his scenes. The film’s most important element is Anakin’s seduction to the Dark Side of the Force by Palpatine. One reviewer on IMDb said: “He is the lifeblood of the film.” Is the writing good? Well, it’s still basic (as w/ the 2 earlier prequels). Is the directing (by Lucas himself) effective? This is tough to judge, but Star Wars fans know Lucas is infamous for NOT saying much to help along the performance of his actors. There are times when I cringed, wondering why he didn’t give the actors another take of a scene. The first 20 mins. (mainly action) are quite exciting, as are the final 30 mins. (incl. the battle btwn. Anakin and Obi-Wan). The music (composed by John Williams) continues to be impressive, as you’d expect. Hey, I still got a BIT emotional at the end- I’m NOT immune to nostalgia!

“The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial” (1988 & 2023)

The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (1988) starring Eric Bogosian, Jeff Daniels, & Brad Davis

This TV movie is an adaptation (originally staged as a play) of the court-martial segment from the novel The Caine Mutiny. The play premiered at the Plymouth Theatre in NYC on January 20, 1954. The original cast included Henry Fonda (Barney Greenwald), John Hodiak (Lt. Maryk) and Lloyd Nolan (Lt. Cdr. Queeg). James Garner appeared as a member of the court; he was the understudy to Hodiak. The play ran for 415 performances, closing on January 22, 1955. I know what some of y’all are thinking: there used to be smart movies on TV!? The script is V literate and gives most of us (civilians) insight into Naval protocol, attitudes, traditions, and conflicts btwn. personalities. As one viewer commented: “we see the usual [Robert] Altman technique of a lot of side conversations that are barely heard and added noises to make the film seem more naturalistic.”

Lt. Greenwald (Eric Bogosian- a theater actor/police capt. on L&O: CI) as the defense attorney sustains ambivalence; he does a good job, exuding caged-in intensity. As the defendant, Lt. Steven Maryk (Jeff Daniels) must decide whether his lawyer is capable or unreliable. The prosecutor, Lt. Cmdr. John Challee, is played by Peter Gallagher (a theater actor; D.A. on L&O: SVU). Lt. Cmdr. Queeg (Brad Davis) may be mentally ill; I hadn’t seen Davis before (he died at age 41 in 1991). Unlike in the remake (below), ethnicity/religion is mentioned (Greenwald is Jewish).

[1] Each “author” of the Caine mutiny is a plausible bad guy who lends slightly different emphases to instigators who escape blame for what they goad others into doing.

Davis’s Queeg raises the intriguing possibility that an officer might be flat-out nutty in a way difficult for psychiatrists to detect but easy for an attorney to expose. […] I agree that the caricature of the psychiatrist is hokey.

[2] …it is taught and claustrophobic for most of the story – being set in the court-martial room (a bit of the end of the play is at the post-trial acquittal party). The results is a different telling of the story, and one relying on the audience’s own evaluation of the truth or lies of the different witnesses.

…Queeg is first taken down a peg by Greenwald (Eric Bogosian) not on issues of fitness of command, but on his honesty.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

The Caine Mutiny Court-Martial (2023) starring Kiefer Sutherland, Jason Clarke, & Jake Lacy

Some of y’all (cinephiles) may’ve heard re: this one, as it was the last film directed by William Friedkin (who passed away at age 86 in AUG 2023). Lance Riddick (Capt. Luther Blakely) also passed away before the movie’s release; he’s a strong screen presence and gives a fine performance. For insurance purposes, Guillermo del Toro was the back-up director. Friedkin completed filming in 14 days (wow); he was given just 15 days by the studio! This movie (which was released on VOD) has well-known faces, as well as some newcomers; I saw it 1st on a flight last Thanksgiving.

Queeg (Kiefer Sutherland) here is much older (unlike in the original play by Herman Wouk); he has a constrained way of speaking here. The defense counsel, Greenwald (Jason Clarke- a prolific Aussie character actor), hasn’t practiced law much; he is the most fleshed out character. The no-nonsense prosecutor, Challee, is played by a young/Latina woman (Monica Raymund). Maryk is played by boy-next-door actor Jake Lacy (w/ big eyes/open face); he has lately done more on streaming shows than movies. I was a BIT disappointed, as I wanted to know more re: Keefer (Lewis Pullman- son of Bill Pullman; recently seen in Top Gun: Maverick). Keefer ended up writing a novel (based on this incident); it’s revealed that he influenced Maryk’s decisions.

[1] The original Caine Mutiny was a Humphrey Bogart led movie from 1954, one that I love and sticks in my memory very well. This takes notes form that movie, but is not really a remake, just an intensified treatise on the ending with the court martial hearing drug out and the final denouncement of the young opportunist shown his comeuppance. Anyone familiar with the source material, movie or book it was based on would know this. […]

The underlying theme of The Caine Mutiny story is not “wow that guy went crazy” – it’s that well, even the best among us can crack. There is no villain, it is all perspective, and even though a wrong decision was made by Caine himself the question is were there ulterior motives involved by other people.

[2] Yes, the ending could have been lengthened and strengthened a bit to really let the viewer know, but then again, here we have a Captain that does some outlandish things, but was that enough to justify a mutiny? You have to really decide the verdict. […]

Some people may have problems with the way the Navy is portrayed in this film, in that they don’t understand that as the captain of a US Navy vessel, one is completely and ultimately responsible for every little thing that happens on or to that boat, good or bad, and that as a result, discipline, rank, and orders must be maintained…

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Dune: Part Two” (2024) starring Timothee Chalamet, Zendaya, Rebecca Ferguson, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin, Austin Butler, & Florence Pugh

Paul Atreides (Timothee Chalamet) unites w/ Chani (Zendaya) and the Fremen while on a warpath of revenge against the conspirators who destroyed his family. Facing a choice btwn the love of his life and the fate of the known universe, he endeavors to prevent a terrible future only he can foresee. -Synopsis (WB)

Are y’all ready for sand, flowing capes, intricate headgear, and swords!? I saw this movie during the 2nd week of its release (w/ a good-sized crowd at AFI). I didn’t see it in IMAX; I was still impressed w/ the visuals and the music. I enjoyed it, as I did w/ the 1st part released in the pandemic (streamed on MAX). A LOT more happens here; the story (which picks up the moment after the end of the 1st movie) becomes more expansive. Paul has grown-up more; he’s learning new skills, adapting to the new environment, and working to fit in w/ the Fremen leadership, esp. Stilgar (Javier Bardem), who some viewers dubbed Paul’s “hype man.” Stilgar is the 1st one to believe in Paul as “the prophet.” In a pivotal scene, we see Paul take on the name “Muad’Dib” (desert mouse). Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) gains power of her own and gets much more to do; I was eager for her scenes. Paul and Chani admire and respect each other; they fall in love; I found it to be done in a quiet and gentle manner.

I’m a strong believer that when it’s not in the movie, it’s dead. I kill darlings, and it’s painful for me. Sometimes I remove shots and I say, “I cannot believe I’m cutting this out.” I feel like a samurai opening my gut. It’s painful, so I cannot go back after that and create a Frankenstein and try to reanimate things that I killed. It’s too painful. When it’s dead, it’s dead, and it’s dead for a reason. But yes, it is a painful project, but it is my job. The movie prevails. I’m very, I think, severe in the editing room. I’m not thinking about my ego, I’m thinking about the movie. -Denis Villeneuve, explaining that there would be no deleted scenes released

Contrary to the usual practice, Dune (2021) and Dune: Part Two (2024) were NOT filmed back-to-back, and the studio’s approval of the 2nd film very much hinged on the success of the 1st, which was complicated by a fixed release date and the COVID-19 pandemic. Still, Denis Villeneuve (director) said that production company (Legendary Pictures) loved the 1st film, so was “ready to go to war to make the second one.” The sequel was officially greenlit on October 26th, 2021, 4 days after Dune (2021) had its US release. The language of the Fremen is named Chakobsa in Frank Herbert’s novels, which derives from IRL Arabic; it also contains some French, Greek, Romani, and Slavic (w/ heavy alterations of Hebrew and Sanskrit). The filmmakers often chose desert locations based on specific sand dunes having a certain shape that Villeneuve wanted, or the perfect sun orientation that Greig Fraser (cinematographer) needed. The crew had to walk in tight corridors, so NOT to disturb the sand w/ footprints before filming. Afterwards, a special “sand team” would sweep the sands to erase the prints for the next morning.

I’ve definitely in the past, w/ Elvis (2022), explored living w/in that world for 3 yrs and that being the only thing that I think about day and night. With Feyd, I knew that that would be unhealthy for my family and friends… So I made a conscious decision to have a boundary. It allowed for more freedom between action and cut b/c I knew I was going to protect everybody else outside of the context of what we were doing. That’s not to say that it doesn’t bleed into your life. But I knew that I wasn’t going to do anything dangerous outside of that boundary, and in a way that allowed me to go deeper. -Austin Butler

When the camera was on, it was like you were possessed. When the camera was off, you were still maybe 25 or 30% Feyd. Just enough to still be present and focus but removed enough that you didn’t kill anybody on set. -Denis Villeneuve

There are several new characters to meet; perhaps the most interesting is Feyd-Rautha (Austin Butler), the young nephew to Baron Harkkonen (Stellan Skaarsgard). Butler put on 25 lbs. (on his typically slim/6′ frame) to play a warrior w/ a lust for blood. He has a liaison w/ the cool/calculating Lady Margot Fenring (Lea Seydoux); this was planned by Bene Gesserit- Mother Mohiam (Charlotte Rampling). In one scene, Feyd-Rautha kisses his uncle (as a show of loyalty); this was improvised by Butler! Beast Rabban (Dave Bautista) is jealous of his cousin; they have an antagonistic relationship. Fraser suggested the idea to shoot the scenes in Giedi Prime (the Harkonnen planet) w/ infrared cameras to give the skin a translucent texture. Feyd-Rautha’s flight is seen in B&W, induced by a black sun that Giedi Prime orbits around.

Some were surprised to see that Princess Irulan (Florence Pugh) didn’t have a meaty role; we’ll see much more of her in the 3rd installment. As I’ve noted before, I’m a fan of Pugh; she has a quiet (internal) role here. The Emperor (and Irulan’s father) is played by stage/screen veteran Christopher Walken; some viewers thought that he wasn’t quite right for this part. Many were surprised to see Anya Taylor Joy on the red carpet during the premiere; she wore a gauzy white gown w/ a head covering. She she has a short (yet pivotal) cameo; more will be done w/ her character (Alia) in the future.

Paul is more of a “gray” character (anti-hero); maybe y’all book readers already knew this. The scene where he rides the huge sandworm was pretty cool! Instead of heeding Chani’s warning, Paul drinks “the water of life.” This desert mouse can roar (for sure), and isn’t as humble as he pretended, as we see in the last act. Of course, I was a BIT shocked when Paul chose the princess for marriage (a stranger, yet politically advantageous) over Chani (who doesn’t believe in the prophecy, seeing him just as a man)!

“Dune” (1984) starring Kyle MacLachlan, Francesca Annis, Patrick Stewart, Sean Young, Sting, & Dean Stockwell

A world beyond your experience, beyond your imagination. -Tagline

A Duke’s son leads desert warriors against the galactic emperor and his father’s evil nemesis to free their desert world from the emperor’s rule. -Synopsis

I know what some of you MAY be thinking: Can I watch this movie sober? LOL… I sure did! It was an unique experience- to keep it brief/spoiler free. I’m NOT a fan of director David Lynch’s style, BUT I decided to give this a look (since a LOT of ppl were discussing Frank Herbert’s sci-fi universe in 2023). Though Paul Atreides is supposed to be an older teen, Kyle MacLachlan (looking good- no doubt) is a grown-ass man (at age 25)! Yup, back in the ’80s, aging was different (I was there). Lady Jessica is played by Francesca Annis (who was NOT yet 40); she’s a tall/elegant/theatrically-trained British actress. The other two women in the movie (Virginia Madsen and Sean Young) get V little character development. I got a big kick out of seeing (another theater actor) Patrick Stewart before ST: TNG fame; he plays the experienced warrior/mentor to Paul, Gurney Halleck. Dean Stockwell (best known to my gen for Quantum Leap and BSG) plays Dr. Yueh, a man w/ a tragic past who has a big secret. Sting (the rock star- in a bit of stunt casting) plays gleeful/young warrior/villain Feyd Rautha; he appears shirtless (or wearing V tight costumes), though his role is small.

Paul: I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will let it pass over me and through me. And when it has passed I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where it has gone, there will be nothing. Only I will remain.

In today’s media landscape, this would’ve become a limited series on streaming w/ high production values, instead of SO much plot/many characters packed into 2 hrs. 17 mins. Some of you may’ve seen the Sci-Fi channel miniseries from 2001- Dune and Children of Dune (where I 1st saw Scottish actor James McAvoy). Yup, this was a few yrs before McAvoy won the 1st BAFTA Rising Star award (2006). Lynch’s vision strongly clashed w/ what the studio had in mind, which is NOT hard to imagine. As one viewer (who saw the 3 hr. version on TV) noted: “It seems more a DeLaurentis film than a Lynch film.” The Young’uns may be put off by a repetitive soundtrack and heavy use of voice-over. Some of the acting (esp. by the villains) is laughably over-the-top. Many viewers appreciated the costumes, sets, and visual effects (which are a different category from SFX).