Tag: Marraige

“Juror #2” (2024) starring Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, J.K. Simmons, Kiefer Sutherland, & Zoey Deutch

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Juror #2 (streaming on HBO MAX).

While serving as a juror in a high-profile murder trial, a family man finds himself struggling with a serious moral dilemma, one he could use to sway the jury verdict and potentially convict or free the wrong killer. -Synopsis

In Savannah, GA, Justin Kemp (British up-and-coming actor Nicholas Hoult) is a writer at a lifestyle mag who is called in for jury duty. He tries to get out of it, explaining to the judge (Amy Aquino) that his wife- Allison (Zoey Deutch)- is in the 3rd trimester of her pregnancy. The judge isn’t moved, noting that this won’t take more time than his (9-5) job. The case is the murder of a young woman, Kendall Carter (Francesca Eastwood); the defendant is her on-again/off again bf- James Sythe (Gabriel Basso). The prosecutor, Faith Killebrew (Toni Colette), is running to be DA; she’s V confident that this will be an open and shut case. She has a (friendly) rivalry w/ the defense attorney, Eric Resnick (Chris Messina). In flashbacks, we see that Justin- on the (stormy) night that Kendall died- hit something w/ his car!

Are y’all feeling nostalgic for those 1990s (EX: John Grisham) legal dramas? Then, this is (new-ish) movie (from Clint Eastwood- still working) is for you. I have to admit, the premise looked interesting, so I checked it out over the recent holiday break (on HBO MAX). Also, many critics/viewers have commented that (mid-budget) dramas like this for a grown-up audience are lacking from theaters in recent yrs. Don’t look for any big thrills or even much tension. This is a case of missed opportunities (directing choices) and lackluster dialogue (basic screenwriting). Even the musical score is nothing memorable.

This movie is also a reunion btwn. Hoult and his (onscreen) About a Boy (2002) mom- Collette. The actors are doing the best they can w/ the material; however, Collette’s Southern accent is a BIT uneven. The jury is V diverse (reflecting a mid-sized city in the modern era), BUT there is V little character development. Small roles are played by Kiefer Sutherland and J. K. Simmons; I guess LOT of actors want to work w/ Eastwood. You may’ve heard that there is an unexpected ending, BUT that can’t save the film.

[1] For one, the case itself seemed pretty weak to begin with. It was mostly circumstantial and no direct evidence linking the defendant to the crime.

[2] This cast is doing their best, but the material is so incredibly dumb. The elevator pitch of the plot is intriguing, but it’s got the silly execution of a CBS crime procedural.

I watched it for the cast, and for the moral dilemma and mystery of the premise, but the trailer had more actual plot clarity than the movie itself.

[3] I was surprised how 2D some of the characters on the jury were, and pretty simplistic and dated stereotypes.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Noir City DC 2024

EmmaLeave a comment

Introduction

Hey y’all, how is this Winter going (so far)? It’s NOT fun for me; I’m recovering from a bad cough/cold (after Thanksgiving). I’m also way behind on blog posts. As DC area noir-istas know, my local (AFI) theater had a festival in OCT; Eddie Muller (TCM) came to introduce the movies during the opening wknd. This yr, the festival had double features (2 movies) which revolved around the same themes; 5 out of the 6 noirs I saw were new to me.

Thanks for reading!

-EMMA

***

Union Station (1950) starring William Holden, Nancy Olsen, & Barry Fitzgerald

A secretary traveling from Connecticut to NYC, Joyce Willecombe (Nancy Olsen), grows suspicious of 2 men boarding her train. She is referred to Bill Calhoun (William Holden), head of the Union Station police; the no-nonsense Calhoun is initially skeptical, BUT the men (who escape) prove to be involved in a kidnapping case. Calhoun calls in his boss/mentor, Inspector Donnelly (Barry Fitzgerald), BUT the ruthless kidnappers stay one step ahead of them. Most of the action centers around busy/fast-paced Union Station.

Holden and Olson also co-starred in Sunset Boulevard in the same year- 1950. Joyce plays Calhoun’s conscience, concerned that the interests of the victim don’t get overlooked in the hunt for the criminals. This is a (lesser-known/low budget) film noir; Holden was on the cusp of stardom. This was Lyle Bettger’s 3rd film; he played a LOT of baddies in his career. The platinum-blonde/wide-eyed Jan Sterling has a small role as his (TOO loyal) gf. Fitzgerald (who always played Irish cops or priests) brings in the humor. You can find this noir on streaming services (or rent on YT).

Cairo Station (1958)

Qinawi (Youssef Chahine), a physically-challenged peddler who makes his living selling newspapers in the central Cairo train station, is obsessed w/ Hanuma (Hind Rustum), a curvy/pretty young woman who sells drinks. Hanuma treats Qinawi kindly and flirts w/ him re: a possible relationship. However, she’s already engaged to Abu Siri, a burly/macho porter struggling to unionize his fellow workers to combat their boss’ exploitative treatment. The movie has a large cast (portraying Egyptians of disparate classes) and does NOT fall easily into one genre. Some viewers commented that the climactic scenes reminded them of Hitchcock! Chahine (an Egyptian of Christian heritage) also wrote the story and served as director. If you’re familiar w/ the characterization, visual style, and themes often seen in Bollywood, you should check it out.

[1] The work sometimes recalls Jean Renoir’s “La Bete Humaine,” but with more attention to detail. […]

Let’s underline the importance of the wide screen, which makes the director look like an entomologist watching an ant hill with a magnifying glass…

[2] It’s not hard to see why “Cairo Station” was banned for 20 years in Egypt. It gained much recognition in Berlin, being nominated for the Golden Bear…

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

***

Le Samourai (1967)

In Paris, Jef Costello (Alain Delon) is a solitary hit man who works under contract. He’s hired to kill the owner of a club, and soon becomes the prime suspect of that murder. His gf (Jane), one of her clients (Wiener), and the Black singer of the club (Valerie) are questioned by the police. Jef is chased by henchmen (sent by the same man who hired him) and by cops. He seeks out who has hired him to get revenge. There is NOT much of a plot, characters have little development, and there isn’t much dialogue. I heard of this film yrs. ago, BUT this was my 1st time seeing it. As Gen Z may say, this movie is “all about vibes.” Sorry IF you’re a fan of thing kind of stuff, BUT I didn’t connect w/ it.

This Gun for Hire (1942)

Hit man Philip Raven (Alan Ladd), is kind to kids and feeds stray cats. He kills a blackmailer and is paid off by Willard Gates (Laird Cregar) in “hot” (marked) money. Meanwhile, a young/blonde entertainer, Ellen Graham (Veronica Lake), gf of police Lt. Michael Crane (Robert Preston) is enlisted by a Senator to help investigate Gates. Raven, while seeking Gates, meets Ellen on a train. Their relationship gradually evolves from that of killer and (potential) victim to an uneasy alliance against a common enemy. This is a well-known/low budget noir which I’ve seen before (on the small screen); it’s a quick/well-paced watch.

***

They Made Me a Fugitive (1947)

In this British noir (from Brazilian director Alberto Cavalcanti), a frustrated/cynical former RAF pilot, Clem Morgan (Trevor Howard), joins a criminal gang led by a nasty character nicknamed Narcy (Griffith Jones). On his 1st break-in job, the getaway car crashes and ends up killing a cop. Quickly, Clem is framed as the driver and sent to jail. Seeking revenge, he escapes prison and heads for London. Along the way, he breaks into a suburban home; a housewife named Mrs. Fenshaw (Veda Hope) helps him out, then asks him to murder her husband. Upon reaching London, Clem is sheltered by a blonde/petite dancer named Sally Connor (Sally Gray), who falls for him. He confronts Narcy and the gang in an abandoned warehouse.

[1] There is more attention to sound and camera-work than I’ve noticed in most British movies from the end of the war until about 1956 or so. Warner Brothers gets a huge credit at the start… So, it’s British, but it has American and continental style. […]

It’s scarier than the American gangster movies of the late forties.

[2] The general gloominess (a mainstay of thrillers emanating from the post-war era) is leavened somewhat by its constant flurry of hard-boiled dialogue courtesy of screenwriter Noel Langley. […]

Still, perhaps my favorite scene in the entire film is Howard’s surreal encounter with the zombie-like Vida Hope – in whose household he stumbles while on the run; she turns out to be deranged, and even tries to talk our hero into murdering her alcoholic husband (Maurice Denham)!

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Aimless Bullet (1961)

A couple of yrs. after the war in Seoul, a 30-something accountant’s salary is TOO small for him to even get his cavity fixed. He must somehow provide for his PTSD-affected mother, his pregnant wife, a younger brother (who can’t get work after serving in the army), a younger sister (who sneaks out at night to sell herself to American GIs), and 2 young children. This movie was banned in Korea b/c it was so realistically stark in it’s post- war depiction. You could tell that the locations were real; we see urban offices, outdoor cafes (for tea and drinking away sorrows), slums (located on the hilly areas near the city). The character development was V good, though the pacing felt a bit slow at times.

This film is depressing and it drives slowly towards its conclusion. On the other hand, compared to the often over-the-top melodrama present in other films I’ve seen from the era, Obaltan is a stark contrast. Owing more to Italian Neorealism than Hollywood, the film has many moments of mundaneness and potentially existentialist commentary. That Obaltan means “the aimless bullet” should give that away from the start.

-Excerpt from IMDb review

“Hold on to Me Darling” at The Lucille Lortel Theatre (NYC): OCT 16th-DEC 22nd

EmmaLeave a comment

On learning of his mother’s death, country music icon Strings McCrane (Adam Driver) finds himself in an existential tailspin. The only way out, he decides, is to abandon superstardom in favor of the simple life, so he moves back to his hometown in Tennessee. The simple life turns out to be anything but simple in this brilliantly observed tragicomedy, as the consequences of Strings’ success and mind-bending effects of his fame prove all but impossible to outrun. -Synopsis

Hey y’all, I had a FAB wknd in NYC!!! On SAT night, I saw Adam Driver (my current fave actor, as regular readers know) in the play Hold on to Me Darling (written by Kenneth Lonergan)! The play has a limited engagement at The Lucille Lortel Theatre (West Village) until DEC 22nd; I set a reminder, got in the (online) queue, and (luckily) got my ticket in early AUG. In the past, Timothy Olyphant (Deadwood; Justified) played the lead role of country singer/actor Strings McCrane. Twitter was abuzz (earlier this Fall) after seeing a few photos of Olyphant in the role (incl. ones where he is wearing black boxers and socks). OMG, how was Adam going to look (some of us wondered)!? And more importantly, how were we super-fans (AKA rats) going to handle seeing him in-person!?

Let’s get the important stuff out of the way: Adam really is that tall (so towers over the supporting cast) and looks as (uniquely) gorgeous as in photos/movies. His hair is V dark/ thick; he is BOTH wide (note the shoulders) and slim (see waistline). Early in the 1st act, Strings strips down to his boxers and socks before getting a massage from Nancy (Heather Burns). Yup, Adam still has 6-pack abs! As the stage is small, he looms large as a (physical) presence and w/ (deep/baritone) voice. Strings has a Southern accent; fans/viewers from the region commented (online) that Adam did a good job w/ it. He plays the guitar, but Strings is TOO upset to sing much.

The story involves grief, regret, unresolved family issues, a love triangle, and the toxicity of fame (incl. loss of privacy and disconnection from everyday ppl). This play is V well-suited to Adam, as he shows his range; Strings goes from loud/domineering to more quiet/vulnerable (w/o missing a beat). Strings can be charming, yet also self-centered (after being a celeb so long). Adam is in every scene of the 2 act play, aside from one, in the 2 hr. 45 mins. play (which I thought was a BIT too long). Strings wants to regain closeness w/ his older brother, Duke (C.J. Wilson), a working-class family man who still lives in their hometown. He is reunited w/ his 2nd cousin twice removed, Essie (Adelaide Clemens), at his mother’s funeral; this actress has a strong resemblance to Michelle Williams. Essie was a close friend to this mom in recent yrs, so feels her loss deeply.

There are meta moments, such as Strings complaining to his assistant Jimmy (Keith Nobbs) re: “this goddamn space movie” he needs to shoot soon in Kansas City. When Rian Johnson (director of Star Wars: The Last Jedi) saw the play in previews, he laughed out loud at that line. There are many funny lines; I didn’t expect to laugh so much! Nancy compares Strings to a “sad, dark prince” (a la Kylo Ren); a viewer who saw the (previous) play wrote: “Lonergan changed a few lines to fit Adam.” In the final scene, we meet a (hitherto unseen) character named Mitch (Frank Wood); he and Strings have an emotional/powerful conversation (which made me a BIT teary). If you want to see more (incl. 2 vids I took at the stage door), then go to my Twitter/X account (knightleyemma)!

Links to Reviews:

Deadline

The Guardian

Vogue

Vulture

“The Best Years of Our Lives” (1946) starring Myrna Loy, Dana Andrews, Frederic March, Teresa Wright, Virginia Mayo, Cathy O’Donnell & Harold Russell

Emma1 Comment

Filled with all the love and warmth and joy. . .the human heart can hold! -A tagline for the film

This iconic movie (helmed by one of Hollywood’s famed/respected directors- William Wyler) centers on the re-adjustment of 3 Americans to everyday life after serving nearly 3 yrs. in WWII. Each man is from a separate age group, rank, and class, BUT quickly become close friends. Each faces a crisis which is a microcosm of the experiences of many IRL American veterans. Al Stephenson (Frederic March: 46 y.o.) returns to his wife Milly (Myrna Loy) and 2 kids: Peggy (Teresa Wright)- a nurse- and Rob- a HS student. Wyler modeled the reunion scene on his own homecoming to his wife. As a banker, Al finds it hard to reconcile his loyalties to ex-servicemen w/ doing “business as usual.” Fred Derry (Dana Andrews: 36 y.o.)- from the working class- finds it difficult to find a job, though he was decorated for heroism as a pilot. Fred can’t relate to the woman he hastily married, Marie (Virginia Mayo), before shipping out. Having lost both hands in a training accident, Homer Parrish (Harold Russell: a non-professional actor/amputee) is unsure IF his fiancee, Wilma (Cathy O’Donnell) will still love (or pity) him. This couple grew up next door to each other, yet find it hard to communicate now.

Rob: We’ve been having lectures in atomic energy at school, and Mr. McLaughlin, he’s our physics teacher, he says that we’ve reached a point where the whole human race has either got to find a way to live together, or else uhm…
Al: [with grim finality] Or else.

Wyler (a major in the Army Air Force), incorporated his own experiences into the film. He flew in B-17s in combat over Germany; later, he shot footage for documentary films. His hearing was permanently damaged when an anti-aircraft shell exploded near his plane while on a bombing raid. Wyler (often noted as “an actor’s director”) sat beneath the camera w/ a large set of headphones connected to an amplifier. The story grew out of a Time (July 1944) story re: Marines taking a train back home to New York from San Diego, and growing more quiet/nervous the closer they got. The screenplay was written by Stewart E. Sherwood (Rebecca; The Bishop’s Wife) and MacKinlay Kantor (Gun Crazy). Wyler wanted an unglamorous look; costumes came off the rack and were worn by the cast before filming and sets were built smaller than life-size. Wyler modeled (fictional) Boone City after Cincinnati; as seen by such things as the taco stand, filming was obviously in SoCal. The add further to the authenticity, the crew (props, grips, mixers, etc.) were recruited from WWII veterans.

The Best Years of Our Lives? More like the best movie of our lives! -Comment by podcaster/movie critic

Loy has top billing here, b/c she was the most famous among the cast at that time. This was a breakout role for Andrews; he gets to show his range (esp. in the last act). In one argument, Mayo (who lobbied hard for her role) bitterly comments: “I gave up the best years of my life, and what have you done?” Each actor does well, whether their role is big or just in one scene. This is one of the Oscar winners which is truly a classic you can’t miss! It’s a slice of life from the ’40s that is still relatable; you can see it w/ all ages. I was emotional watching this film, esp. in the scene btwn Homer and Wilma while he’s getting ready for bed (revealing his vulnerability). This is streaming for free, so check it out for yourself.

[1] The film epitomized both the dream and the reality of the post-war world. This intimate engagement with the psychological facts of American life gave it an almost universal audience. But, unlike contemporary and preceding “message” pictures, it was not a preachment. It showed Americans as they are, presented their problems as they themselves see them, and provided only such solutions, partial, temporary, personal, as they themselves would accept. The picture’s values are the values of the people in it.

[2] To me, watching this movie is like opening up a time capsule. I think in many ways “The Best Years of Our Lives” is probably one of the more fascinating character studies and it holds up extremely well as a look at life in the US in the mid-1940s after WWII. […]

This movie still packs a wallop and I’m very happy to read in other posts other users feeling of a movie that will definitely stand the test of time.

[3]“Best Years” has an unbelievable number of scenes that bring a tear to the eye or a lump to the throat, with only a couple of those being the result of sadness, and with most being caused by beautiful depictions of love, loyalty, pride, patriotism, or the overcoming of personal adversity.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Frantic” (1988) starring Harrison Ford, Betty Buckley, & Emmanuelle Seignier

EmmaLeave a comment

In a hotel room in Paris, a doctor comes out of the shower and finds that his wife has disappeared. He soon finds himself caught up in a world of intrigue, espionage, gangsters, drugs and murder. -Synopsis

Are y’all fans of (iconic/American) actor Harrison Ford? I’m sure a LOT of you are, esp. IF growing up in the late ’70s to early ’90s. I learned re: this (lesser-known) film of Ford’s from a past ep of the Screen Drafts podcast. An American/middle-aged surgeon, Dr. Richard Walker (Ford) goes to Paris for a medical conference w/ his wife of many yrs, Sondra (Betty Buckley). They can’t open one of their bags, as Sondra picked up the wrong suitcase at the airport. While her husband is in the shower, Sondra gets a call; then (when he gets out) she has disappeared! Richard begins a search for his wife, though he speaks no French, and has V little to go on for clues. Along the way, Richard has to deal w/ the local police, the U.S. Embassy, and a beautiful/exciting young woman hustling to make money, Michelle (Emmanuelle Seignier- just 21 y.o. at the time of filming). This was Seignier’s 1st movie; she has been married to the director (Roman Polanski) since 1989.

Hotel Detective Le Grand Hotel: Have you and your wife been to Paris before?

Richard Walker: Yes, on our honeymoon.

Hotel Detective Le Grand Hotel: Is it possible she met someone here? Someone she has been thinking about?

Richard Walker: Since June 15th, 1968?

The original ending was shown to a small test audience and subsequently changed to the (happy) one in the final cut. Some audience members reported that Sondra was a spy in the original ending! The studio made Polanski cut the run time, too. Now, this is NOT a great movie (crime drama/mystery/thriller), yet it’s tense and will keep the audience entertained. Aside from a few scenes, I thought the film was well-paced. Some viewers compared it to Hitchcock, BUT transported to Paris in the ’80s. Ford carries the movie V well; this is a role that calls for a protagonist who is relatable, trustworthy, and capable. As an added bonus, Ford is looking esp. fit (and the French don’t shy away from showing that)!

[1] Polanski tells us the story with great suspense involving the city of Paris like a character of the film. All movie spends time on the Parisian places and rooftops. The music of Ennio Morricone also is a great element of the film success that gives us a great mood. The characters as Harrison Ford and Emmanuel Seignier are superb in their roles too. I think a must see movie if you love great oeuvres of Hitchcock and you love Paris.

[2] The cast are good but it is Ford’s film and he leads it really well. He convinces as the man becoming increasingly “frantic” and he manages to involve humour as his character becomes savvier about what is happening and also appears to be seedier and less professional as a result!

[3] The film would truly live up to a degree of tension if his interactions with Parisians were realistic. They all seem willing to help, none of them annoyed by an American archetype anxiously babbling English at them in their native country. I’ve heard many stories from friends and writers who’ve been to Paris. They do not bless Paris with a reputation for being nice and accommodating to English-speaking Americans. One friend told me that he was not allowed to have his passport back unless he asked for it in French. Another told me that when he tried to order a meal at a restaurant in English, the clerk slammed her hand on the table and ordered that he speak French. My own experience in Paris might be vastly different, and it is no doubt a beautiful and culturally rich city, but there would inevitably be at least a blemish of resistance against Ford’s conventionally American character.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews