Tag: Murder

“Black Widow” (1987) starring Debra Winger & Theresa Russell

EmmaLeave a comment

She mates and she kills. No man can resist her. Only one woman can stop her. -Tagline

A tall/blonde/early 30s woman, Catharine Petersen (Theresa Russell), marries older (50-something) millionaires, waits until they’ve changed their wills (to leave all of their money to her), and murders them using clever methods. With each relationship, Catharine changes her appearance (hair/makeup/clothes) and personality to suit the man. Alexandra Barnes (Debra Winger) is a DOJ data analyst who finds links btwn several mysterious deaths. The more she learns of this woman, the more Alex becomes fascinated; she does field work on her own time (her co-workers and supervisor are V skeptical). Taking a wild chance, Alex flies to Hawaii to track the “black widow” (on her own)!

This (lesser known) neo noir was released about 6 mos. prior to the hit Fatal Attraction (1987). The director (Bob Rafelson) hadn’t worked on a movie since The Postman Always Rings Twice (1981); I’m NOT a fan of that remake (see the original B&W ver. instead). This movie could be a BIT shorter; there are also odd editing choices (some critics called it “choppy”). The dialogue is pretty good; the screenplay is by Ron Bass (Rain Man; My Best Friend’s Wedding). Winger (who had prior success w/ An Officer and a Gentleman and Terms of Endearment) was given the choice of the 2 co-leads; she chose Alex, b/c she didn’t understand why Catharine kills. One of the men in the poker game is David Mamet (in his 1st film); he’s best known as a director. Dennis Hopper has a small role (5 mins.) in the 1st act. We also see theater/movie veterans (Lois Smith and James Hong) in supporting roles.

Black Widow gives us a look into the (pre-internet) world of investigations; there was no facial recognition tech yet. Alex uses a slide projector to examine newspaper photos. Catharine borrows a VCR player (which is quite large) from the fancy Seattle hotel where she’s staying to watch a videotape. (I don’t think my family had a VCR then; we’d immigrated to the US in the Fall of 1986.) There is a LOT that is unsaid; there is “erotic tension” (as one astute reviewer said) btwn. the two women. Does Alex envy Catharine (who can get any man she wants)? Are the women attracted to each other? Early in the story, Alex shut down advances (gently) from her “right hand” (D.W. Moffett); there is also concern from her boss (Terry O’Quinn) who tells her (explicitly) to get a man. As Roger Ebert (who didn’t recommend it) said: “The acting is good. I expected more from this movie.” Gene Siskel liked it a LOT; he said: “Alex realized that Catharine could do something that she couldn’t- love!”

“Black Widow” (1954) starring Ginger Rogers, Van Heflin, Gene Tierney, & George Raft

Emma1 Comment

At a cocktail party thrown by nabes, a married Broadway writer/producer, Peter Denver (Van Heflin), meets a 20 y.o. young woman, Nancy “Nanny” Ordway (Peggy Ann Gardiner), an aspiring writer. He tells his actress/wife, Iris (Gene Tierney- in a small role), about this new acquaintance; she’s out of town helping her ailing mom. Peter decides to take her under his wing, giving her advice, and a bright place to write (his apt). A few weeks later, Nanny is found dead in his apt! At first thought to be a suicide, it is later discovered that she was murdered; suspicion falls on Peter. He begins his own investigation in order to clear his name; he discovers that Nanny wasn’t as naive/innocent as she appeared to be. The lead cop on the case, Lt. Bruce, is played by George Raft (in his gray-haired/character actor era). Classic film fans may know him from his leading roles (’30s-’40s).

Peter’s nabe/friend, Brian Mullen (Reginald Gardiner), started an affair w/ Nanny (who became pregnant) b/c she made him feel appreciated. This happened weeks before she met Peter. Brian (who has no current job) is married to a successful/glam Bdwy actress, Carlotta “Lottie” Marin (Ginger Rogers). From the early scenes, we see that Lottie is “the one that wears the pants” (and has a strong personality). Rogers uses a haughty/theatrical voice in her role; she wears several stylish outfits. Though Brian acts humble/self-deprecating in public re: being “a nobody,” Nanny realizes that it bothers him to be perceived of as less than his wife.

This is a movie that made me wonder: Are men doing OK? It seems that (even today), some men have a prob when gfs/wives make more money and/or have more power/influence than themselves. Actress Keke Palmer’s bf (w/ whom she had a baby recently) called her out (on Twitter) re: her outfit at an Usher concert. I don’t know what (IF anything) he does for a living; I’m guessing that Palmer is the breadwinner. Sarah Brady, a pro surfer/ex-gf of Jonah Hill, released texts (on IG) where the actor was trying to counsel her re: clothing and friendships when they were a couple. Were these actions (taken by Palmer’s bf and Hill’s ex) on social media in good taste? No, BUT they do reveal the insecurity some men feel when they can’t control the women in their lives. So why NOT pursue women who have more “regular” jobs or those who choose to dress “conservative?” Well, that wouldn’t be a challenge to men w/ this mindset! They want to tear down women that society puts above them (when it comes to money, status, looks, etc.)

“The Dark Corner” (1946) starring Lucille Ball, Clifton Webb, William Bendix, & Mark Stevens

Emma1 Comment

Kathleen Stewart [to Bradford Galt]: I don’t play for score, I play for keeps.

PI Bradford Galt (Mark Stevens) has moved to NYC from San Fran after serving a jail term (manslaughter) on account of a barrister/former business partner, Tony Jardine (Kurt Kreuger- an Austrian actor). When Galt sees a white suited man (William Bendix) tailing him, Galt believes Jardine is behind it. As he discovers more, Galt is V glad to have his loyal secretary/love interest, Kathleen Stewart (Lucille Ball), around for support. You can watch this movie for free on YouTube.

Kathleen: I’ve never been followed before.

Galt: That’s a terrible reflection on American manhood.

I think Mark Stevens was the only man my dad was jealous of. [The audience laughs.] Hey, they [the actor and her mother, Lucille Ball] had some good love scenes! -Luci Arnaz, at a pre-screening talk hosted by TCM

At the time this film was made, Lucy was suing to get out of her contract w/ MGM; they loaned her to Fox (where she had to take a big pay cut). In later years, Lucy said she hated the experience of shooting The Dark Corner. She resented director Henry Hathaway, whose bullying reduced her to stuttering (he then accused her of being drunk)! As Eddie Muller (TCM) commented: “Hathaway was NOT known for being a woman’s director.” Hmmm… some guys just can’t deal w/ strong gals!

Hardy Cathcart: Lovers of beauty never haggle over price, Tony.

This is a tightly edited/efficient B-picture that is fun to watch (even if you aren’t a noir-ista)! The snappy dialogue incl. some fun/memorable lines. This is considered to be the best of Lucy’s roles; she has top billing. Another great ensemble film that I enjoyed w/ her is Stage Door. Lucy’s character here is smart, loyal, and brave. Lucy can do it all; she went on to her (iconic) TV show and producing Star Trek. Stevens (on the other hand) only made a few small movies in his brief career. The art gallery owner, Hardy Cathcart (Clifton Webb), is V similar to the character of Waldo Lydecker (also played by Webb) in the hit noir Laura (1944).

Re-Watch: “Jagged Edge” (1985) starring Jeff Bridges, Glenn Close, Peter Coyote, & Robert Loggia

Emma1 Comment

When a murder case is this shocking, which do you trust… your emotions or the evidence? -Tagline

Jack: You still think I’m guilty? How can you defend me if you think I’m guilty?

Teddy: It happens all the time. It’s the way our legal system works.

San Fran publishing heiress, Page Forrester, is brutally murdered in her luxurious beach house. Her husband, Jack (Jeff Bridges), seems devastated by the crime; he is soon accused of her murder. He hires Teddy Barnes (Glenn Close) to defend him, despite the fact she hasn’t handled a criminal defense case in several years. There’s chemistry between them; the lawyer soon finds herself falling hard for her client.

The movie is about layers and layers and layers of truth. It’s like peeling an onion down to the core. Here we have a very intelligent, very attractive, very warm, very modern mother/career woman who has made a definite commitment to a moral standard, and makes one more moral stand when she says that she will only defend the man who is accused of a terrible crime, if she is convinced of his innocence. The rollercoaster begins. Is he innocent? Is he guilty? Is he lying? Or is he not? It’s a classic high-tension psychological thriller. -Richard Marquand, director (when asked re: the movie during promo)

This movie is the 1st of screenwriter Joe Eszterhas’ San Fran thriller trilogy; the later films are Basic Instinct (1992) and Jade (1995). Eszterhas originally titled the screenplay Hearts of Fire. Columbia disliked the title and decided it had to be changed; they assigned a secretary to go through the script. She came upon “jagged edge” (in description of the murder weapon: “a knife with a jagged edge”). Kevin Costner turned down the role of Jack (thank goodness)! Jane Fonda was originally attached to play Teddy. When she demanded that changes be made to the script, the studio sided w/ Eszterhas and replaced her w/ Close. Fonda and Bridges co-starred in another thriller- The Morning After (1986)- directed by Sydney Lumet.

Who did it? Tom Krasny, the district attorney with political aspirations, is quick to make a case against Forrester. But there is reason to believe that Krasny is as eager to ride this case into a senate seat as he is to convict the right man. Teddy is sharp. She launches her own investigation with the help of a crusty gumshoe named Sam Ransom. She finds what she is looking for: the holes in Krasny’s case and the fact that Forrester is not the only suspect. But she also finds something she wasn’t looking for: emotional and romantic involvement with her client. -Martin Ransohoff, producer

Martin Ransohoff (who went on to produce the movie) took the story idea to Columbia president (Guy McElwaine) in 1983; McElwaine was interested in a courtroom piece (an intense story that’d raise some pressing Qs about the legal system). According to Eszterhas’ book Hollywood Animal, Ransohoff was against the casting of Glenn Close (saying she was “too ugly” for the part). Close heard about this; she said she didn’t want Ransohoff on set during her scenes. The director (Richard Marquand- best known for Star Wars: Episode VI – The Return of the Jedi) supported Close and sent Ransohoff away. The producer was so mad that he went to studio heads trying to get them both fired! The studio later denied this happened (of course). Teddy has 2 young kids (David and Jenny); in their bedroom is a poster of The Return of the Jedi.

This tension between Krasny and Forrester is intense. There is history between them. The courtroom begins to take on the feeling of the O.K. Corral. -Jeff Bridges, actor

This is one of the earliest movies of the erotic thriller genre (and it’s quite effective). Now, there are some problematic elements (esp. when viewed through modern eyes). The acting is quite strong; Robert Loggia received a Best Supporting Oscar nom! Loggia plays Sam Ransom (former investigator in the DA’s office/Teddy’s trusted friend) who curses, drinks (a LOT), and looks rumpled. Teddy and Sam still regret what occurred on one of their past cases. At first, you may wonder if the DA (Teddy’s former boss), Thomas Krasny (Peter Coyote), will be the lead; he’s the focus of the opening 10 mins. To lend to the authenticity, the exteriors of the courtroom were San Fran’s City Hall.

Teddy: Sam! He didn’t do it!

Sam: Yeah? Is that your head talking, or another part of your anatomy? [Teddy gives him a sour look]

Sam: Hey, ok, what the hell, f**k me! [runs for the door]

Today’s viewers may NOT 100% buy into Teddy getting into a relationship w/ Jack; this is crucial for the plot. Teddy is recently divorced; her (nice/bland) ex-hubby doesn’t get much screen time (though the kids want their parents together). She desperately wants to believe that this client is innocent, BUT there are doubts. Here we have the (common) trope of the professional woman who makes a mess of her personal life. She leads w/ her heart, NOT her head. It doesn’t seem like Jack would be ready for romance after the recent tragedy. Jack works his charm on Teddy (w/o her suspecting); he takes her horseback riding, they walk on the beach, and have wine w/ takeout. Jeans, cozy sweaters, business suits- y’all know Bridges looks FAB in all the outfits. Close and Bridges are V well-matched; they create good chemistry together. In the tense/revelatory courtroom scenes, they convey much w/o dialogue.

[1] Bridges and Close show why they’re among the greatest stars of their generation. I can pretty much guarantee that you won’t find this movie boring. 

[2] This courtroom thriller was one of the films that spawned a huge wave of copycats through the mid ’80’s and early ’90’s. […]

…the film works very well on a visceral level, providing twists and shocks along the way (including one startling break-in near the end which is jarring no matter how many times it is seen.) The film’s greatest strength is the acting, notably Close. […] She brings great conviction to her poorly conceived role. Bridges does well also as the perfectly moussed, tan dreamboat who might be a savage murderer. Loggia brings a welcome salty edge to the film with his foul-mouthed portrayal of Close’s investigator friend.

The discordant music by Barry is very unsettling and his use of low piano keys doubtlessly inspired Jerry Goldsmith for “Basic Instinct.” It’s the same type of sound. Folks expecting a watertight story will be disappointed. Those who just want to be entertained and spooked should love it.

[3] The ending was cause for much discussion back in the day, and viewing it now it still feels like a moment of cheek mixed in with some form of clarity, but rest assured it works well, as does, funnily enough, the whole film. No world beater here, but highly accomplished and worth the time of any thriller obsessed movie fan. 

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Park Chan-wook’s 1st American Movie: “Stoker” (2013) starring Mia Wasikowska, Nicole Kidman, & Matthew Goode

Emma1 Comment

India Stoker (Mia Wasikowska) was not prepared to lose her father and best friend, Richard (Dermot Mulroney), in a tragic auto accident. The solitude of her woodsy family estate, the peace of her tranquil town, and the unspoken somberness of her home life are suddenly upended by not only this mysterious accident, but by the sudden arrival of her Uncle Charlie (Matthew Goode), who she never knew existed. When Charlie moves in with her and her emotionally unstable mother Evie (Nicole Kidman), India thinks the void left by her father’s death is finally being filled by his closest bloodline. Soon after his arrival, India comes to suspect that this mysterious, charming man has ulterior motives. Yet instead of feeling outrage or horror, this friendless young woman becomes increasingly infatuated with him.

-Synopsis (Fox Searchlight Pictures)

India: You look like my father.

Charles: I am so sorry.

India: It’s your loss, too.

This is probably a film that most of you haven’t heard of before; I learned about it from the Fatal Attractions pod (which focuses on the erotic thriller genre). This is the 1st American movie helmed by South Korean director Park Chan-wook. The screenwriter is also a man of color, Wentworth Miller (best-known as the star of Prison Break); he graduated from Princeton w/ a degree in English Lit. Stoker is inspired by Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt (1943); there is a mysterious uncle who re-emerges into the life of a family after many yrs. of absence. It soon becomes obvious that this man could be dangerous.

India: He [her father] used to say, sometimes you need to do something bad to stop you from doing something worse.

This film (w/ a run time of 1 hr. 39 mins.) is a character-driven thriller which is moody, atmospheric, and tense (though NOT in an obvious way). The pacing may seem slow to some viewers, as it takes some time for the plot to get moving. The main location is an elegant/historic estate in Nashville, TN. Though they play Americans, Wasikowska and Kidman are Aussies and Goode is a Brit. Two of India’s classmates (Alden Ehrenreich and Lucas Till) would go on to their own movies and TV shows in a few yrs.

Mia’s posture: her stillness and her straightness speaks to the personality of a character who likes everything ordered around her. -Park Chan-wook, director

We know that life as a teen can be V tough, esp. when you don’t fit in w/ your family and/or peers. Evie laments the fact that she and India don’t have a close relationship; India was more of a “daddy’s girl” (we see them hunting/bonding in flashback). India is an outcast at her HS; she wears a sullen expression, doesn’t speak much, and dislikes being touched. After school, a few of the boys bully her w/ insults (yikes), though there is one boy who is sympathetic. India plays the piano, as does her Uncle Charlie; this brings them together in a (pivotal) scene. So far, I’ve seen Wasikowska in HBO’s In Treatment, Jane Eyre (2011), and Tracks (2013) co-starring Adam Driver. I think that (like Driver) she has intensity onscreen (even w/o speaking) and plays troubled/sensitive characters V well. If you’re looking for something out of the ordinary, you can rent this movie (Amazon).

[1] The look and feel of Stoker is impressive. The atmosphere is well-sustained throughout. If I had a criticism, it would simply be that the story ultimately isn’t all that original and there aren’t really a lot of surprises. What it does do though is to take a fairly standard psychological thriller story and make it interesting by way of cinematic techniques.

[2] The film has a set of amazing talents. […] The violence is a bit tamed for a Chan-wook Park film, but here, he aims more at the fortitude. He fills them with an impressively energetic style which helps executing its eeriness. The gorgeous cinematography captures the melancholia of their world. Everything is just stunning.

...the film rather tests the anxiety of the audience in these strange haunting exteriors. The film is not trying to be innovative, but the reason why it’s interesting is because of its intense use of filmmaking styles.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews