Tag: Mystery

“Anatomy of a Fall” (2023) starring Sandra Huller, Swann Arlaud, & Milo Machado Graner

Emma1 Comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Anatomy of a Fall (available to rent/buy on VOD).

A woman is suspected of her husband’s murder, and their blind son faces a moral dilemma as the main witness. -Synopsis

Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis) is found dead in the snow outside the isolated chalet (in the French Alps) where he lived w/ his wife, Sandra Voyter (Sandra Huller), and their partially-sighted 11 y.o. son Daniel (Milo Machado Graner). An investigation leads to the conclusion of “suspicious death,” as it’s impossible to know for sure whether he took his own life or was killed. Sandra’s old friend, Vincent Renzi (Swann Arlaud), is her lead defense attorney. Sandra is indicted, so we follow her trial, where her marriage is dissected. The French legal system is quite different from our own! Daniel is caught in the middle- btwn the trial and life w/ his mother.

When we started working on this film, it was like a genre film. We have so many thrillers on all the platforms and I wanted to do something different. The original idea was to have a film where there was a lack of visual elements and images, unlike films which depict a trial where there are all sorts of flashbacks and you see the life of the couple – that might have been easier – I could have shown their lives in that manner. But everything is based on absence. The child doesn’t see very well and there aren’t many images, yet you have this loud, loud music which is a focal point for the film. Whence the idea of placing the spectator in a position like the child or the jurors where there’s a lack of facts and evidence – everything is interlinked. This delirium springs from the fact that there’s so much that’s missing. -Justine Triet, director/co-writer (Cannes 2023)

Sandra [testifying in court]: Sometimes a couple is kind of a chaos and everybody is lost. Sometimes we fight together and sometimes we fight alone, and sometimes we fight against each other, that happens.

The screenplay was written by Triet (who started her career in documentaries) and her life partner, Arthur Harari. They have 2 kids together and started writing this movie in the COVID-19 pandemic (when under lockdown in Paris). This movie is a blend of domestic and legal drama- something which we (Americans) don’t often see. Triet explained that she was influenced by the Amanda Knox case, esp. how the young American woman was treated by the media. She noted that there was a LOT of misogyny in the way the press covered that case.

Sandra [to her son, Daniel]: My love. I just want you to know that I’m not that monster, you know. Everything you hear in the trial it’s just.. it’s twisted. It wasn’t like that.

Anatomy of a Fall (which is in English and French) won the Palm d’Or at Cannes. Language plays an important part here. We notice that English is the language that Samuel (a Frenchman) and Sandra (German) have in common. Daniel can speak English and French well; it’s easier for adolescents to pick up languages. At times, Sandra is at a loss for the appropriate French words in court, so she requests to speak in English (which is allowed).

The lead character is NOT always likeable and remains somewhat mysterious; some may wonder IF Sandra could be guilty. IMO- no- she was innocent (though that’s NOT the only focus of the filmmakers). In the middle of the movie, there is a flashback to a fight btwn her and Samuel. Some viewers said they were shocked by how realistic it seemed! As some of you may’ve guessed, Triet said that she was inspired by the fight btwn. the characters played by Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson in Marriage Story (2019). Sandra was more successful as a writer than her husband; Samuel earned money by teaching. Daniel (a V smart/sensitive boy) was closer to his father than his mother; his loyal dog is his constant companion.

The film moves towards this point, where it’s the child who becomes the centerpiece of the trial. What does the film talk about? It talks about a child – he carries around a very heavy weight. He’s very close to his mother, he trusts her and then there are cracks that appear and he effectively finds himself in the position of the jury; in other words having to decide whether his mother is guilty or not. We’ll never know. We’ll never know whether his testimony is true or not. I was deeply touched to see this kind of situation and it’s particularly moving as a child. I think this is the first film where I’ve really given the floor to a child. The whole of the film moves towards this point. -Triet, when asked re: the testimony of the son in the trial (Cannes 2023)

I’d heard positive buzz about this movie for several mos. before I saw it (by renting on Amazon Prime). I enjoyed it a LOT, as it subverted my expectations; IMO it’s one of the best movies of 2023! The acting is terrific, incl. by Graner and the dog (Huller’s pet IRL). Huller is garnering attention for Zone of Interest, as that film was also released in 2023. The advocat general (Antoine Reinertz) is a tough prosecutor; he has a quick wit. Some critics said that they loved to hate him! Arlaud (keeps things grounded/has charm) has the kind of (angular) face which looks different from different angles; he and Huller have great chemistry. At a recent awards event, Triet joked w/ a journo and Graner: “Doesn’t he look like a baby Adam Driver?” Such a cute moment! Check this movie out for yourself, IF you haven’t done so already.

“The Killing of a Sacred Deer”(2017) starring Collin Farrell, Nicole Kidman, & Barry Keoghan

Emma2 Comments

After the untimely death of 16 y.o. Martin’s (Barry Keoghan), father on the operating table, a bond forms btwn him and the cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Steven Murphy (Collin Farrell). Martin gets an expensive watch, then an invitation for dinner w/ the family in Stephen’s spacious/suburban home. The (humble/shy) teen quickly wins the approval of Steven’s wife/eye doctor, Anna (Nicole Kidman), and their 2 kids: 13 y.o. Kim (Raffey Cassidy) and 11 y.o. Bob (Sunny Suljic). Soon, Martin invites Stephen to come to his home and meet his widowed/lonely mother (Alicia Silverstone). Unexpectedly, the sins of the father come back to affect the entire Murphy family!

This is a modern take on a Greek myth; the movie’s title comes from the ending of the tragedy Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides. It’s a (lesser-known) Greek myth; in JHS, I got V interested in Greek mythology when we studied it in English class. Before Greek director/writer, Yorgos Lanthimos, became famous/Oscar-nominated for The Favourite (2018), he made this domestic drama/horror/mystery. Despite it’s V dark events/serious themes, much of the movie is shot on sunny days or in bright lighting. The film was shot on location in Cincinnati, Ohio (which is NOT often shown in media). Farrell starts off attempting to do a Midwestern accent, BUT then it falls off half-way through the movie. Kidman does a better job; she played a LOT of Americans in her career. Keoghan does a good job w/ the American accent; I think he slipped once. When Martin talks re: his father’s favorite film, the actor’s natural/Irish accent can be heard on the word “father.”

This is one of those films where you ask yourself: “Whoa, what did I just watch!?” It’s definitely for those looking for fun/escapist entertainment! It’s also NOT for more sensitive viewers, such as those who dislike seeing blood, violence, etc. The characters speak in a stilted manner, which is NOT quite naturalistic; their responses are often weird/unexpected (from what we’d expect in everyday society). Steven has bought into his own self-importance/power; he needs to be in control (in and out of surgery). Anna is able to stand up to Steven; she is NOT a pushover in this story. This was a “breakout” role for Keoghan (at just 24 y.o.) The actor makes himself appear younger/smaller (baggy clothes/stooping down) and takes on a (sad-eyed/down-trodden) physicality for Martin. At first, the audience feels sorry for Martin; he maybe just needs attention/guidance. Then, we start to wonder IF something is unstable about his personality. What are Martin’s true motives?

[1] Because this is such a primal story, it could be the most powerful and disturbing film of the year. The characters speak in a kind of dead tone, usually on banal matters (like how waterproof a watch is). The music alternates eerie silences with harsh nerve-wracking strings and drums. Shots of surgery and blood churn the stomach. The widescreen settings have an amphitheatrical stretch. Alone among recent films, it sends you out in catharsis — “calm of mind, all passion spent.” This film releases you, drained.

A man’s misdeed brings down a curse upon his entire house that only his own immense sacrifice can expiate. That’s the Greek tragedy, beside which our mundane stories of simple guilt, rationalization, mercy, forgiveness, and even human justice — the business of cops and courts — dwindle into insignificance.

[2] From the very first scene, to where your mind goes in regard to the sexual nature of the relationships, to the inappropriate or generally eyebrow-raising topics of discussion between some of the characters, this film is MEANT to BE “creepy” and to make the viewer FEEL odd, off – and even dirty.

Much of the creepy-factor, if you will, comes PRECISELY FROM the amazing way in which most of these talented actors made these characters come across as disturbing, unappealing, ALMOST like most of us, ALMOST worth sympathizing with, but not quite. It would have lost much as a film of this nature had the acting been that of a normal or run-of-the-mill family). Again, EVERYTHING, from the topics of conversations, to their postures, to their almost detached delivery, was purposeful and meant to lend to the eeriness of the film and the discomfort of the viewer.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Spoiler-Free Reviews of Four 2023 Series

EmmaLeave a comment

Happy New Year to my FAB readers!

Don’t forget to follow (by subscribing to the RSS feed), IF you haven’t done so before. 

What shows do y’all recommend from this past yr?

Take care,

EMMA

Beef (Neflix) starring Steven Yeun & Ali Wong

A road rage incident in SoCal entwines the lives of a struggling motel owner, Danny Cho (Yeun), and a wealthy art gallery owner, Amy Lau (Wong). This unique/thought-provoking series (renewed for S2) was created by Lee Sung Jin, a Korean-American young man who worked his way up in Hollywood. We get a look into the lives of characters who are NOT often seen in (mainstream) series/movies. There are several supporting players who get their own scenes to shine; they aren’t any “model minority” stereotypes. The role of religion (Christianity- in this case) is delved into; it is treated in a sensitive/nuanced manner. There are hilarious moments, as well as serious ones (I don’t want to give anything away)). IF you’re an immigrant or 1st gen in the US, you’ll be esp. able to relate to this show! I was V impressed by Yeun (who is now 40); I’ve seen him in a few (supporting) roles in recent yrs.

Full Circle (MAX) starring Zazie Beetz, Claire Danes, Jim Gaffigan, Timothy Olyphant, & CCH Pounder

This is a limited series (6 eps) dir. by Steven Soderbergh; he also operates the camera (as is his method). The show was inspired by Akira Kurosawa’s 1963 film High and Low, which in turn was based on the novel King’s Ransom by Evan Hunter (pen name of Ed McBain), part of McBain’s 87th Precinct series. However, this is NOT a typical police show; it’s a mix of crime/mystery/social drama. Danes and Olyphant play a wealthy Manhattan couple w/ secrets which come back to affect them after their teen son is kidnapped. Beetz is getting a LOT of roles lately; here she plays a postal inspector who is battling emotional issues. As her boss, Gaffigan gets to do a (rare) dramatic/Everyman role. Pounder plays a powerful/soft-spoken crime leader w/in the Guyanese community of Queens. There are several (young/newcomer) actors who are part of the ensemble; they all do a good job. We get to see neighborhoods of Queens which are NOT often shown in the media. I didn’t know much re: Guyana (a small country in South America where English is spoken) until the semester I worked at an afterschool program in Ozone Park, Queens. As we gather from this series, Guyana’s population is diverse; ethnic groups originated from India, Africa, Europe, China, and incl. indigenous peoples.

The Last of Us (MAX) starring Pedro Pascal & Bella Ramsay

This is probably one of the most talked about series of 2023; it’s based on a V popular video game! Pascal became one of the most searched celebs online (“internet’s boyfriend”). He and Ramsay (British; non-binary) BOTH worked on Game of Thrones. Here is a brief synopsis: 20 yrs after modern civilization is been destroyed, Joel (Pascal), a hardened survivor, is hired to smuggle Ellie (Ramsay), a 14 y.o. girl, out of a quarantine zone. It becomes a brutal/heartbreaking journey, as they cross the US, depending on ea. other for survival. I was a BIT skeptical of this show, BUT I enjoyed it V much! There are some gruesome elements, incl. blood, fighting, other types of violence (could bother sensitive viewers). We meet a variety of characters; some appear for one ep, others have a wider arc.

Shadow and Bone: Season 2 (Netflix) starring Jessie Mei Li, Ben Barnes, Archie Renaux, Freddy Carter, Amita Suman, & Kit Young

In most fantasy, darkness is metaphorical; it’s just a way of talking about evil: darkness falls across the land, a dark age is coming, etc. I wanted to take something figurative and make it literal. So the question became: what if darkness was a place? What if the monsters lurking there were real and more horrible than anything you’d ever imagined beneath your bed or behind the closet door? What if you had to fight them on their own territory, blind and helpless in the dark? These ideas eventually became the Shadow Fold. -Leigh Bardugo, author

I know what some of y’all are thinking: I’m TOO old for this show! LOL… I’d have to agree, after seeing the hot mess that was S2. Like some other Netflix shows, there are a LOT of cute/diverse/young characters, BUT w/ little development. Some eps are slow, while others go by SO fast, the viewer is left confused. As for S1, I found it interesting (incl. the unique production design and SFX). I was curious b/c SO many (Twitter) gal pals were discussing it. Of course, some are fans of British actor Ben Barnes (Gen. Kirigan); I suggest seeing S1 of Westworld instead (where he also plays a baddie). As for the (main) romance, I didn’t see much chemistry btwn Alina (Mei Li) and Mal (Renaux); I’d have preferred to see more of another couple (who barely got screen time in S2). Young (Jesper) has a LOT of charisma and screen presence; I think he’ll be the breakout among The Crows. I haven’t read the books, though found them at my local Little Free Library.

Spoiler-Free Reviews of Three 2023 Movies

EmmaLeave a comment

Killers of the Flower Moon

In 1920s Oklahoma, a simple-minded/former WWII soldier, Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio), comes under the influence of his powerful/businessman uncle, William Hale (Robert DeNiro). In this area, the members of the Osage nation are V wealthy, as they hold land rights (to where oil was discovered). While working as a driver, Ernest meets and courts Mollie (Lily Gladstone), a young/single Osage woman who comes from a family of several sisters. Ernest and Mollie marry and have children, though their life together is NOT always smooth. In time, we learn of (mysterious) deaths of several Osage; the (newly formed) FBI sends agents to investigate, incl. Tom White (Jesse Plemons).

IF the 3 hrs. and 26 mins. run time doesn’t put you off, then you should check it out. I feel V important events, issues, and themes are discussed. I saw it w/ 2 of my friends a few weeks after it was released. I think younger (under 25) audiences could have a tough time, as they have shorter attention spans. Modern viewers are also NOT used to such long takes of scenes, some of which could’ve been edited further. IF you’re sensitive to blood, racist/sexist language, and violence, this MAY be difficult to watch; director Martin Scorsese films don’t shy away from these elements.

DiCaprio (who made a salary of $30M) is wearing a downturned (frowning) expression w/ his brows knit tightly; some critics commented that Ernest is working hard to understand what’s going on (as he’s NOT V smart). Gladstone is prominent in the 1st half of the film; she can express a LOT while speaking little. DeNiro plays the affable (unofficial) patriarch; he speaks the Osage language and knows the culture. I thought that most of the supporting (mostly NOT famous) characters did a good job and fit their roles; the standout was Louis Cancelmi (as several critics have noted). The production design was V impressive; you can tell that a LOT of research went into this production.

I was disappointed that the FBI storyline was NOT as developed much as I expected. The FBI came in ONLY in the last 1/3 of the movie; Tatanka Means (son of activist/actor Russell Means) is the young/handsome Native American agent. As some of you MAY know, the (original) script had DiCaprio playing Tom White and focused more on the law & order angle. When Scorsese decided to focus more on Ernest and Mollie’s story, Plemons was brought on to play Agent White (who became a supporting character). There are some V effective shots which will stay in your mind; we wouldn’t expect less from Scorsese. What did you think of the ending? I think it was an unusual directorial decision. This story did get me emotional in the final moments.

Napoleon

I went to see this movie on a TUES about one week after it was released; I ONLY paid $7 for the ticket (at Regal). I didn’t have high hopes, BUT was curious to see what director Ridley Scott had done. I was disappointed to see that French actor, Tahar Rahim (who plays aristocrat/general Paul Barras), was ONLY in the first 1/3 of the story. English actress Vanessa Kirby (Josephine) is a strong onscreen presence; I wanted to know a BIT more about her. As for Joaquin Phoenix in the lead role, I was NOT impressed by the characterization (we know he is a strong actor). He speaks w/ an American accent and is now close to 50; Napoleon accomplished much as a young man. Napoleon often looks tired, annoyed, and petulant; we see him planning battles (in ONLY one scene) though he was famed for strategy. As one critic said, this movie shows us “the greatest hits” (just 3 of his battles). As for these few action scenes, I thought they were done quite well. Some of the background CGI is NOT that realistic. At the end, I saw that the (small) audience I went to see it w/ was NOT impressed. Scott’s work in the past 15 yrs. has been hit or miss.

Oppenheimer

I went to see this movie the day after it was released, as I had time off that afternoon; the (IMAX) theater was full w/ viewers of ALL ages. I’m sure MANY of you have heard/read re: this movie, so I won’t give a synopsis. I was glad to see that Cillian Murphy (an Irish actor I admire) got a starring role; he is now 47 y.o. (so it’s high time). He is up to the challenge of carrying the film; there are MANY close-ups of his face. My audience seemed to enjoy the scenes w/ Murphy and Matt Damon (in the 1st act); they have good onscreen chemistry and quippy banter. Even more so than w/ KOTFM, we see supporting actors who each get a chance to shine. The standouts among the scientists are two Americans: David Krumholtz (who started out in teen comedies) and Benny Safdie (also an indie director). There are some cameos which MAY surprise viewers.

Unfortunately, we don’t get a LOT of character development for the 2 main women- Kitty (Emily Blunt) and Jean (Florence Pugh). Blunt gets more to do than Pugh; as some critics said in the past, director Christopher Nolan doesn’t focus much on women. Another issue is the (incessantly overdramatic) music which I did NOT appreciate! There are a few shots (whether practical or special effects) that were V impressive. When we get to the last act, it looked like people were NOT as engaged. This is the section where we see more of Robert Downey, Jr; his young aide is played by Alden Ehrenreich (who was the co-lead in Fair Play). It was a V long movie, BUT I was mostly interested in the material. Nolan isn’t much for emotion (as y’all cinephiles know), BUT he does have an unique viewpoint here.

#Noirvember: “Abandoned” (1949) starring Dennis O’Keefe, Gale Storm, Jeff Chandler, & Raymond Burr

EmmaLeave a comment

NO NAME FOR HER BABY…only a PRICE! -A tagline for the movie

This B-movie delves into an unusual/sensitive topic for its day: black market baby adoptions. A young woman, Paula Considine (Gale Storm), from a small-town comes to a police station in L.A. She is looking for info on her missing younger sister; a local newspaper reporter, Mark Sitko (Dennis O’Keefe), offers to help. There is a burly/tall man, Kerric (Raymond Burr), lurking in the shadows and following Paula. Her sister’s dead body is in the morgue; there is evidence that she recently gave birth! Though it looks like suicide to the coroner, Paula insists there must’ve been foul play. Also, what happened to the baby?

Mark [to Kerric]: You couldn’t sleep, so you decided to take your gun out for a walk.

I saw this film (free on YouTube) last week; it moves along quickly, w/ snappy dialogue, and a variety of characters. Several of these actors went on to long/successful careers in TV. Burr (best known as Perry Mason) is working for the main baddie, a matronly “society lady” w/ a cane, Mrs. Donner (Marjorie Rambeau). In one tense scene, Burr fights one of her henchmen, played by Mike Mazurki (another “heavy” often in noirs). As for the good guys, Major Ross of The Salvation Army (Jeanette Nolan- looking FAB after 40), is an ally to pregnant women w/ no place to turn. Mark’s handsome/cop friend is Chief McCrae (Jeff Chandler); I hadn’t seen this actor before, BUT learned that he became a TV star.

[1] This excellent thriller deals with the sale of stolen babies by baby broker racketeers. It is thus more relevant to today, when this problem is much more widespread, than it was in 1949. The plot is sound, the script first rate, and the acting is extremely good. […]

A sinister sub-plot about the father of the two sisters making his daughter get rid of her illegitimate baby seems to have been cut because it was too shocking, but enough of it survives to show that it was clearly once there.

[2] I loved the camerawork… particularly in the early portions of the film. The angles and shadows are great… and very moody. I also loved the incredibly violent and gritty ending, where evil clearly is punished big time! Overall, a well written and acted film that never is dull and is well worth your time.

[3] Despite an obviously low budget, “Abandoned” benefits from location filming, which adds a documentary touch, enhanced by narration that implies some truth to the story. A fine cast of “B” players, memorable photography, and steady direction by Joe Newman, a veteran of modestly budgeted second features, together produced an entertaining, engaging film noir that is well worth catching.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews