Tag: Neo Noir

“The Last Seduction” (1994) starring Linda Fiorentino, Peter Berg, & Bill Pullman

Emma3 Comments

Most People Have a Dark Side. She Had Nothing Else. -A tagline for the film

Bridget Gregory (Lina Fiorentino) has a lot going for her: she’s beautiful, intelligent, and married to a doctor in NYC. But, as her husband Clay (Bill Pullman- in a rare sketchy role) discovers, all of this is NOT enough. After persuading Clay to sell medicinal cocaine to some drug-dealers, she takes off w/ the money ($700K) and goes undercover (calling herself Wendy Kroy) in a small town upstate. Since Clay must pay off a loan shark who will otherwise injure him, he sends private detectives after her, trying to get the money. Bridget meets Mike Swale (Peter Berg- who became a director), a naive local who works as a claims adjuster; he falls for her fast and hard. She devises a plan to get rid of Clay- once and for all.

Frank Griffith (Bridget’s lawyer): Anyone check you for a heartbeat recently?

Director John Dahl initially saw this movie as more of a dark comedy than film noir. An early draft of the script was told from Mike’s POV. According to an interview w/ screenwriter Steve Barancik in Creative Screenwriting, ITC Entertainment execs thought The Last Seduction would be a typical “Skin-e-max” movie (seen on premium cable). One exec was upset when he viewed a scene in which Fiorentino wore a pair of suspenders instead of being totally topless. When viewing the dailies of the scene, the exec asked, “Are we making an art movie?!” He demanded that the scene be cut and made the main cast/crew pledge that they had no “artistic pretensions.” LOL! There are elements that look fresh, BUT a few outdated (possibly offensive) scenes.

Bridget Gregory: You’re my designated f**k.

Mike Swale: Designated f**k? Do they make cards for that? What if I want to be more than your designated f**k?

Bridget Gregory: Then I’ll designate someone else.

What I remember most about it was we were shooting it at the end of the night. We never got a chance to talk about how we were going to do it. By the time we got outside to shoot, it was like 5AM in the morning and the sun was coming up. We had no plan and I didn’t want to do something that looked embarrassing or stupid. I didn’t want to appear to be just this designated sex-toy without some plan. I was suggesting that we maybe come back another day to shoot. John Dahl was upset because he knew he didn’t have the time to come back, and I was being all nervous, and Linda was just smoking a cigarette, watching. After about ten minutes of me rambling on, she threw down the cigarette, looked at me, told me to shut the f**k up, take my pants down, and get up against the fence. She said, “John, get a camera,” and she climbed up on me against that fence and told John Dahl to shoot it, and that was the scene. She thought of it, she conceived it, she executed it. It was awesome. -Peter Berg, on the (infamous) chain-link fence scene

Bridget is a rare lead for Hollywood, as she’s an unapologetic female baddie character. She knows how to take charge at work and in the bedroom (or wherever she hooks up w/ men). Fans of Double Indemnity (one of the most well-known noir films) will notice homages here, esp. the hairstyle (long bob) worn by Bridget and the insurance angle. This was #5 on Roger Ebert’s list of the Best Films of 1994. Fiorentino was widely praised by critics, BUT was denied an Academy Award nom b/c this movie came out on TV (HBO) before its theatrical release. In today’s media landscape, we see the lines blurring btwn TV and movies. After its theatrical releases, movies (usually) will go to a streaming platform. This movie is available on several apps, incl. Freevee and PlutoTV.

[1] It’s surprisingly funny at times. It’s all attitude and Fiorentino is dripping in it. Her dialogue is neo-noir and snappy. I love the dark turns and her glee with making those turns.

[2] The plot is intricate with many twists and turns. The dialogue sounds like it came from a 1940s noir (updated with swearing) but this isn’t anything like those movies.

[3] Pullman was great as the reaper of retribution intent on giving evil for evil. Peter Berg may have stolen the show with his total inability to say no to his own destruction. It was hard to believe the abyss of stupidity these 2 dopes had the capacity to plumb. Guess that’s what happens when the little head takes over the thought processes for the big head, eh? The picture started out a little slow, but developed into a real blowout with a jaw dropping finale.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Women, Power, & Desire: “Impulse” (1990) & “Body of Evidence” (1992)

Emma2 Comments

Impact (1990) starring Theresa Russell, Jeff Fahey, & George Dzundza

She’s an undercover cop. Seduced by a fantasy. Trapped in a mystery. Led by a dangerous impulse. It’s easy to lose control. -Taglines for the film

This is a psychological thriller co-written by a woman (Leigh Chapman) and directed by a woman- Sondra Locke (who had a palimony suit against Clint Eastwood while making this film). I learned re: Locke’s and Eastwood’s (turbulent) relationship on a recent ep of the podcast You Must Remember This (hosted by Karina Longworth). Yikes, Eastwood does NOT come out looking good! It was V difficult for Locke (who worked as an actress on Eastwood’s projects) to get funding for this small-budget movie (distributed by Warner Bros). In some ways, it’s ahead of it’s time!

Lottie Mason (Russell) is an undercover cop in the LAPD; she’s tall, blonde, and tough (ONLY trusts in herself). Her boss, Lt. Joe Morgan (Dzundza), has been sexually harassing her; we learn this in an early scene. Her bills are piling up and she is TOO invested in her job. While Lottie is helping an ADA- Stan (Fahey)- set-up a drug buy w/ a witness he needs for a case, they become romantically involved. They have a love scene which is unusual for that era, as it’s mainly re: intense gazes (which build tension).

It’s rare (even today) to see a movie centered on a female cop; it has become common on TV/streaming shows. Impulse is gritty, moody, and Russell is believable as a street-smart/independent-minded woman (w/ a hidden soft side). Lottie’s nights of dealing w/ lowlifes has affected her personal life; her Vice assignments incl. impersonating streetwalkers and junkies. She has mandated therapy sessions w/ Dr. Gardner (Lynn Thigpen), where she admits to having a fantasy of losing control and acting on (darker) impulses. Though some viewers felt it was a BIT slow, I think fans of the noir genre or cop dramas may like it. Both Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert called this “a V good thriller.” You can see it on Freevee.)

Body of Evidence (1992) starring Madonna & Willem Dafoe

An act of love, or an act of murder? -Tagline for the film

An elderly millionaire in Portland is found dead of heart failure handcuffed to his bed; a home video of him and a woman is running in the background. When cocaine is found in his system, and his will leaves $8 million to this woman (his lover)- Rebecca Carlson (Madonna)- police arrest her on suspicion of murder. Her lawyer, Frank Dulaney (Dafoe), succumbs to her charms and they start a (reckless) affair. As new evidence turns up during trial, Frank begins to wonder if he’s defending a murderer. (I saw the R-rated version on Freevee; many yrs. ago, I saw it on cable.)

Frank Dulaney: It’s not a crime to be a great lay!

Robert Garrett: Well, sure. l’d have to have myself indicted.

Body of Evidence is often (negatively) compared to Basic Instinct; shooting began only 2 weeks after that film was released, so the similarities are probably coincidental. However, the huge success of Paul Verhoeven’s film could still have influenced the direction and editing. Madonna met w/ a (real-life) dominatrix, who taught her how to tie someone’s arms behind their back using a belt. Dafoe attended a criminal trial; it was interrupted when several people (incl. the judge and many jurors) recognized him and wanted to talk. This is on Roger Ebert’s 2005 list of his most hated films. If you enjoy comedy podcasts, check out the ep reviewing this movie on How Did This Get Made?

Frank Dulaney: Counsel for the Prosecution has already used this witness to establish the state of mind of the deceased. He opened the can, Your Honor.

Judge Burnham: And I do see worms crawling all around you, Mr. Garrett.

Madonna was the 1st choice to play Rebecca; producer Dino De Laurentiis purchased the script b/c he believed it was the perfect role for her. She has short/platinum hair, V pale (unflattering) makeup, red lipstick, and designer clothes. Madonna personally selected Dafoe as her co-star, BUT they have no romantic chemistry together! As many filmmakers have noted over the yrs, casting is V important. Also, where is the development of the characters!? Frank seems eager (quite early on) to do what Rebecca prefers. In one of the (later) steamy scenes, Dafoe looks hesitant (as if performing a chore). Madonna’s acting coach quit just before production began, claiming that “she thinks she knows everything.” As this movie will show, she is a V limited actress. The dialogue given to her is NO help at all! The movie’s (German) director, Uli Edel, said Madonna refused to be directed in the sex scenes. She insisted on pouring (real/hot) wax on Dafoe’s chest in (perhaps the most controversial) scene- ouch! To y’all younger gen viewers, little of this content will look daring.

I was too young to know better. It was the first time I’d been asked to get naked and it turned out to be completely extraneous and gratuitous. Ugh. It was a terrible film and a terrible performance by me. It was about nothing, and I didn’t need to be doing it. -Julianne Moore

Joe Mantegna (who plays prosecutor Robert Garrett) said filming the courtroom scenes was so tedious that 2 extras (jurors) fell asleep during Dafoe’s closing statement. Mantegna (always reliable) yelled at them to wake them up- LOL! The director doesn’t know how to make the trial visually interesting. The judge has lines which (in retrospect) are sassy/funny. Anne Archer does OK what little she is given. A young Julianne Moore plays Sharon (Frank’s wife); she runs a successful restaurant and is mom to a preteen son (seen in just one scene). Moore (who can tackle any role) later said she regretted taking this on; she was then new to movies. Frank Langella has a small/pivotal role as a man from Rebecca’s past. One of Madonna’s besties (actress Sandra Bernhard) was heard laughing at the premiere, commenting: “This is not a serious movie!”

[1] It is both as bad as you remember it, but somehow endlessly entertaining.

[2] The movie goes from the ridiculous to the sublime and every thing else in between, and by the time the movie is over, you feel like you went over Niagara Falls on a surf board.

[3] The courtroom and crime scenes is just background to what the movie is, Madonna in the bedroom.

[4] …might have been much more fun had it the slightest sense of humor. Alas, all the laughs here are unintentional, and the straight-faced actors just end up looking foolish. […] For camp-addicts, a hoot; all others beware.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Gunshy” (1998) starring William Petersen, Michael Wincott, & Diane Lane

EmmaLeave a comment

Jake Bridges: [narrating] I always wanted to be close to dangerous guys. Even wanted to be a dangerous guy. Truth is, didn’t know what I wanted.

After losing his job at a NYC magazine and finding his gf in bed w/ a younger man, a depressed writer named Jake Bridges (William Petersen) goes on a drinking spree in Atlantic City, NJ. At a seedy-looking bar, Jake gets argumentative w/ a tough/beefy patron (played by singer Meat Loaf). The fight turns violent fast and continues out on the street. Suddenly, a stranger comes to Jake’s rescue! This man is an enforcer named Frankie (Michael Wincott); he takes Jake to his house. Luckily for Jake, Frankie’s gf Melissa (Diane Lane) is a nurse. Frankie wants to become book-smart; in return, he’ll teach Jake how to be street-smart. Jake even gets a bit of a makeover (w/ a tailored suit). Soon, Jake feels himself drawn into Frankie’s (criminal) world and falls in love w/ Melissa. Jake also gets inspo to write- again!

Frankie: A man once told me that the only thing you really own is a piece of ground the size of your shoes.

Perhaps you are fans of the 3 leads, who were NOT then big stars at that time. Petersen (best known as the lead on the CBS drama CSI) had appeared in 2 big films- To Live and Die in L.A. (1985) and Manhunter (1986). Those of you (near my age) may know him from Young Guns II or as Reese Witherspoon’s dad in the teen drama/thriller Fear (1996). Lane was having a lull in her career (which I don’t understand); I think she does a good job w/ what she is given here. She’d soon receive critical acclaim for roles in A Walk on the Moon (1999) and Unfaithful (2002). A character actor (playing tough guys/villains), Wincott had a key supporting role in Jordan Peele’s latest movie- Nope (2022). Wincott plays a cinematographer obsessed w/ getting the perfect shot.

Melissa: What can I tell you about men? They want you to be their daughter, their mother, their addiction. They want you to want them, and then they don’t want you anymore.

This is for those of y’all who want to dive deep into the film noir genre. You can see this low-budget indie for free (Crackle or Plex). The video was pausing for me on those apps, so I rented it (Amazon). There are tropes found in noirs of the ’40s and ’50s, BUT w/ ’90s attitudes and modern language. The locations/sets are (usually) bleak and darkly lit. Some of the dialogue is predictable, BUT some of it still comes off as fresh. From what I read/heard, viewers esp. liked the scenes btwn. Petersen and Wincott (where they read/discuss the classic book- Moby Dick). We see that Frankie possesses some good qualities that Jake lacks. The movie blurs the distinction btwn hero and villain. There is also a plot twist after the hour mark.

[1] Well acted and with solid dialogue, the film has a few cliched moments, but they are ultimately forgivable in the end.

[2] The plot, too seems somewhat contrived in bringing together Petersen and Wincott as friends, but somehow the whole is better than the sum of it’s parts. Once Wincott enters, it is an engaging though flawed piece with good action sequences. With more care in the scripting, this could have been a really good film but as it is, well worth a watch.

[3] The film may seem dated at the beginning, but follow the story and you’ll be surprised, and pleased. The editing is clearly 1998; if it were shot and edited today, it would probably be smoother, and a bit more coherent. There are pieces of the soundtrack that are very pleasing, but mostly too 90’s in style. The movie probably would be a terrific re-make…

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Frank & Lola” (2016) starring Michael Shannon & Imogen Poots

Emma2 Comments

A psychosexual noir love story, set in Las Vegas and Paris, about love, obsession, sex, betrayal, revenge and, ultimately, the search for redemption. -Synopsis

Frank (Michael Shannon- in his 1st romantic leading role) works as a chef in a classy/high-end restaurant in Vegas. One night, he meets a young student who wants a career in fashion, Lola (Imogen Poots- a petite/blonde British actress). Frank’s (calm/routine) life is changed by Lola, who may NOT be as uncomplicated as she seems! I saw Shannon (6’3″ w/ large/wide-set eyes) a few yrs. ago in the indie drama 99 Homes (starring Andrew Garfield); I was impressed b/c he had such a commanding screen presence. In they stylish Nocturnal Animals, he made a fine impression as a small-town cop. Shannon is the lead in Midnight Special co-starring Adam Driver (my current fave actor). To add some (needed) lightness/comedy to the story, we have Justin Long. Rosanna Arquette has a small role as Lola’s mother. Michael Nyquist (a famed Swedish actor/fluent French speaker) has an important supporting role; he passed away in 2017. Writer/director Matthew Ross had been trying to make this film for 10 yrs prior to its release in 2016- wow! It was shot in less than one month on location in Vegas and Paris. The film was well-received at Sundance.

Beware, my Lord, of jealousy, it is the green-eyed monster that doth mock the meat it feeds on. -Iago in Othello

I was reminded of the (above) line from my fave Shakespearean tragedy while watching this movie. Like Othello and Desdemona, Frank and Lola are opposites when it comes to age, looks, and personalities. Frank is of a different generation than Lola. They don’t know much about each other before they become involved; Lola is new in town and Frank (w/ a no-nonsense attitude) says he doesn’t fall in love easily. Lola says she was attracted to Frank b/c he’s a “real man.” We realize that Frank has insecurities when it comes to romance, though he is V experienced/confident in his career.

The look (visual style) sometimes reminded me of the movies of director Michael Mann. I liked how the filmmakers shot the Vegas and Paris scenes quite differently. Most of the movie was filmed at night; Vegas is depicted as modern, steely, and cold (isolating). We see some daytime in Paris; the look is softer and warmer (more inviting). Shannon speaks some French, too. If you’re a fan of the noir genre (like me), you may like this movie. As one viewer noted: “rarely do contemporary movies go as deep into the male psyche of obsession as this one.” You can watch it on Netflix.

#Oscars: “Decision to Leave” (2022) starring Park Hae-il & Tang Wei

EmmaLeave a comment

From a mountain peak in South Korea, a man plummets to his death. Did he jump, or was he pushed? When detective Hae-joon arrives on the scene, he begins to suspect the dead man’s wife Seo-rae. But as he digs deeper into the investigation, he finds himself trapped in a web of deception and desire. -Official Synopsis

If I cannot avoid it, then I embrace it. –Park Chan-wook (director), when asked re: modern technology in this film

This film (streaming on MUBI) is the official submission of South Korea for the Best International Feature Film category of the 95th Academy Awards in 2023. I’d previously seen The Handmaiden, also directed by Park Chan-wook (who is in a league of his own); here we find a V different (yet also compelling) story. I was curious to see it, as I heard it was a blend of mystery, noir, and (slow burn) romance. The inspo for Decision to Leave was the Swedish crime novel series The Story of a Crime by Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö, which is re: aging police detective Martin Beck and contains social critique. At first, Chan-wook didn’t like the idea of using text messages; he’d considered a period piece (where the characters send hand written letters). When he decided on a modern setting, he put in a smart watch, voice recordings, and translation apps. Chan-wook used cell phone POV shots to show that the characters are NOT only looking at the screens, BUT to give a sense that they’re looking at the other person.

I envisioned it to be slow and gradual, but the actor [Hae-il] held the look for a moment too long before asking for the pattern to unlock her cell phone. -Chan-wook, when asked re: the possible “love at first sight” element

Jan Hae-joon (Park Hae-il) is an experienced cop in the big city of Busan; he’s in middle-age, wears custom-tailored suits, BUT can also run/fight better than some of the younger men. He’s a “dignified” man who is perhaps TOO invested in his work; one reviewer was reminded of Det. Vincent Hanna in Michael Mann’s Heat. Like many modern marrieds in South Korea (as my friend explained after her recent trip to Seoul), he and his wife (a scientist) live/work in separate cities, so see each other on weekends. The femme fatale is Song Seo-rae (Tang Wei, co-star of Lust, Caution), who reminded me of those beautiful/mysterious women of classic Hollywood. Both of the leads are able to portray vulnerability so well! It’s obvious that some of the authorities are suspicious of Seo-rae b/c she is Chinese (a foreigner) and much younger than her wealthy/powerful husband. There is a younger cop partnered w/ Hae-joon who provides comedy, as he has a LOT to learn and improve upon in his work.

This film is esp. well-edited and creatively shot, as many critics noted. There is much natural beauty to admire, going from city to mountains and- finally- the sea. There is no doubt that these filmmakers have an unique take, as they embrace, yet also subvert, the tropes of the crime drama. I esp. enjoyed the (gentle) romantic scenes in the 2nd act; Chan-wook said he was inspired by David Lean’s Brief Encounter. Many viewers were reminded of Hitchcock’s Vertigo, though the director said that wasn’t an influence.