“All We Imagine as Light” (2024) starring Kani Kusruti, Deepa Prabha, & Chhaya Kadam

In Mumbai, Nurse Prabha’s routine is troubled when she receives an unexpected gift from her estranged husband. Her younger roommate, Anu, tries in vain to find a spot in the city to be intimate with her boyfriend. A trip to a beach town allows them to find a space for their desires to manifest. -Synopsis

This is the 1st Indian film to screen in competition at Cannes in 30 yrs; it was awarded the Grand Prix in 2024. The topic is NOT something we see V often- the emotional and social lives of 3 ordinary/working women living in a big city (Bombay/Mumbai). What brings the women together is the fact that they work at the same clinic and a shared language (Malayalam). Prabha (Kani Kusruti) is an experienced nurse in her 30s whose husband moved to Germany yrs. ago; they have rarely been in contact. Anu (Divya Prabha) is a 20s nurse who is secretly dating a (Muslim) man; she is Prabha’s roomie. Parvaty (Chhaya Kadam) is a cook in her 50s; she is widowed w/ an adult son.

Anu: How could you marry a total stranger? I don’t think I could.

Prabha: You might think you know someone, but they can also become strangers.

The writer/director, Payal Kapadia, is NOT afraid to look at (uneasy) topics of loneliness, uncertain romantic relationships, and socioeconomic struggles. Now, some of you’re wondering what is the big deal about Hindus and Muslims dating in modern India!? Just look up what’s occurring in PM Modi’s government, when you get a chance. Parvaty is facing eviction from her (long-time) home b/c she lacks certain documents. A developer wants to tear down her building to raise up luxury condos. Kapadia uses a cinematic style that is both personal (close-ups of the women) and expansive (wide-ranging shots of the cityscape). In the third act, the story moves from the hustle/bustle of Mumbai to a quiet/rural village (the ancestral home of Parvaty). I don’t want to reveal TOO much; check this film out if you want an alternative to Bollywood.

[1] The film beautifully juxtaposes the stillness of personal struggles against the relentless pace of urban life, creating an intimate yet universal portrait of longing and resilience. However, while the storytelling is subtle and poetic, it lacks a true climax, leaving certain narrative threads unresolved. Despite this, the film’s delicate atmosphere, compelling performances, and evocative cinematography make it a poignant, meditative experience that lingers beyond the screen.

[2] Kapadia’s direction doesn’t hold back in any scene, in any frame. While Ranabir Roy also deserves appreciation for the mersmerising cinematography. The screenplay is topnotch. Kani Kusruti achors the film with her splendid, characteristically restrained performance as Prabha. And Chhaya Kadam is a treat to watch.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

20th Anniversary: “Pride & Prejudice” & “Star Wars: Episode III – The Revenge of the Sith”

Recently, there were special events (incl. re-releases) centered on 2 much loved (and much-maligned) blockbuster movies from my mid-20s- Pride and Prejudice (P&P) and Star Wars: Episode III – The Revenge of the Sith (TRS). Nostalgia is a big thing these days, esp. among those who are Xennials (b. 1977-1983) and Millennials (b. 1981-1996). Were you a fan (or hater) of P&P and/or TRS upon 1st release? Have you re-watched these movies? Have your opinions changed? Let me know your thoughts (in comments below)!

P&P (which boasted a cast of soon-to-be famous/cute/young faces) is an important film to my fam: we watched it in the theater over Thanksgiving 2005 (w/ my future BIL)! On a recent re-watch, I realized that it’s still a fun/well-made movie, though NOT accurate to Jane Austen’s book (as many have said in past). The young/British director, Joe Wright, had a fresh/controversial take on the Bennett fam (incl. their farm-style home, hairstyles, clothes, and-perhaps a BIT too quirky- personalities). I was (again) impressed by ALL the British character actors. When it came to casting, Rosamund Pike (who studied Austen in college) fitted the role of Jane perfectly. The best things about this adaptation are its music (composed by Dario Marinelli) and Matthew McFadyen. The tall/theatrically-trained actor conveys Mr. Darcy’s (unspoken) shyness, sadness (he lost parents when young), and vulnerability. And when Darcy (a socially awkward hero) finally smiles- wow, he wins over the audience!

In the climax of TRS, Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen)- in Sith mode- declares to his Jedi mentor/BFF, Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor): “If you’re not with me, then you’re my enemy!” For the “olds” (like me), this may remind you of former prez. (Dubya’s) words after 9/11: “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Is the acting good? Well, it’s a mixed bag; Chancellor/Emperor Palpatine (Ian McDiarmid) is compelling/effective in his scenes. The film’s most important element is Anakin’s seduction to the Dark Side of the Force by Palpatine. One reviewer on IMDb said: “He is the lifeblood of the film.” Is the writing good? Well, it’s still basic (as w/ the 2 earlier prequels). Is the directing (by Lucas himself) effective? This is tough to judge, but Star Wars fans know Lucas is infamous for NOT saying much to help along the performance of his actors. There are times when I cringed, wondering why he didn’t give the actors another take of a scene. The first 20 mins. (mainly action) are quite exciting, as are the final 30 mins. (incl. the battle btwn. Anakin and Obi-Wan). The music (composed by John Williams) continues to be impressive, as you’d expect. Hey, I still got a BIT emotional at the end- I’m NOT immune to nostalgia!

“A Streetcar Named Desire” (BAM) starring Paul Mescal, Patsy Ferran, & Anjana Vasan

On FRI, March 14th, I went (for the 1st time) to Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) to see Tennessee Williams’ iconic play- A Streetcar Named Desire. The area was buzzing (w/ a LOT of tourists and locals); the Harvey Theatre is a few blocks away from the Barclays Center. If you haven’t visited NYC recently, the Atlantic Avenue subway station is now called Atlantic Avenue–Barclays Center (2, 3, 4, 5, B, Q, D, N R, & W trains). The crowd was more diverse than I expected; there were (as expected) many young women in their 20s, incl. WOC. There were also quite a few older (perhaps regulars) aged 50+, as in my row. I booked long in advance, so I was able to get good seat.

This critically-acclaimed production (directed by Rebecca Frecknall) was transferred from across the pond- London’s West End. This director emphasized the growing power of patriarchy w/ the way she chose to stage this play, one critic said. Stanley Kowalski is played by Paul Mescal, a 29 y.o. a blue-eyed Irish actor and one of the rising stars in Hollywood. Mescal appeared in the TV drama/romance Normal People, indie movies (Aftersun; All of Us Strangers), and Ridley Scott’s big-budget sequel (Gladiator II). The staging was open and design was V simple; there are few furnishings in the Kowalski home. On one side of the stage, there are stairs which go up to the balcony. This production includes (brief) interludes w/ dance and music. Water comes down to shower the actors in two pivotal moments. I thought the way lighting design was quite effective.

I know what some of y’all are thinking… Is Mescal as cute and fit IRL? Yes, he looks V good (though not a fan of this modern mullet); he has (well-defined) arms and abs, long after Gladiator. Stanley (a model of toxic masculinity) isn’t TOO bothered w/ the concerns/needs of women around him. He cares about bowling and poker nights w/ his buddies. His wife, Stella, is played by a lovely/wide-eyed British Asian (South Asian- as in US) actress- Anjana Vasan (37 y.o.) Patsy Ferran (34 y.o.) is an unexpected choice for Blanche DuBois, at least when it comes to looks. She has already won Olivier and Drama Desk awards. These actresses look much younger than their ages!

I don’t want realism, I want magic! -Blanche DuBois

Wow, what a show- I was V impressed! Mescal and Vasan made a believable (yet problematic) couple in love. I’m sure many of you are aware of the dark (serious) themes/events of the play. There is tension growing w/ each scene bwtn Mescal and Ferran (slim/petite w/ dark hair and eyes), as Blanche (obviously) disapproves of Stanley. Ferran goes toe-to-toe w/ Mescal (who is transformed- in part to American accent/body language); she reveals emotional vulnerability in one moment, after charming us w/ her wit/intelligence. The audience was captivated more… and more… as the play went on. When Stanley slaps Stella (who is pregnant), it was a big shock (esp. for those who didn’t read the play/see the Brando movie). In the climax, when Blanche grabs a beer bottle to defend herself against Stanley, a woman in front of me whispered “it’s not real” to her mom. In the finale, Stanley crouches down and embraces Stella, who is cryng/distraught on the floor. One of Mescal’s pale/powerful arm wraps around Vasan’s upper body, showing that (in the world of this play) Stanley has truly won!

[1] Lines that I could recite alongside the actors resonated in ways that I never expected. The great majority of them are spoken by Ferran, who triumphs where such incandescent talents as Jessica Lange, Blanchett and Natasha Richardson could find only sporadic magic. […]

What sets Ferran apart is the way she balances the play’s poetry and realism, moving with lightning reflexes from crushing naturalism to bold expressionism. …Ferran, a Spanish British actress, is completely fluent in the playwright’s grand, streetwise lyricism. Accent and idiom are firmly in command as she transitions from Southern Gothic to surrealist horror, never losing sight of a character who’s as fragile as she is formidable.

-LA Times

[2] The playwright’s identification with Blanche, reflected in her care with words, is all but drowned out. We are not invited to inhabit her hopes and fears but rather her brother-in-law’s animal glee.

This is certainly a way to see “Streetcar”; the world is, if possible, even meaner than Williams imagined. Decay has swallowed lyricism. And Stanley, we now know, has won.

NYT

“Sibyl” (2019) starring Virginie Efira, Adele Exarchopoulos, Gaspard Ulliel, & Sandra Huller

This French film (made for ONLY 5M euros) from Justine Triet (director/co-writer) and partner, Arthur Harari (co-writer/supporting actor), follows a 30-something psychotherapist, Sibyl (Virginie Efira). She is also wife to Etienne (Paul Hamy) and mom to 2 young kids. Sibyl decides to return to writing (her 1st career), yet still keeps a few patients. Harari plays Dr. Katz (Sibyl’s therapist), as is required in the mental health profession. One night, while dealing w/ writer’s block, Sibyl gets a (frantic) call from 20-ish/up-and-coming actress, Margot (Adèle Exarchopoulos). As Sibyl becomes more… and more wrapped up in Margot’s (turbulent) life, she starts to blur her past from the present… and reality from fiction!

I became curious re: this (genre-defying) film b/c it involved Triet, Harari, and Huller; it was made before they achieved international fame/critical acclaim w/ Anatomy of a Fall (2023). This is the last film released during his lifetime for Gaspard Ulliel (who plays Igor); he died in a ski accident in 2022 at just age 38. I hadn’t seen Efira’s acting before; she hails from Belgian. Efira and Niels Schneider (who plays Gabriel) are a couple IRL w/ one child. Exarchopoulos (then only 26 y.o.) has a French mother and Greek father; she co-starred in several well-known indies. The movie w/in the movie (starring Margot and Igor) was shot on the island of Stromboli (a part of Sicily, Italy).

From the trailer, I was expecting the tone of a dark/thriller; however, there are funny moments! This is free on streaming, so check it out (if in the mood for something unusual). Some viewers wondered: “Who is the patient and who is the therapist?” Gathering from reviews (IMDb; Letterboxd)- ppl are conflicted re: on this movie. Some called it a “hot mess” w/ “hot people”- LOL! Some expected more, yet did enjoy Huller’s performance as a perfectionist/Type A director. As in Anatomy of a Fall, Huller speaks more in English than in French. How cool is it that she can act in 3 languages!?

[1] You have to suspend your disbelief quite a lot and go with the flow. Having a love for making movies and understanding what can go on behind the scenes (it almost feels like someone is doing their own curing by doing the movie – the writer, the director, producers … all of the above and more?)

[2] I can’t recall seeing a film with so many good and great elements: cinematography, acting, a good deal of great dialogue, that was assembled into such a let down of total experience.

[3] The most enjoyable scenes for me were those with Sandra Huller, playing a film director, especially her reactions to the difficulties the actors are creating on her set. Her sensible response to the psychotherapist’s behaviour is long awaited and ultimately very satisfying.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“The Riot Club” (2014) starring Sam Claflin, Max Irons, & Douglas Booth

Filthy. Rich. Spoilt. Rotten. -A tagline for the film

The Bullingdon Club (founded in 1780) was notorious for booking a restaurant, trashing it, then handing the owner a check for damages on the way out. The unofficial club (which still exists today) consists of a group of male elites at Oxford. This film is based on the play Posh (by Lauren Wade); it premiered at the Royal Court Theatre (2010), before transferring to the West End. The Danish director, Lone Scherfig, was at the helm of An Education (2009) and The Kindness of Strangers (2019). Alistair (Sam Claflin) and Miles (Max Irons: son of Jeremy Irons and Sinead Cusack), both come from the British aristocracy. They start their 1st (freshman) year at Oxford. Miles appears relaxed w/ a down-to-earth personality; he starts dating a (middle-class) student, Lauren (Holliday Grainger). Alistair is uptight and wants to emulate his uncle (played by Tom Hollander)- a Tory Minister of Parliament (MP). These two young men end up being tutor partners and pledge to join the Riot Club.

This title came up as I was looking up films of Josh O’Connor; he plays Ed- goofy, naive, yet snobby. George (Jack Farthing- in his 1st movie) is quiet, wide-eyed, and eager to please. The president of the club is James (Freddie Fox: recently on S2 of House of the Dragon); the cast referred to him as “the most posh one” (in press interviews). Fox is the son of 2 veteran British character actors- Edward Fox and Joanna David. Harry (Douglas Booth) has a model-like face and eye for women; his family has a country estate (recently opened for tours). Hugo (Sam Reid- currently on Interview with the Vampire) is confident, titled, yet cash poor. Each of the young actors gets their moment to shine; all give believable performances.

This film could’ve been titled Toxic Masculinity: UK College Edition; it delves into issues which are timely and timeless. What happens when (rich/white) males grow-up w/ (unchecked) privilege? When any problem comes up, their 1st solution is to throw money at it! Women are seen as conquests, NOT friends or potential love interests. Isn’t the time of these type of clubs over? some may ask. Well, there are college boys who die still in hazing rituals at fraternities! College (late teens-early 20s) is time when we become adults (under the law), yet are still forming our identities (and susceptible to peer pressure). This story will take you on an emotional journey. At first, there are a LOT of laughs from witty one-liners; these kids are smart after all. Then, it becomes darker w/ some shocking scenes (which will make you tense/uncomfortable).

[1] As most will know, The Riot Club is inspired by the Bullingdon Club, an Oxford University dining society infamous for its destructive hedonism that boasts alumni such as David Cameron, Boris Johnson and George Osborne. The film’s main target of attack isn’t the purported anti-social behaviour of such people, the obnoxious decadence we witness is not endemic to the highly disagreeable “Riot Club,” what it attacks is rather the characters’ raging, blue-blooded superiority complexes that causes it.

[2] My only complaint about the movie would be the main character (Miles Richards) being a flawless Mary Sue – rich, handsome, witty, intelligent, kind and well meaning, as well as some of the other positive characters being presented as these morally superior beings. That felt very strange for a movie, the main idea of which is that not everything is as black and white as it seems, and we all just try to justify our own actions while doing what we feel (not think) is best.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews