














I heard about this film from MANY young (20s/30s) desi people. It was released in the Spring of 2015; it’s NOT a typical Bollywood film, though the stars hail from mainstream Indian cinema. Amitabh Bachchan (Bhashkor Banerjee) and Deepika Padukone (Piku) play Delhi-based Bengali father and daughter respectively. One of my favorite actors- Irrfan Khan (Rana) plays the driver who takes them from Delhi to Calcutta.

General Thoughts about the Film:
‘Piku’ is about relationships and responsibility. You feel for the characters & that kind of connect, is a huge bonus for any film.
…what is wrong with movies that are mostly dialogue and the interactions of close knit families? I found it realistic and I am not from India. Seemed kind of representative of one of the elements of the universal human experiences to me.
–Excerpts from IMDB reviews
If you’re a sensitive viewer who takes offense to toilet humor, this is film is NOT for you! In fact, there is NOT much to the story, aside from the road trip that this trio (along w/ a loyal manservant) go on. Piku is a very concerned, stressed-out young architect who lives w/ her 70 y.o. cranky and constipated father. She is a partner in a small architecture firm w/ her friend, Syed (Jishu Sengupta). Though Piku is nearing 30 and not yet married, her father isn’t concerned. Syed sets her up w/ a single guy he knows, BUT Piku has nothing in common w/ him.
Marriage without purpose is for the low IQ. -Bhaskor’s philosophy on marraige

Opinions re: Irrfan Khan’s performance
Irrfan is fabulous. He’s given some of the film’s best moments and the talented actor only elevates those moments with his superior act.
Irrfan Khan is known for his gifted talent of never disappointing his viewers. With this film, once again, he proves how worthy his presence is.

The MAIN reason I wanted to see this film (now streaming on Netflix) was Irrfan Khan. Though Rana now runs his family’s car rental business, he had planned for in a different life. He is a decent, hardworking man w/ family obligations of his own. Rana has a LOT of patience- he’ll need that on the road w/ Piku and her father!
NOTE: This review contains MILD SPOILERS.
Five minutes into the movie, you were probably marveling, as I was, at the way production designer Colin Gibson created an entire civilization that looked (dys)functional to every last detail. (Gibson and his team also created the movie’s insane lineup of vehicles.) -Detroit Free Press
I know what you’re thinking (esp. if a regular reader): Why did YOU watch this movie!? It’s definitely NOT my type of film, BUT I heard several positive reviews (podcasts, radio, online folks, etc.) Also, I know almost nothing about the Mel Gibson films- played Max first. I wanted to see Tom Hardy (who appeared in Wuthering Heights shown on PBS years back). I saw this reboot on HBO this past SAT, when the channel premiered it.
In those days, we were far removed, They’d ship everything over, so you’d get magazines like four months after they’d been released in the United States and Europe, so we were always quite a way behind the trends. But Kiwis are really innovative people, and we try to make up a lot of our own things. -Lesley Vanderwalt (Hair & Makeup Designer)
The FIRST thing you will notice is the wild, wacky look of the film- TRULY like nothing I’d seen before! As for ALL that sand- it was shot partly in the desert of Namibia. The music is quite effective, and unusual. Over time, you discover that Imperator Furiosa (Charlize Theron) is the REAL lead of the story; she is seeking some sort of redemption after years of being the right-hand of the warlord, Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne, an Australian veteran actor who also appeared in the original films). Nicholas Hoult (a young Brit) does a fine job as a Nux, a formerly fanatical supporter (“War Boy”) who learns that there is MORE to life than fighting to get into “Valhalla” (Heaven).
Mad Max: Fury Road should be recognized for the ground it broke: slipping in a feminist, elaborately constructed world in a moment, and a genre, where those things are typically at odds. -Katharine Cusumano (Bustle)
So, is this a feminist film (as MANY critics have commented)? Well, that’s up to YOU to decide! Max (the loner) helps Furiosa (a take-action gal w/ NO apologies) on her quest to get the wives of Immortan Joe (including Zoe Kravitz) to a place of safety. There is NO romance between them, BUT a gradual growth of respect- how refreshing! This film was mainly about world-building (Ali Mattu, a fan of this film, agreed w/ me on that); he replied (tweeted) that there will be sequels in the near future. Even if you’re skeptical, give Fury Road a shot.

Background & Trivia
The film was first announced in 2003. Sanjay Leela Bhansali initially wanted to cast Salman Khan and Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, but plans fell through when the real life couple had a messy, highly publicized breakup. Bhansali then kept Khan on and approached Kareena Kapoor to play Mastani and Rani Mukerji to play Kashibai, but shelved his plans and moved on to other projects. Over the following decade, several major actors were rumored to be linked to the project (Shahrukh Khan, Ajay Devgan, Hrithik Roshan and Katrina Kaif).
Coming out on the same day as Dilwale (2015), this marks the third time that a Sanjay Leela Bhansali directed film and Shahrukh Khan starring vehicle were released on the same day after their common Devdas (2002) in July 2002, and later the competing Saawariya (2007) and Om Shanti Om (2007), both released on Diwali 2007.
Production designers created more than 21 sets, which required extensive research.
Priyanka Chopra (star of the ABC drama Quantico) followed a 15 day coaching course to learn the Marathi language as spoken during the time of Peshwas.
The narrator of this film (Irrfan Khan) may sound familiar to some viewers; he has appeared in many American/English language films (including Life of Pi; The Namesake; New York, I Love You).

Disclaimer
This film begins and ends with a lengthy disclaimer:
The Filmmaker fully acknowledges and respects other perspectives and viewpoints with regard to the subject of the film. The Filmmaker does not intend in any manner to belittle, disrespect, impair or disparage the beliefs, feelings, sentiments and susceptibilities of any person(s), community(ies), society(ies) and their culture(s), custom(s), practice(s) and tradition(s).
SPOILERS: Don’t read from this point if you don’t want to know details from this film.
Set-Up of the Film
Love is its own religion.
In early 18th century India, a proud/respected/ young warrior Bajirao (Ranveer Singh) is chosen as the new Peshwa (the equivalent of a modern day prime minister) by a Maratha king.
While traveling, an emissary (dressed as a soldier) infiltrates Bajirao’s tent and demands his help in fighting invaders to her land. She is a bold/gorgeous/warrior princess called Mastani (Deepika Padukone). The audience soon learns that she is the daughter of a (Hindu) Rajput King and his (Muslim) consort. Since her parents are of different faiths, their union is illegitimate, as is Mastani herself. Also, she is considered a Muslim, like her mother. (Here lies the crux of the controversy of this film- Muslims and Hindus in love relationships.)
Impressed by her skills as a warrior, Bajirao assists her with his army and defeats the invaders to her land. Mastani and Bajirao develop feelings for each other and he presents her his dagger, which is always at his waist. This is also a symbol of marriage among her people, the Rajputs. Of course, Bajirao doesn’t know this tradition!
After this battle, Bajirao departs for his opulent estate in Pune, where his beautiful/childlike/adoring wife Kashibai (Priyanka Chopra) awaits him. When they joke about her husband being away so much, she proudly declares to her servants that “he has never looked at another woman.” No wilting wallflower, Mastani (with only one complaining young handmaiden), decides to pursue Bajirao- a love triangle is formed!

My Thoughts
I went to see this film in my neighborhood Regal theater (rare to see Bollywood films there) w/ one of my gal pals (also Bangladeshi-American and near my age) and my mom (who rarely watches these types of films; she prefers Indian indies). The theater was nearly packed- a BIG surprise to us! Being desis, we knew it was going to be long (duh!) and have dance/singing (a staple), BUT were still impressed w/ the scale of the production, costuming, and even the acting (Chopra can’t ruin this). I’d never seen Singh or Padukone before, but they did a good job w/ the material. Padukone is very graceful and strong in her role, but also has a VERY innocent/other-wordly aura about her (maybe it’s her FAB skin).

One of my other gal pals (South Indian heritage) LOVED the film and all the 3 leads; she saw it the week after it debuted on DEC 18th. This is one of those epic films that knows it’s an epic, so the music can be bombastic and lines are proclaimed (not merely spoken in a natural manner). However, I think that it’s a LOT better than Bollywood films I’ve seen in the past (several years ago, so may NOT be the best judge). I liked the dances, BUT my friend wasn’t impressed w/ the songs (she watches Bollywood films once in a while). I suggest you check it out IF you have an interest in Bollywood (BUT take it for what it IS, don’t put TOO much interpretation into this genre)!
Related Links
99 Homes
99 Homes shouldn’t be described as the typical tour-de-force, but more of a tour-de-fact cinematic achievement.
Holding his own against a larger than life acting force that is Shannon, Garfield’s Nash allows himself to feed off Carver’s greed and sinisterly convincing monologues with scenes of heart-wrench, grit and sensitivity.
-Comments from a viewer from Canada (IMDB)
I saw this film at a pre-screening (w/ my movie Meetup group); I wasn’t expecting it to be this good! Michael Shannon (who portrays a quite realistic villain) is a shoe-in for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar. (FYI: Broadgreen acquired the film late in OCT ’14, then tried to squeeze in a release before the end of that year to qualify for the Oscars. They decided they didn’t have enough time to mount a proper marketing campaign, so it sat on the shelf until OCT ’15.)
Read my review of director Ramin Bahrani’s first film, Man Push Cart.
Read A.O. Scott’s comprehensive NYT review here.
Ex Machina
…if the test is passed, you are dead center of the greatest scientific event in the history of man. -Nathan
If you’ve created a conscious machine, it’s not the history of man. That’s the history of gods. -Caleb
Quiet dialogue scenes between two characters are filmed in such an impactful way, making them feel hauntingly austere, sweet and innocent, or terrible and frightening, through meticulous use of composition, light and sound.
The performances are excellent, most notably Alicia Vikander as the beguiling Ava, who absolutely passes for being ‘almost human.’ Domhnall Gleeson also delivers a quiet and focused performance as Caleb. Like Ava, he is relatable… in complete contrast to the boorish, reckless Nathan (Oscar Isaac).
The dialogue feels real and non-cliché. The ending probably will not satisfy everyone… Overall I found it to be enthralling and disturbing stuff.
-Comments from a viewer in Ireland
This year, I’ve been listening to a few different movie podcasts; ALL of them reviewed and praised this sci-fi film. I FINALLY saw it 2 weeks ago and was VERY surprised (which is rare these days- stories becoming more and MORE repetitive, cliched, and just plain boring). Alex Garland, the writer and director, is going to be one to watch in the future (no pun intended). This is more like a 3-person play, as one critic noted, NOT a typical sci-fi film. Even the music is out-of-the box! You can watch it on Netflix; don’t forget to recommend to your friends who don’t usually go in for sci-fi (they’ll thank you later).
Do y’all remember when I FIRST wrote re: Issac?
Inside Out
When I was asked to do this, the script was amazing. I went up to Pixar and I cried. I was just in a meeting with these guys and they showed me the story and I started weeping. -Mindy Kaling
This is another film I saw at a pre-screening (w/ my movie Meetup group): I went in knowing almost nothing about it, aside from the fact that Kaling, Amy Poehler, and Louis Black were playing some of the voices. It ALSO turned out to be a pleasant surprise (Bing Bong was one of my faves)! The crowd was moved throughout the animated film; we were almost ALL grown-ups from 20s-50s. You can see this film w/ the entire family- each person will get something different out of it!
Brooklyn
I went to see this film w/ my mom- we BOTH loved it! And can you believe that Saoirse Ronan is ONLY in her early 20s!? Emory Cohen (who I’d never seen before) does a FINE job as Tony; I think he was channeling a young, BUT more low-key version of Brando. This is another film w/ Domhnall Gleeson- here, he plays Jim, the handsome (check out that darker red hair and preppy wardrobe), well-settled Irish bar owner; this is a far cry from his roles in Ex Machina and the new Star Wars film.
Read Virginia’s VERY well-written review here.
Listen to Me Marlon
A MUST-SEE for fans of classic films! It has been playing on Showtime for the past 2 wks or so; it will be on WED, 12/30 at 10PM EST. It kept me glued to my seat past midnight, even though I should’ve been sleeping.
Star Wars: The Force Awakens
By now, you ALL must have seen this movie- maybe some saw it twice! There were quite a FEW surprises for me, even though I’d (partly) been spoiled by the time I saw it last week. Gleeson is here again (getting to REALLY like him), as are Isaac (LOVE him already) and Adam Driver (mostly known for his recurring role on HBO’s Girls). Harrison Ford is onscreen for a good amount of time- my mom and lil bro BOTH liked that. The two newbie leads (Daisy Ridley and John Boyega) did VERY well; they also had GREAT chemistry. My mom also liked the new robot (BB-8). Go check it out if you haven’t yet- you’ll have a GREAT time for sure!