In My Ear (June 2022): Podcast Episodes for Cinephiles

The Feminist Frequency (hosted by Anita Sarkeesian):

1950s Hollywood with Alonso Duralde, author & podcaster (Breakfast All Day)
Femme Fatale: 1940s Hollywood & Film Noir w/ Julie Grossman, literature & film studies professor
30s Hollywood: Did the Hays code actually create opportunities for queer subtext? w/ Patricia White, professor

You Must Remember This (created/hosted by Karina Longworth):

For Fans of the Erotic Thriller Genre (my “guilty pleasure” in pandemic life):

1988: KEVIN COSTNER, SEAN YOUNG, NO WAY OUT & BULL DURHAM (EROTIC 80S PART 11) /JUNE 13, 2022

1987: FATAL ATTRACTION AND DIRTY DANCING (EROTIC 80S PART 10) / JUNE 6, 2022

1986: 9 ½ WEEKS, MICKEY ROURKE & ZALMAN KING (EROTIC 80S PART 9) / MAY 30, 2022

1985: FEAR SEX. JAGGED EDGE & AIDS (EROTIC 80S PART 8) / MAY 23, 2022

For Fans of Classic Films:

SIX DEGREES OF JOAN CRAWFORD: THE MIDDLE YEARS (MILDRED PIERCE TO JOHNNY GUITAR) /AUGUST 29, 2016

HE RAN ALL THE WAY: JOHN GARFIELD (THE BLACKLIST EPISODE #6) /MARCH 14, 2016

“We” are nuanced people, too!

Islam is not a race, yet Islamophobia partakes of racist characteristics.  Most Muslims do not “choose” Islam in the way that they choose to become doctors or lawyers, nor even in the way that they choose to become fans of Coldplay or Radiohead.  Most Muslims, like people of any faith, are born into their religion.  They then evolve their own relationship with it, their own, individual, view of life, their own micro-religion, so to speak.

Variations among believers:

There are more than a billion variations of lived belief among people who define themselves as Muslim – one for each human being, just as there are among those who describe themselves as Christian, or Buddhist, or Hindu. Islamophobia represents a refusal to acknowledge these variations, to acknowledge individual humanities, a desire to paint members of a perceived group with the same brush. In that sense, it is indeed like racism. It simultaneously credits Muslims with too much and too little agency: too much agency in choosing their religion, and too little in choosing what to make of it.

Lived religion is a very different thing from strict textual analysis. Very few people of any faith live their lives as literalist interpretations of scripture. Many people have little or no knowledge of scripture at all. Many others who have more knowledge choose to interpret what they know in ways that are convenient, or that fit their own moral sense of what is good. Still others view their religion as a kind of self-accepted ethnicity, but live lives utterly divorced from any sense of faith.

On women and Islam:

I have female relatives my age who cover their heads, others who wear mini-skirts, some who are university professors or run businesses, others who choose rarely to leave their homes. I suspect if you were to ask them their religion, all would say “Islam”. But if you were to use that term to define their politics, careers, or social values, you would struggle to come up with a coherent, unified view.

Stereoptypes of Muslim men:

In my early 20s, I remember being seated next to a pretty Frenchwoman at a friend’s birthday dinner in Manila. Shortly after we were introduced, and seemingly unconnected with any pre-existing strand of conversation, she proclaimed to the table: “I’d never marry a Muslim man.” “It’s a little soon for us to be discussing marriage,” I joked. But I was annoyed. (Perhaps even disappointed, it occurs to me now, since I still recall the incident almost two decades later.) In the cosmopolitan bit of pre-9/11 America where I then lived, local norms of politeness meant that I’d never before heard such a remark, however widely held the woman’s sentiments might have been.

-Mohsin Hamid, writer (from a recent Guardian op ed piece)p017j094