Tag: Family

“Moonstruck” (1987) starring Cher, Nicolas Cage, Olympia Dukakis, & Danny Aiello

Emma1 Comment

Ronny Cammareri: I’m in love with you.

Loretta Castorini: [slaps him twice] Snap out of it!

No sooner does Italian-American widowed bookkeeper, Loretta Castorini (Cher), accept a marriage proposal from her dull bf, Johnny Cammareri (Danny Aiello), she finds herself falling for his younger/hot-headed brother, Ronny (Nicolas Cage- at only 23 y.o.) She tries to resist, BUT Ronny (who lost a hand in an accident) still blames on his brother; he has no scruples about pursuing Loretta while Johnny is in Italy. Loretta (whose conventional life is shaken up) falls deeply in love; she also learns that she’s NOT the only one in her family w/ a secret romance. There is tension in their (spacious Brooklyn) house btwn Loretta’s father/plumber, Cosmo (Vincent Gardino), and homemaker mother, Rose (Olympia Dukakis).

Ronny Cammareri: Loretta, I love you. Not like they told you love is, and I didn’t know this either, but love don’t make things nice – it ruins everything. It breaks your heart. It makes things a mess. We aren’t here to make things perfect. The snowflakes are perfect. The stars are perfect. Not us. Not us! We are here to ruin ourselves and to break our hearts and love the wrong people and die. The storybooks are bullshit. Now I want you to come upstairs with me and get in my bed!

They don’t make movies like this anymore! You can watch it w/ your family (w/o cringing), the older characters are developed, and there is terrific dialogue. Though it is grounded in a specific NYC neighborhood and family, there is a soaring romance at the center. John Patrick Shanley said he was “starving” and “struggling to pay rent” (in NYC) when he wrote the screenplay. He’d worked mainly as a playwright before, BUT it didn’t bring in much money. Moonstruck (based on Shanley’s real-life experience of growing up w/ Italian-American friends/neighbors) is one of the few rom coms that earned a Best Picture Oscar. Its director, Norman Jewison (who passed away last week at age 97), noted how rare that was (in a 2006 doc about the film). Jewison worked on a LOT of great movies in his (long/successful) career, incl. In the Heat of the Night (1967), Fiddler on the Roof (1971), A Soldier’s Story (1984), and The Hurricane (1999).

Cher won Best Actress, Dukakis won Best Supporting Actress, and Shanley won Best Original Screenplay- wow! The studio didn’t think Cage was right, BUT Cher stood up for him, even saying she’d quit if he wasn’t hired. Julie Bovasso (who also plays Loretta’s aunt Rita Cappomaggi) helped some actors w/ their (Italian/Brooklyn) accents. This was Aiello’s 1st time working in comedy. The cast had considerable time to rehearse; this is rare for Hollywood movies nowadays. My fave scene is the one where Rose goes out to dinner and makes an unexpected connection w/ a prof, Perry (John Mahoney) who usually dates younger women. Of course, we discover that Rose wouldn’t get involved w/ him; she is too grounded in her values and still loves her husband.

“Anatomy of a Fall” (2023) starring Sandra Huller, Swann Arlaud, & Milo Machado Graner

Emma1 Comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Anatomy of a Fall (available to rent/buy on VOD).

A woman is suspected of her husband’s murder, and their blind son faces a moral dilemma as the main witness. -Synopsis

Samuel Maleski (Samuel Theis) is found dead in the snow outside the isolated chalet (in the French Alps) where he lived w/ his wife, Sandra Voyter (Sandra Huller), and their partially-sighted 11 y.o. son Daniel (Milo Machado Graner). An investigation leads to the conclusion of “suspicious death,” as it’s impossible to know for sure whether he took his own life or was killed. Sandra’s old friend, Vincent Renzi (Swann Arlaud), is her lead defense attorney. Sandra is indicted, so we follow her trial, where her marriage is dissected. The French legal system is quite different from our own! Daniel is caught in the middle- btwn the trial and life w/ his mother.

When we started working on this film, it was like a genre film. We have so many thrillers on all the platforms and I wanted to do something different. The original idea was to have a film where there was a lack of visual elements and images, unlike films which depict a trial where there are all sorts of flashbacks and you see the life of the couple – that might have been easier – I could have shown their lives in that manner. But everything is based on absence. The child doesn’t see very well and there aren’t many images, yet you have this loud, loud music which is a focal point for the film. Whence the idea of placing the spectator in a position like the child or the jurors where there’s a lack of facts and evidence – everything is interlinked. This delirium springs from the fact that there’s so much that’s missing. -Justine Triet, director/co-writer (Cannes 2023)

Sandra [testifying in court]: Sometimes a couple is kind of a chaos and everybody is lost. Sometimes we fight together and sometimes we fight alone, and sometimes we fight against each other, that happens.

The screenplay was written by Triet (who started her career in documentaries) and her life partner, Arthur Harari. They have 2 kids together and started writing this movie in the COVID-19 pandemic (when under lockdown in Paris). This movie is a blend of domestic and legal drama- something which we (Americans) don’t often see. Triet explained that she was influenced by the Amanda Knox case, esp. how the young American woman was treated by the media. She noted that there was a LOT of misogyny in the way the press covered that case.

Sandra [to her son, Daniel]: My love. I just want you to know that I’m not that monster, you know. Everything you hear in the trial it’s just.. it’s twisted. It wasn’t like that.

Anatomy of a Fall (which is in English and French) won the Palm d’Or at Cannes. Language plays an important part here. We notice that English is the language that Samuel (a Frenchman) and Sandra (German) have in common. Daniel can speak English and French well; it’s easier for adolescents to pick up languages. At times, Sandra is at a loss for the appropriate French words in court, so she requests to speak in English (which is allowed).

The lead character is NOT always likeable and remains somewhat mysterious; some may wonder IF Sandra could be guilty. IMO- no- she was innocent (though that’s NOT the only focus of the filmmakers). In the middle of the movie, there is a flashback to a fight btwn her and Samuel. Some viewers said they were shocked by how realistic it seemed! As some of you may’ve guessed, Triet said that she was inspired by the fight btwn. the characters played by Adam Driver and Scarlett Johansson in Marriage Story (2019). Sandra was more successful as a writer than her husband; Samuel earned money by teaching. Daniel (a V smart/sensitive boy) was closer to his father than his mother; his loyal dog is his constant companion.

The film moves towards this point, where it’s the child who becomes the centerpiece of the trial. What does the film talk about? It talks about a child – he carries around a very heavy weight. He’s very close to his mother, he trusts her and then there are cracks that appear and he effectively finds himself in the position of the jury; in other words having to decide whether his mother is guilty or not. We’ll never know. We’ll never know whether his testimony is true or not. I was deeply touched to see this kind of situation and it’s particularly moving as a child. I think this is the first film where I’ve really given the floor to a child. The whole of the film moves towards this point. -Triet, when asked re: the testimony of the son in the trial (Cannes 2023)

I’d heard positive buzz about this movie for several mos. before I saw it (by renting on Amazon Prime). I enjoyed it a LOT, as it subverted my expectations; IMO it’s one of the best movies of 2023! The acting is terrific, incl. by Graner and the dog (Huller’s pet IRL). Huller is garnering attention for Zone of Interest, as that film was also released in 2023. The advocat general (Antoine Reinertz) is a tough prosecutor; he has a quick wit. Some critics said that they loved to hate him! Arlaud (keeps things grounded/has charm) has the kind of (angular) face which looks different from different angles; he and Huller have great chemistry. At a recent awards event, Triet joked w/ a journo and Graner: “Doesn’t he look like a baby Adam Driver?” Such a cute moment! Check this movie out for yourself, IF you haven’t done so already.

“The Killing of a Sacred Deer”(2017) starring Collin Farrell, Nicole Kidman, & Barry Keoghan

Emma2 Comments

After the untimely death of 16 y.o. Martin’s (Barry Keoghan), father on the operating table, a bond forms btwn him and the cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Steven Murphy (Collin Farrell). Martin gets an expensive watch, then an invitation for dinner w/ the family in Stephen’s spacious/suburban home. The (humble/shy) teen quickly wins the approval of Steven’s wife/eye doctor, Anna (Nicole Kidman), and their 2 kids: 13 y.o. Kim (Raffey Cassidy) and 11 y.o. Bob (Sunny Suljic). Soon, Martin invites Stephen to come to his home and meet his widowed/lonely mother (Alicia Silverstone). Unexpectedly, the sins of the father come back to affect the entire Murphy family!

This is a modern take on a Greek myth; the movie’s title comes from the ending of the tragedy Iphigenia in Aulis by Euripides. It’s a (lesser-known) Greek myth; in JHS, I got V interested in Greek mythology when we studied it in English class. Before Greek director/writer, Yorgos Lanthimos, became famous/Oscar-nominated for The Favourite (2018), he made this domestic drama/horror/mystery. Despite it’s V dark events/serious themes, much of the movie is shot on sunny days or in bright lighting. The film was shot on location in Cincinnati, Ohio (which is NOT often shown in media). Farrell starts off attempting to do a Midwestern accent, BUT then it falls off half-way through the movie. Kidman does a better job; she played a LOT of Americans in her career. Keoghan does a good job w/ the American accent; I think he slipped once. When Martin talks re: his father’s favorite film, the actor’s natural/Irish accent can be heard on the word “father.”

This is one of those films where you ask yourself: “Whoa, what did I just watch!?” It’s definitely for those looking for fun/escapist entertainment! It’s also NOT for more sensitive viewers, such as those who dislike seeing blood, violence, etc. The characters speak in a stilted manner, which is NOT quite naturalistic; their responses are often weird/unexpected (from what we’d expect in everyday society). Steven has bought into his own self-importance/power; he needs to be in control (in and out of surgery). Anna is able to stand up to Steven; she is NOT a pushover in this story. This was a “breakout” role for Keoghan (at just 24 y.o.) The actor makes himself appear younger/smaller (baggy clothes/stooping down) and takes on a (sad-eyed/down-trodden) physicality for Martin. At first, the audience feels sorry for Martin; he maybe just needs attention/guidance. Then, we start to wonder IF something is unstable about his personality. What are Martin’s true motives?

[1] Because this is such a primal story, it could be the most powerful and disturbing film of the year. The characters speak in a kind of dead tone, usually on banal matters (like how waterproof a watch is). The music alternates eerie silences with harsh nerve-wracking strings and drums. Shots of surgery and blood churn the stomach. The widescreen settings have an amphitheatrical stretch. Alone among recent films, it sends you out in catharsis — “calm of mind, all passion spent.” This film releases you, drained.

A man’s misdeed brings down a curse upon his entire house that only his own immense sacrifice can expiate. That’s the Greek tragedy, beside which our mundane stories of simple guilt, rationalization, mercy, forgiveness, and even human justice — the business of cops and courts — dwindle into insignificance.

[2] From the very first scene, to where your mind goes in regard to the sexual nature of the relationships, to the inappropriate or generally eyebrow-raising topics of discussion between some of the characters, this film is MEANT to BE “creepy” and to make the viewer FEEL odd, off – and even dirty.

Much of the creepy-factor, if you will, comes PRECISELY FROM the amazing way in which most of these talented actors made these characters come across as disturbing, unappealing, ALMOST like most of us, ALMOST worth sympathizing with, but not quite. It would have lost much as a film of this nature had the acting been that of a normal or run-of-the-mill family). Again, EVERYTHING, from the topics of conversations, to their postures, to their almost detached delivery, was purposeful and meant to lend to the eeriness of the film and the discomfort of the viewer.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

“Past Lives” (2023) starring Greta Lee, Teo Yoo, & John Magaro

EmmaLeave a comment

SPOILER ALERT: Don’t read this post if you haven’t seen, or don’t want to know, details from the movie Past Lives (available to rent/buy on VOD).

Na Young (AKA Nora) and Hae Sung, two deeply connected childhood friends, are wrested apart when Nora’s family emigrates from South Korea to Canada. Twenty-four years later, they’re reunited in NYC for one fateful week as they confront notions of love and destiny. -Synopsis

As fans of HBO’s Girls (2012-2017) may recall, Greta Lee played Soojin (an artist’s asst/frenemy of Marnie) in 4 eps (S2-S3). Adam Driver (Adam Sackler on Girls) and Lee were photographed chatting at the Gotham Awards after-party last Fall in NYC. They’re both 40, have worked in NYC theaters, and played younger characters. Past Lives is a beautiful (inside and out) indie drama written/directed by Celine Song (a 1st time director). This film (produced by A24) won the National Society of Film Critics Best Picture award. Like Nora (Lee), Song moved w/ her parents from Korea to Canada; her father was a filmmaker. She later settled in the US, worked as a playwright, and married a Jewish/American writer- Justin Kuritzkes. This story is based on Song’s real life, BUT w/ “dramatic moments added” (as she explained).

Arthur [to Nora]:  You dream in a language I can’t understand. It’s like there’s this whole place inside you I can’t go.

In a profile of Lee in the NYT on May 30, 2023, Song said she tried to keep the 2 leads separated (as much as possible) to help the scenes when Nora and Hae Sung finally meet in person after a long separation. This film is in BOTH Korean and English; director Bong Joon Ho’s American interpreter helped Lee improve her skills in Korean. Yoo (42 y.o.) speaks fluent English, along w/ 3 other languages; he was born/raised in Germany and studied in the US (Lee Strasberg Inst). Song also did not let Yoo and John Magaro (Arthur- Nora’s husband) meet before shooting. When Hae Sung and Arthur meet each other for the 1st time, it’s the same for the actors. The shot that was eventually in the movie ended up being the 1st take. Magaro (40 y.o.) is mainly an indie movie/theater actor who often plays New Yorkers (w/ a V believable accent). As some critics commented, Arthur understands the appeal seeing how handsome Hae Sung looks.

Nora [to Hae Sung]: Getting married is hard for idealistic people like you.

Nora and Hae Sung (an engineer who is hesitant re: marriage) spend a few days together in NYC; they walk, talk, and visit some tourist attractions. Though they barely hug or touch, we sense some tension (romantic potential). One night, they’re joined by Arthur at an East Village bar. Nora (who sits btwn the 2 men) finds herself in the role of interpreter and intermediary btwn 2 cultures. Unlike many modern movies, Past Lives is restrained, understated, and effectively uses silence. Perhaps most refreshing- it doesn’t play into melodrama and Hollywood stereotypes, esp. w/ the “love triangle.” Some viewers were reminded of Richard Linklater’s Before trilogy (w/ Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy). I loved this film- and yes- I did cry!

At 40, it’s strange to be called a breakthrough actor. I’ve been doing this for 20 yrs! -Greta Lee

[1] The actors who play the sweethearts as adults, Greta Lee and Teo Yoo, are both exceptional, but it’s Lee who creates the most fascinating character. […]

The movie is also a sensitive look at what it feels like to be an immigrant, torn between two cultures, and not sure whether the nostalgia you feel is what you really want or just the allure of the familiar.

[2] Such a touching film, but at the same time, never cloying, because the script and direction from Celine Song were so wonderfully restrained. […] The characters were beautifully drawn and didn’t devolve into cliches, an example of which was the husband who gave a master class in being understanding and supportive. Beautiful cinematography too. Definitely one to see.

[3] A simple plot becomes a richly complex story of lost love, sought closure, and found purpose; and it’s all due to Celine Song having the proper understanding of when to allow silence to speak.

Yet despite the frequent bouts of silence, not a moment feels wasted. Every shot and sentence is meticulously edited to give us exactly what we need to feel each moment with its full emotional power.

-Excerpts from IMDb reviews

Spoiler-Free Reviews of Three 2023 Movies

EmmaLeave a comment

Killers of the Flower Moon

In 1920s Oklahoma, a simple-minded/former WWII soldier, Ernest Burkhart (Leonardo DiCaprio), comes under the influence of his powerful/businessman uncle, William Hale (Robert DeNiro). In this area, the members of the Osage nation are V wealthy, as they hold land rights (to where oil was discovered). While working as a driver, Ernest meets and courts Mollie (Lily Gladstone), a young/single Osage woman who comes from a family of several sisters. Ernest and Mollie marry and have children, though their life together is NOT always smooth. In time, we learn of (mysterious) deaths of several Osage; the (newly formed) FBI sends agents to investigate, incl. Tom White (Jesse Plemons).

IF the 3 hrs. and 26 mins. run time doesn’t put you off, then you should check it out. I feel V important events, issues, and themes are discussed. I saw it w/ 2 of my friends a few weeks after it was released. I think younger (under 25) audiences could have a tough time, as they have shorter attention spans. Modern viewers are also NOT used to such long takes of scenes, some of which could’ve been edited further. IF you’re sensitive to blood, racist/sexist language, and violence, this MAY be difficult to watch; director Martin Scorsese films don’t shy away from these elements.

DiCaprio (who made a salary of $30M) is wearing a downturned (frowning) expression w/ his brows knit tightly; some critics commented that Ernest is working hard to understand what’s going on (as he’s NOT V smart). Gladstone is prominent in the 1st half of the film; she can express a LOT while speaking little. DeNiro plays the affable (unofficial) patriarch; he speaks the Osage language and knows the culture. I thought that most of the supporting (mostly NOT famous) characters did a good job and fit their roles; the standout was Louis Cancelmi (as several critics have noted). The production design was V impressive; you can tell that a LOT of research went into this production.

I was disappointed that the FBI storyline was NOT as developed much as I expected. The FBI came in ONLY in the last 1/3 of the movie; Tatanka Means (son of activist/actor Russell Means) is the young/handsome Native American agent. As some of you MAY know, the (original) script had DiCaprio playing Tom White and focused more on the law & order angle. When Scorsese decided to focus more on Ernest and Mollie’s story, Plemons was brought on to play Agent White (who became a supporting character). There are some V effective shots which will stay in your mind; we wouldn’t expect less from Scorsese. What did you think of the ending? I think it was an unusual directorial decision. This story did get me emotional in the final moments.

Napoleon

I went to see this movie on a TUES about one week after it was released; I ONLY paid $7 for the ticket (at Regal). I didn’t have high hopes, BUT was curious to see what director Ridley Scott had done. I was disappointed to see that French actor, Tahar Rahim (who plays aristocrat/general Paul Barras), was ONLY in the first 1/3 of the story. English actress Vanessa Kirby (Josephine) is a strong onscreen presence; I wanted to know a BIT more about her. As for Joaquin Phoenix in the lead role, I was NOT impressed by the characterization (we know he is a strong actor). He speaks w/ an American accent and is now close to 50; Napoleon accomplished much as a young man. Napoleon often looks tired, annoyed, and petulant; we see him planning battles (in ONLY one scene) though he was famed for strategy. As one critic said, this movie shows us “the greatest hits” (just 3 of his battles). As for these few action scenes, I thought they were done quite well. Some of the background CGI is NOT that realistic. At the end, I saw that the (small) audience I went to see it w/ was NOT impressed. Scott’s work in the past 15 yrs. has been hit or miss.

Oppenheimer

I went to see this movie the day after it was released, as I had time off that afternoon; the (IMAX) theater was full w/ viewers of ALL ages. I’m sure MANY of you have heard/read re: this movie, so I won’t give a synopsis. I was glad to see that Cillian Murphy (an Irish actor I admire) got a starring role; he is now 47 y.o. (so it’s high time). He is up to the challenge of carrying the film; there are MANY close-ups of his face. My audience seemed to enjoy the scenes w/ Murphy and Matt Damon (in the 1st act); they have good onscreen chemistry and quippy banter. Even more so than w/ KOTFM, we see supporting actors who each get a chance to shine. The standouts among the scientists are two Americans: David Krumholtz (who started out in teen comedies) and Benny Safdie (also an indie director). There are some cameos which MAY surprise viewers.

Unfortunately, we don’t get a LOT of character development for the 2 main women- Kitty (Emily Blunt) and Jean (Florence Pugh). Blunt gets more to do than Pugh; as some critics said in the past, director Christopher Nolan doesn’t focus much on women. Another issue is the (incessantly overdramatic) music which I did NOT appreciate! There are a few shots (whether practical or special effects) that were V impressive. When we get to the last act, it looked like people were NOT as engaged. This is the section where we see more of Robert Downey, Jr; his young aide is played by Alden Ehrenreich (who was the co-lead in Fair Play). It was a V long movie, BUT I was mostly interested in the material. Nolan isn’t much for emotion (as y’all cinephiles know), BUT he does have an unique viewpoint here.