Extended Movie Review: ITV’s “Sense and Sensibility”

One of the DVD covers
One of the DVD covers

I recommend that you don’t read my review until you’ve seen the movie.  But if you don’t mind spoilers, go right ahead.  I watched this (three-part) movie again because I was very impressed upon first viewing it on You Tube this past summer.  Then I saw it on Masterpiece Theater on PBS.  My mom really liked it too, especially the beautiful scenery and music (dramatic when it suited the moment). 

 

 

Mrs. Dashwood
Mrs. Dashwood

 

The newest film adaptation of Sense and Sensibility is a mix of Austen and Bronte, according to producer Anne Pivcevic.  The Dashwood ladies (middle-aged, widowed mother Mary, sensible/practical eldest daughter Elinor, passionate/opinionated middle daughter Marianne, and energetic pre-teen Margaret) actually live in a cottage very close to the sea in Devonshire.  Talk about being removed from “society!”  Most of the rain in the movie is real rain.  Pivcevic and screenwriter Andrew Davies (who adapted Emma starring Kate Beckinsale and the gorgeous Daniel Deronda among others) explain on the commentary track.  The family has fallen very far from the comfort of Norland, the viewer can see clearly.

 

 

Two great interpretations of Elinor
Two great interpretations of Elinor

 

 

I think it’s best not to hope too fervently for something that may never happen.

-Elinor Dashwood on her relationship with Edward

 

Aside from the great settings, I was struck my how well the actors (especially those under 30) performed.  Janet McTeer (Mrs. Dashwood) is a tall, elegant woman.  She brings softness to Mary, who had been a sheltered woman most of her life.  Upon her husband’s death, she is a bit lost, and Elinor (just 19 at the start of the tale) has to explain their financial situation to her.  One of my first thoughts was that Hattie Morahan (Elinor) has amazing skin!  But aside from that, her great posture and fine features seem to suit the time period to a tee.  I like her speaking voice; she sounds very elegant (and very similar to Emma Thompson).  I always imagined Elinor looking something like this- mature, dignified, and a natural beauty. 

 

 

 

Willoughby and Marianne (Ang Lee's film)
Willoughby & Marianne (Ang Lee)

 

  

The new Willoughby & Marianne
The new Willoughby & Marianne

 

Elinor, I don’t care what those people think! –Marianne Dashwood

 

Just 17 when the story begins, Marianne (Charity Wakefield) is justifiably a little rebellious.  She gets upset with Fanny at the dinner table, embarrassed by Sir John and Mrs. Jennings’ jokes, and despairs of ever finding love.  Marianne has many different hairstyles to go along with her many moods; this reminded me of modern girls (who often color/re-fashion their hair).  The actress’ large blue eyes upon a small face are big assets.  As in Ang Lee’s wonderful big screen movie, the young Margaret (here nicknamed Meg) is a bubbly, smart, somewhat tomboyish girl.  She is observant, and often says the things that the grown-ups are thinking.  You can’t fool kids!      

 

 

 

Two VERY different Edwards!
Two VERY different Edwards!

 

I have no wish to be distinguished. –Edward Ferrars

  

This Edwars is NOT plain...
NOT a plain guy at all…

 

I think we all have to find our own ways to be happy. –Edward Ferrars

 

Davies says that he worked hard to punch up the male characters; he felt they were underdeveloped in the book (especially Edward).  I agree about Edward; in the book, he’s not a captivating guy at all.  In this movie, Edward Ferrars (Dan Stevens) is the best looking guy!  His clothes are a bit old-fashioned and faded, as he doesn’t seek fortune or fame (unlike the rest of his family).  Clothes reflect character sometimes, right?  Edward seems shy and awkward, but only briefly; some Austen fans commented that they didn’t like that.  This Edward is thoughtful, very honorable (like in the book), but also outgoing.  I thought the horse-riding scene with Meg was sweet; that (gorgeous black) horse was Colin Farrell’s in Alexander (Dan Stevens says on the commentary). He did a good job with this role; I liked the moments of youthful uncertainty he displayed.  The wet shirt/log chopping scene was a too much out of character.  However, I did like the sincere concern with which he said “You have very little help here.”  That revealed him as a true friend to the family!    

 

Bad boy
Bad boy

He is too rational for me- more to be admired than loved.

 –Willoughby on poet John Pope

 

Davies wanted more action for the men, so he expanded on events that were merely hinted at in the book (for example: the duel between Willoughby and Col. Brandon).  I didn’t think Willoughby (Dominic Cooper, who can currently be seen in The Duchess opposite Keira Knightley) was handsome at all.  However, he was very good at playing up the dark undercurrents of his character.  His big dark eyes, dark hair, and richly colored costumes (red, black, elaborately embroidered) helped portray him as someone (potentially) dangerous.  Remember that this guy seduced a very young girl (the ward of Col. Brandon) in the start of this version, then abandoned her pregnant.  Pivcevic points out that Marianne could also have been ruined by Willoughby because she lets her emotions overtake her judgment at times.  Wow, I’d never thought of that!  She only lets him have a kiss in this film.  Overall, having young actors really paid off!

 

 

 

  

What a CUTE horse!!!
What a CUTE horse!!!

 

…he’s the only one in the neighborhood one can have an intelligent conversation with!

-Marianne on Brandon         

 

I really enjoyed the parts of Brandon and Marianne becoming acquainted before Willoughby raced in.  David Morrissey looks boyish when he smiles; in his eyes, you can see his character’s hopes and fears.  After Brandon gives her the sheet music, note the expectation on his face as he mentions her someday trying his piano- good stuff!  She says she can talk with him.  Marianne wasn’t thinking about love though.  Pivcevic says that she needed to grow up more in order to appreciate a good man like the colonel.  

 

 

 

I shall be very sorry to see her injured. –Col. Brandon on Marianne

 

My favorite moment in the film is at the very end of Part 1.  Notice the look on the colonel’s face when he sees Willoughby paying his first call to Marianne (while her ankle is sprained).  The concern and sadness in his eyes as he walks away from the cottage reveal much about his character.  We can’t help but wonder if Brandon’s just sad for his loss of suit, or if he knows something not-so-nice regarding Willoughby.  Another nice moment is when the girls spot Edward (riding quite fast, I thought) toward the cottage; the look of triumphant happiness on Elinor’s face is very sweet.

  

 

Some comic relief
Some comic relief- the Steele sisters

Company, company, company!  Where would we be without company?

–Sir John

 

I thought that the smaller characters such as: Fanny, Mrs. Jennings, and Lucy’s hilarious sister (Anne) did a fine job.  I loved Anne’s constant chattering about “beaux.” The evil sister-in-law, Fanny, was tightly wound (including her hair), unfeeling, and vain.  Mrs. Jennings, besides being quite a busybody, was sweet and solicitous of the Elinor and Marianne (especially in London).  Lucy was very naïve about Edward’s family; she is a simple country girl after all.    Sir John was too gregarious in the beginning, but he had a twinkle in his eyes that told you he was a decent guy.

 

A painting of JA
A painting of JA

 

Austen makes a big point regarding money in her books, and Sense and Sensibility in no exception.  The girls deserve much more than what half-brother John offers; Fanny changes his mind (as she wears the pants in that family).  Willoughby, who falls in love with Marianne, chooses Ms. Grey “with her 50,000 pounds” after Lady Allen disowns him.  (Lady Allen did so because she found out about his affair with Brandon’s ward, we are told in the Ang Lee version.)  He’s used to the good life.  Edward, fearing his mother’s wrath and disownment, keeps the engagement to Lucy a secret for 4 years!  However, riches are not a big deal for Edward; he wants to become a country parson.

 

One of the main reasons Col. Brandon is seen as very eligible is his great wealth.   Oh, we realize that he has great manners, reads, and is knowledgeable about music.  But that doesn’t put food on the table!  Husbands with good livings (incomes) are very crucial because the girls’ dowries are so small.  Elinor is very aware of that fact, though her mother and Marianne choose not to dwell upon it.  But it all ends well, because respectable, amiable, and pretty girls in Austen’s books get their just rewards!   

 

Elinor nearly misses out on a (very compatible) match because she is too reserved- very aware of propriety.  When her mother wants to write to Edward, she tells her to “let him come in his own time.”  Marianne, on the other hand, risks ruining her reputation by revealing her preference for an (unworthy) man.  Notice how she laughs loudly while dancing with Willoughby; she refuses to dance with any other guy at a party.  This was not considered good manners in Austen’s time.  However, he is her first love, and that’s an age when people aren’t usually sticklers for rules.  I thought it was (a little) risky for her to go riding in the curricle for a few hours and visiting Allenham.  (I had the same thought when I saw the Ang Lee movie, too.)  What do you think?  Watch this new S&S adaptation and share your thoughts!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mark Strong (“my Mr. Knightley”) gets critical acclaim!

The current issue of Time notes that in Guy Ritchie’s new action film RocknRolla “Gerard Butler stars, Tom Wilkinson makes a star turn, and Mark Strong steals the show.”

Mark Strong, a VERY talented British actor, played Mr. Knightley alongside Kate Beckinsale in my favorite movie version of Jane Auten’s Emma.  I felt that his characterization of Mr. Knightley was close to the book; he was tough (lectured Emma loudly), haughty (knew his position in society), and rooted in the mores of the period.  Don’t get me wrong- I LOVE Jeremy Northam’s work, but he made the character more light-hearted and fun in Emma with Paltrow.  Even the way Northam moved was easy; Strong made Knightley darker, moodier, and more of a mystery.

Mark as Mr. Knightley

Jeremy as Mr. Knightley

In that same issue of Time, there is a review of the spy thriller Body of Lies starring Crowe and DiCaprio.  Mark Strong has a crucial role in that film; he plays Hani Salaam, the chief of Jordanian intelligence (who helps out Leo’s character).  Okay, Mark is definitely NOT Middle Eastern, but his looks could be considered “exotic” in Hollywood.  His parents immigrated from Italy before he was born; they chose to give him a British name (because they felt it’d help him fit in).

DiCaprio has some unusual-looking facial hair in this film!  A reviewer thought it was “squiggly” and “distracting”- LOL!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758774/

Next up for “my Mr. Knightley”- Sherlock Holmes with Robert Downey Jr. (Holmes) and Jude Law (Watson).

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0988045/

But the coolest of all- Mark has acted alongside Sir Ian McKellan!  Below is a pic from a theater production of Richard III.

Classic Movie Review: “Laura”

Her youth and beauty, her poise and charm of manner captivated them all. She had warmth, vitality. She had authentic magnetism. Wherever we went, she stood out. Men admired her; women envied her.

Waldo Lydecker (Clifton Webb) describes businesswoman Laura Hunt (Gene Tiermey) in glowing terms to Detective Mark McPherson (Dana Andrews) after her (presumed) death.  Lydecker is an influential, wealthy, sharp-tongued, witty columnist in NYC.  He narrates part of this 1944 film noir, and for the first half of the film, he creates for the audience a picture of Laura.  She was gorgeous, mysterious, confidant- the type of woman that men dream about. 

 

How singularly innocent I look this morning.

Lydecker served as her mentor, and they spent the past 5 years together.  What was the nature of their relationship?  He is imperious, but effeminate in manner- looks non-threatening to the audience.     

Because of Laura’s status and the terrible manner of her death, the media flocks to the doorstep of her 5th Ave apartment.  Though Waldo (a man in his 50s) was close to Laura, she was engaged to the charming, handsome, easy-going Shelby Carpenter (Vincent Price).  Shelby is very friendly with Laura’s wealthy, widowed, middle-aged aunt, Ann Treadwell (Judith Anderson).

 

Waldo, who often tags along with Mark during his investigation, warns the detective.

You’d better watch out, McPherson, or you’ll finish up in a psychiatric ward. I doubt they’ve ever had a patient who fell in love with a corpse.

 

McPherson is a tough, no-nonsense cop who’s not fazed by dealing with society people; he keeps calm by playing with a little handheld game.  He goes over her apt, her letters, and diary.  Laura’s portrait fascinates and unsettles him.  This is not just a typical murder case to him!

Since Laura is a murder mystery, I don’t want to give too much away.  However, I can tell you that it’s a film worth watching.  You won’t see some surprises coming!  The dialogue is sophisticated and entertaining.  The characters are distinct, interesting individuals.  I especially liked Vincent Price’s performance; he seemed very modern and realistic as a down-on-his-luck Kentucky playboy.  Judith Anderson has a great scene where she describes why they are suited for each other.  Clifton Webb has a lot of terrific lines in the film; he reminded me of Oscar Wilde’s writing. 

 

 
 

 

 

Movie Review: “The Wedding Banquet”

 

Director Ang Lee’s films are very impressive- both in his native Mandarin Chinese and English- including Eat Drink Man Woman, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Sense and Sensibility, and Brokeback Mountain.  He has an eye for detail and subtlety.  The conflict between desire and duty is something he exlpores often.  Yet he struggled for 15 years to get his vision out to the public, because he wouldn’t compromise to meet someone else’s standards.  (He was a stay-at-home dad for many years while his wife earned a living.)  If the soft-spoken director had compromised, we wouldn’t have a gem like The Wedding Banquet, Lee’s second film (released in 1993).

 

 

Love, lies, food, family- FUN!!!

The Wedding Banquet, which Lee co-wrote, is a film infused with culture, humor, sensitivity… I could go on and on!  You will laugh, cry, and be (pleasantly) surprised as you watch this comedy.  This film (in Mandarin and English) challenges viewers’ expectations and shatters stereotypes we may have of the Chinese community, gay men, and “traditional” parents.  The main character, Wai Tung, is a well-off, buttoned-down Chinese immigrant businessman who lives in a comfy brownstone with his sweet/funny white American partner Simon, a physical therapist in NYC.   His traditional Chinese parents, who live in Taiwan, are busily looking for a nice, educated girl for him to marry.  Wai Tung wants to help out one of his tenants who has been living for 2 years in a (not so functional) loft in Williamsburg, Brooklyn (before that area became hipster and pricy).  Wei Wei is a painter, independent-spirited- truly a starving artist.  Simon suggests that Wai Tung marry Wei Wei to help her get a green card and make his parents happy.  What could go wrong? 

 

For one thing, the petite beauty, Wei Wei, has a big crush on Wai Tung.  And Wai Tung’s enthusiastic parents, who unexpectedly come to visit, want to follow wedding customs of their homeland.  They are very disappointed by the impersonal city hall ceremony.  (Their reactions are similar to that of Ang Lee’s parents, he explains in an interview.)  Out of the blue, an old army friend of Wai Tung’s father (and owner of a big restaurant) insists on throwing a wedding banquet.  But it’s all pretend, right?

 

Father, whose health is declining, wants a grandson to carry on the family name.  Mother is overjoyed to finally have a “daughter” who can take care of her son when they are gone.  Wai Tung is torn between his established life and one envisioned by the parents he respects and loves deeply.  Wei Wei, seeing the kindness and generosity of her new in-laws, begins to feel guilty.  Even the bubbly, accommodating Simon grows tired of pretending after a while.  How will this mess be settled?  Go find out ASAP! 

 

Movie Review: “The Ghost and Mrs. Muir”

I couldn’t believe my luck in finding this film on sale at F.Y.E. in Astoria recently!  I had wanted to see The Ghost and Mrs. Muir for a long time.  This is an exceptionally well-made Hollywood classic (out in 1947) film starring theatrically-trained/powerhouse actor Rex Harrison (the ghost, Captain Daniel Gregg), one of Hollywood’s most beautiful movie stars Gene Tierney (Mrs. Lucy Muir), charming/rakish comedian George Sanders (Miles Fairley), respected character actor Edna Best (Martha), and a very adorable 8 year old Natalie Wood (Anna Muir).  The unusually beautiful music will stay with you long after the film; the composer also worked on Citizen Kane and collaborated many times with Hitchcock.  It was a big success when it first came out, and also received great reviews from critics- you’ll see why!  It combines the genres of thriller, romance, and comedy.  But romance is key!

 

The story opens at the start of the century (1900 that is) in London.  Young widow Mrs. Lucy Muir, whose husband passed away a year ago, is living with her mother-in-law, sister-in-law, daughter, and housekeeper.  The ladies are all dressed in mourning clothes.  She expresses a strong desire to live on her own (with the income from her husband’s gold shares), much to the shock and disapproval of the in-laws (two hysterical, overbearing ladies).  Mrs. Muir has decided that the seaside will suit her well; she sets off with the eager Anna and loyal Martha. 

 

Upon arrival at Whitecliff-by-the-Sea, Mrs. Muir seeks out a “house agent” to find a suitable place.  Mr. Coombe, the agent, thinks he knows better than the young lady, but Mrs. Muir decides to rent Gull Cottage, a house said to be haunted by the ghost of Capt. Gregg (a seaman who died mysteriously 4 years ago).  She is not frightened away by disembodied laughter like previous tenants.  She says the house is “perfectly fascinating.”  So begins the adventure…

 

The cranky ghost of Capt. Gregg, dressed all in black except his silver buckled belt, reveals himself to Mrs. Muir soon after the family moves in; he’s not happy to have people in his house.  But she stands up to him; she’s not scared by his actions (noises, swearing, extinguishing candles).  She earns respect for that.  In that (first meeting) scene, their faces are only lit.   Light and shadow are used very cleverly and purposefully in this film.

 

Capt. Gregg is unlike the ethereal, other-worldly ghosts we’re used to in modern/special-effects laden movies.  He seems “real” to the audience, because Rex Harrison creates a very masculine, humorous, and witty character.  Harrison uses his strong physical presence (a must for any leading man), commanding voice (after all, he was chosen for My Fair Lady even though he couldn’t sing), and (especially) his eyes to “bring life” to the ghost.  But we also wonder if he is a figment of Mrs. Muir’s imagination?  Harrison is great at reacting to his fellow actors- a big part of acting.  In my honest opinion, the only way to get through the over-hyped Cleopatra is to focus on his portrayal of Julius Caesar.    

 

 

The ghost and the widow become friends; they “occupy the same domestic space like a married couple” (Jeanine Bassinger, chair of the Women’s Studies department at Wesleyan points out on one of the commentary tracks).  However, he has no body, so Mrs. Muir is safe; this satisfied the censors of the day.  When her investments fail, her in-laws come to visit; they urge her to go back with them to London.  But Capt. Gregg forms a plan- he “ghostwrites” a book to boost her finances.  Over some months, Daniel dictates to Lucy (or “Lucia” as he prefers to call her) the story of his lusty, adventurous life.  They work together and fall deeply in love.  It’s a sad fact that she is alive and he is dead! 

 

When Mrs. Muir goes up to London to see a publisher, she catches the eye of Miles Fairley, a well-dressed, smooth-talking, wealthy man in the office.  He’s not exactly her type of man, but he’s real.  Will Mrs. Muir let this (corporeal) man into her heart?    There is a similar choice to be made in Anthony Minghella’s first film, Truly Madly Deeply (if you want to know more). 

 

I highly recommend this film to everyone, not only fans of classic black and white films.  It seems modern to me, in many ways.  The music, lighting, costumes, etc. all work to create a memorable picture.  The exchanges (even the ones without words) that Harrison and Tierney have are terrific; you can see that their characters care about and respect each other.   The film is also “very literate” (Bassinger comments).  This is an intelligent viewer’s movie, though it also evokes emotions.  It is about loss, yearning, and “the dream of love.”  In reality, men are not perfect.  And not everyone has love in their life.  But we all dream!