Tom Hooper (just 40 years old) is the British director who brought us these compelling/gorgeous miniseries: John Adams (2008), Elizabeth I (2005), and Daniel Deronda (2002). Though I haven’t seen it yet, he made a big mark with The King’s Speech (2010), which won 4 Oscars. He brings a very well-known, large-scale tale down to a (small) human level. No doubt, the star of Les Mis is American Anne Hathaway, who shed not only 15 lbs., but almost all of her long hair, for the role of Fantine. Oh, and Hathaway can sing, too! Wow… Viewers will want to see more, but she appears in the first third of the film only.
One person who defininitly should not sing is Australian Russell Crowe, I’m sorry to say. His songs are tolerable (unlike that of Gerard Butler in The Phantom of the Opera), but he doesn’t have a strong voice, and is clearly not very comfortable with this element of the film. (I love Crowe-a fabulous actor-but the producers/studio should’ve looked for a more suitable voice. Everyone can’t do any job.) The film seemed to slow down when Javert came onscreen, aside from the swordfighting scene.
Hugh Jackman (another Australian; got his start in theater) stars as Jean Valjean, a man who transforms his life by taking Fantine’s young daughter, Cosette, into his care. Jackman can sing (but you probably knew that already). In the many close-ups, you can see his emotional range. I was pleasantly surprised, and feel that he needs to challenge himself even more with his next film roles (no offence to X-Men fans).
The film gets a jolt of energy when we meet the money-grubbing Thenardiers (played by Brits Sascha Baron-Cohen and Helena Bonham-Carter) and young, idealistic men who call for revolution (led by Enjolras, American Aaron Tveit).
Then the love-at-first-sight thing happens between the teenage Cosette (American Amanda Seyfried) and idealistic Marius (Brit Eddie Redmayne). A few in the audience wanted to see more of Eponine (British newcomer Samantha Barks). Her voice was lovely! (She also worked in theater.)
I felt that Cosette and Marius had good chemistry together; their singing was pretty good, too. However, the film is too long; editing a bit wouldn’t have hurt. Why draw things out that most of the audience already knows about?
Long-time fans of Les Mis are in for a treat- Colm Wilkinson plays The Bishop, the man who gives Valjean the “gift of silver” to “become an honest man.” Wilkinson, an Irishman, played Valjean onstage for many years; his voice is amazing!
This came up on Twitter yesterday, an excerpt from the Chronicles book that someone had posted on Tumblr. In the snippet, Adam Brown (Ori) is describing how his signature weapon for The Hobbit came about:
“. . . . I recall being in a weapons meeting and the others were all going crazy over their weapons. It was Richard [Armitage] who said to me ‘You should have a slingshot’ and it just kind of stuck . . .”
He’s so adorable. You just want to give Ori a big hug. 😉
I added “Armitage” to the above as there was some confusion over whether it was Weta Design and Special Effects Supervisor Richard Taylor or actor Richard Armitage who made the comment, but Adam Brown himself confirmed in a tweet that it was indeed RA who…
Yes, this is a soap opera for the period drama crowd, but I have to admit the last 2 eps have been esp. good! I cried, then laughed, along w/ the family upstairs and the servants downstairs. The new kids on the show (Alfred, James, Ivy) are fitting in quite well, too. Miss O’Brien & Thomas as enemies is quite good fun! And yes, everyone wants to see more of Anna & Bates…
House of Cards (Netflix; online)
WARNING: Do not watch this show if you have an addictive personality! (You will get hooked right away!) I’d describe it as a mix of The West Wing & Damages. Kevin Spacey (Who doesn’t love him!?) embodies a character that has been described as “part Richard III & Iago.” (For fans of Law & Order: UK, Ben Daniels is in some eps.)
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit: Season 14 (NBC)
You STILL watch that show!?But Stabler is not in it anymore! (Please stop whining over Christopher Melon’s decision. We ALL loved Stabler, OK?) I suppose I “grew up” w/ SVU (13 seasons have gone by)! My lil bro & some friends are big fans, too. Det. Benson (Mariska Hargitay) continues to be one of the strongest (and hottest) leading women on network TV! Amaro (Danny Pino) pretty seamlessly fit into the show. Not a big fan of Rollins; they’re not giving her much to do… And yes, we ALL want to see more of Munch (but he probably has stuff going on & lives partly in France).
Robin Hood: Season 1 (BBC; DVD)
Yes, I watch it for Richard Armitage! (Most ladies over the age of 21 probably do, too.) I will post reviews of S1 eps soon.
Shakespeare Uncovered (PBS; online)
I saw one ep last SAT on my local PBS station. The above pics are from the new Henry V (2012) starring Jeremy Irons (fabulous) & Tom Hiddleston (one of the UK’s hottest young leading men). I’m looking forward to seeing the ep on Macbeth w/ David Tennant! You can buy the DVD, too.
Is Richard’s vision of giving a sympathetic portrayal of the much-maligned British monarch one step closer to reality?
Could be.
Below is the contents of an article by Kathleen Nutt in The Herald Scotlanddated today, February 2, 2013.
A Scots-based researcher who instigated a dig for the remains of Richard III says she has persuaded The Hobbit star Richard Armitage to play the king in a proposed new film.
Philippa Langley finished a screenplay about the medieval monarch’s life last year, months after she led archaeologists to a spot where a skeleton believed to be his was found.
Ms Langley, 50, who is secretary of the Scottish branch of the Richard III Society, came up with the idea of the search during a meeting of the group in February 2009.
Results of tests are to be revealed over the next day or so, conclusively proving whether the…
Seeing the Darcy vs. Thornton post (thanks Maria!) made me think a BIT more about their respective stories, esp. how they go about proposing to their ladies. Let’s watch the one from P&P first with Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth.
Well, they both look pretty awkward- Lizzie is wondering why this insufferable has come to see her in the first place and Darcy is at a loss for a moment (he’s probably never proposed to any woman before). They are in a little sitting room in Charlotte and Mr. Collins’ house. Notice how Darcy leans forward a tiny bit (hopeful) after he says “But it cannot be helped.” After Lizzie calmly/coldly rejects him by saying that she doesn’t even feel “a sense of obligation,” Darcy looks confused/hurt (see the eyes), then turns away and walks over to the mantle. His head is lowered and he’s thinking of what to say next. He even wipes at his mouth, disconcerted. Then he addresses her again, asking why he’s rejected in this manner. Lizzie, who still sits, speaks more loudly and w/ emotion as she mentions her sister ‘s (Jane’s) happiness. Hear how Darcy’s voice rises (sharply) when he hears Wickham’s name. He says: “You take an eager interest in that gentleman’s concers?” Lizzie’s voice also gets louder as she speaks of Wickham. Darcy is sarcastic re: Wickham’s “misfortunes.”
As Lizzie continues, he paces a bit about the (small) room, pauses, then asks “And this is your opinion of me?” (He’s being misunderstood, we later learn.) But when he aproaches her and disses her family connections (in a direct/rude way), you can see the anger on Lizzie’s face even more than before. Her face gets redder, she gets up from her chair, and turns away from him. Then she turns around and attacks him, saying that he “was the last man on Earth” that she “could ever possibly marry.” There is nothing like love/admiration/anything positive in Lizzie’s eyes! She is quite bold (for her time) and expresses herself directly. The day is sunny, we can see, but the mood is quite stormy inside. Darcy quietly says that “you’ve said quite enough. madam” and quickly finds his exit. (Note the formal manner he uses as he leaves.) Elizabeth is very surprised and quite angry (still) after he leaves.
Now, let’s look at the proposal (extended version) from N&S, Ep 2, with Daniela Denby-Ashe and Richard Armitage.
Mr. Thornton is looking toward the door, then out the window of a small room in the Hale’s home (townhouse). He looks nervous as he crosses toward the door when he hears Margaret open it. We notice that her expression is sad/dejected (maybe also tired?); even her posture is poor. The room is not bright or cheerful, but there is some light coming through the curtains. Margaret doesn’t look at him at first; he mentions the color of the fruit. Then she talks about her mother and looks over at him. But as she talks, she keeps her eyes mostly downcast, avoiding his eyes. Her voice sounds young and her words are hesitant.
When Thornton expresses his gratefulness, her face changes quite a bit (eyes wider). She stands taller and goes over to the window, saying she’d “have done the same for any man” who was in danger. Thornton looks confused and repeats “Any man?” Then they go on about the mill strike and the workers’ (violent) behavior. Notice how Margaret speaks quite calmly and steps closer to him (while she offers him advice about his workers). He cuts her off with: “They will get what they deserve.” Then the mood of the scene, as well as his tone, shifts.
Thornton is hesitant to begin; he expressly (but humbly/quietly) states that “I know, I’ve never found myself in this position before.” But just as he gets started (“my feelings for you are very strong”), she cuts him off! She walks away (toward the window), saying that he “shouldn’t continue in that manner.” The the whole “gentleman” deal comes up (big theme in this story). That upsets Thornton, who shoots back that “I’m aware, that in your eyes at least, I’m not a gentleman.” He asks why he is “offensive” (loudly) and Margaret goes off (loudly also), mentioning his status, sister, and mother. “My mother? What has she to do with this?” he asks (confused), leaning over the table. Then she gets into the status/trade quagmire again, accusing him of wanting to “possess” her- pushing all his buttons. “I don’t want to possess you! I wish to marry you because I love you!” he exclaims as he (quickly) walks around the table toward her. (Note the emotion in his voice.) Margaret turns away and says that she doesn’t even “like” him. She looks at him directly for a second as she says that.
Thornton turns away, refers back to the fruit, then goes to the opposite side of the room (mantle). Slowly, Margaret mentions Bessie, who is dying (“too much fluff” in her lungs). Thornton sees that also as an attack upon him. When Margaret tries to protest and calm him down, it doesn’t work (as he said before, he has “a temper”). When she remorsefully explains that she hasn’t “yet learned how to refuse,” Thornton throws in some bitter sarcasm. She goes toward him, but he turns away saying “I understand you completely.” At the end of the scene, Margaret is sorry (I think) that she was so “blunt.”
Wow, so much going on in these two scenes! (You need to watch them a few times.) There are similarities and differences between these two (would-be) couples, as are obvious within these brief clips. The “gentleman” issue doesn’t come up with Mr. Darcy since he doesn’t work, owns a huge estate in Derbeyshire, and is grandson of an earl. Mr. Thornton, on the other hand, is a self-made man (and proud of it) who owns his own cotton mill; he is also a magistrate (in role of modern-day judge) in Milton. But when it comes to the ladies, he’s (admittedly) at a loss; his life has been “too busy” to think of such things. He’s insecure approaching Margaret, partly because she’s the daughter of a learned (studied at Oxford) former clergyman and because he’s never felt this way about any woman before. Remember how he confides in his mother, the night before he proposes, that he “daren’t hoped that such a woman could care for me?”
Darcy, being of such high status (and with a lot of pride), feels that Elizabeth’s family are far, far beneath his sphere. He discourged Bingley from pursuing Jane because of that reason (and also because he didn’t think she loved him). Remember the “Towards him, I have been kinder that toward myself” line? Ouch! Admittedly, Mrs. Bennett, Kitty, and Lydia are no models of propriety, but the manner in which Darcy downgrades Lizzie’s relatives is very harsh. Well, these gents just needed some time to learn and change their attitudes. Also, the ladies needed to change as well, since they held such strong prejudices agains their suitors.
In the book, Margaret feels that she’s not ready to get married, when she’s proposed to for the first time. Recall that she was only 18 at that time, and didn’t feel any strong feelings for Henry Lennox. She liked him as a friend, thought he was smart/clever, but that was about it. As for Lizzie, she was a “sensible girl” in her father’s eyes, but she wanted to fall in love someday, too. She never thought that Darcy would propose to her- she was “astonished” by the entire episode. Wasn’t she just “tolerable” in his eyes?
I like both scenes- in the first one, I sympathized more with Lizzie. But in the second scene, I think my sympathies switched from Margaret to Thornton, then back again. It was more of a fight (in my opinion) and had more movement than the one in P&P.
What did you think of these scenes? Which do you prefer and why?